{"id":2145,"date":"2006-05-11T00:23:42","date_gmt":"2006-05-11T00:23:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html"},"modified":"2006-05-11T00:23:42","modified_gmt":"2006-05-11T00:23:42","slug":"those-durn-christianists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html","title":{"rendered":"Those durn Christianists"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have been to weary to even begin to think through Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s explaination of his neoligism &quot;Christianist.&quot; Ramesh Ponnuru is doing the heavy lifting for the rest of us, though, over at <a href=\"http:\/\/corner.nationalreview.com\/\">The Corner<\/a>, which is all meshing together with his ongoing battle with Sullivan over Sullivan&#8217;s many comments over Ramesh&#8217;s new book &#8211; which he hasn&#8217;t read. <\/p>\n<p>Just start at the top and keep scrolling down. <a href=\"http:\/\/corner.nationalreview.com\/post\/?q=OTViYzQ3ZTY5MzEyM2IzMWFiNDIzMmI3ZWQwZjdhNmE=\">One sample:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p>His latest post exhibits most of the bad rhetorical habits I mentioned earlier today. Sullivan continues to treat positions he once took himself as beyond the pale\u2014note that dismissive reference to &quot;microscopic zygotes&quot;\u2014without even acknowledging that he once held them. Second, having piously claimed that the label &quot;Christianist&quot; is not intended to associate religious conservatives with violence and terrorism, he insinuates exactly such an association in his latest post. I cannot be too offended when Sullivan misrepresents my views, given his evident difficulty in keeping track of his own.<\/p>\n<p>Sullivan concludes by positing himself as a spokesman for &quot;mainstream Christians.&quot; It&#8217;s a poisonous claim\u2014as bad as the worst rhetoric that sometimes comes from religious conservatives. It&#8217;s also absurd. Same-sex marriage may or may not be a good idea, but the notion that it represents mainstream Christianity is pretty far-fetched.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/time.blogs.com\/daily_dish\/2006\/05\/christianists_f.html\">The post to which Ramesh is responding:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p>In all of this, the Christianists do not represent most Christians, although they have made great strides in the Vatican and in the fundamentalist leadership. I should stress: these people have every right to their views. They certainly have developed an arsenal of arguments and a body of thought to back them up. But this agenda, whatever else it is, cannot be described as mainstream Christianity. Its extremism, its enmeshment with partisan political power, its contempt for individual liberty, its certainty and arrogance and intolerance, demand that some other name be given to it. They have gotten away with too much for too long. It&#8217;s time for mainstream Christians, in both parties, to fight back. And we are. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"http:\/\/corner.nationalreview.com\/post\/?q=MzRhODhiMTExNTY2MmZmNjllNWUwYTI4OTc2YzYwODY=\">Ponnuru&#8217;s original response to the &quot;Christianist&quot; essay<\/a><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">(forgive me for working backwards. It&#8217;s late)<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">But the terms aren\u2019t at all parallel. If &quot;Christianist&quot; is truly to be the equivalent of &quot;Islamist,&quot; then it has to refer only to a tiny number of people who call themselves \u201cChristian reconstructionists\u201d or \u201ctheonomists\u201d\u2014people, that is, who think that American governments should impose Biblical law. If, on the other hand, &quot;Christianist&quot; is to refer to people who think abortion should be outlawed, same-sex marriage should not be accorded legal recognition, public schools should include prayer, and so forth, which is how Sullivan actually uses the term, then the parallel isn\u2019t to \u201cIslamists.\u201d It\u2019s to the vast majority of Muslims.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">In one of his <a href=\"http:\/\/time.blogs.com\/daily_dish\/2006\/05\/christianism_de_2.html\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">most recent posts<\/span><\/a>, Sullivan tries to maintain that the problem isn&#8217;t the positions of the &quot;Christianists,&quot; but the explicitly religious arguments they make for them. The same problem obtains, since, again, the vast majority of Muslims support various policies on explicitly religious grounds. But it&#8217;s obviously not true that Sullivan objects only to social conservatives&#8217; rhetoric. Making non-religious arguments against early-term abortion has, for example, led him to label me a &quot;religious fundamentalist.&quot; Here, again, we have a case of the spurious tiny distinction on which everything hangs. It&#8217;s okay for Sullivan&#8217;s opposition to the death penalty to be informed by his religious views. But the minute you take a religiously informed view that he does not share, you&#8217;re a theocrat.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">I would really, really like to see Sullivan and Ponnuru debate\/discuss this. I&#8217;d pay.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have been to weary to even begin to think through Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s explaination of his neoligism &quot;Christianist.&quot; Ramesh Ponnuru is doing the heavy lifting for the rest of us, though, over at The Corner, which is all meshing together with his ongoing battle with Sullivan over Sullivan&#8217;s many comments over Ramesh&#8217;s new book &#8211;&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":180,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2145","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Those durn Christianists - Via Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Those durn Christianists - Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I have been to weary to even begin to think through Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s explaination of his neoligism &quot;Christianist.&quot; Ramesh Ponnuru is doing the heavy lifting for the rest of us, though, over at The Corner, which is all meshing together with his ongoing battle with Sullivan over Sullivan&#8217;s many comments over Ramesh&#8217;s new book &#8211;&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-05-11T00:23:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"awelborn\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Those durn Christianists - Via Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Those durn Christianists - Via Media","og_description":"I have been to weary to even begin to think through Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s explaination of his neoligism &quot;Christianist.&quot; Ramesh Ponnuru is doing the heavy lifting for the rest of us, though, over at The Corner, which is all meshing together with his ongoing battle with Sullivan over Sullivan&#8217;s many comments over Ramesh&#8217;s new book &#8211;&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html","og_site_name":"Via Media","article_published_time":"2006-05-11T00:23:42+00:00","author":"awelborn","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html","name":"Those durn Christianists - Via Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-05-11T00:23:42+00:00","dateModified":"2006-05-11T00:23:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/05\/those-durn-christianists.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Those durn Christianists"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/","name":"Via Media","description":"Amy Welborn","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a","name":"awelborn","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","caption":"awelborn"},"description":"Amy Welborn was born in 1960, the only child of a now-retired professor of political science, a teacher-librarian-artist mother,deceased since 2001, was a teacher, librarian and artist. The Catholicism comes from her side. Amy grew up in a number of places - Indiana - Washington, DC - Lubbock Texas - Arlington, Virginia - DeKalb, Illinois - Lawrence, Kansas - and Knoxville, Tennessee, where the family settled in 1973. She attended Knoxville Catholic High School, then the University of Tennessee where she majored in history. She received an MA in Church History from Vanderbilt University, where she wrote a thesis on the changing role of women in 19th century American Protestantism, and the ways Scripture was used to justify those changes. She worked as as a teacher in Catholic high schools and a Parish Director of Religious Education and started writing for the diocesan press - the Florida Catholic - in 1988. Amy has written columns for Our Sunday Visitor and Catholic News Service at times over the past twenty years. Her articles have been published in venues ranging from Our Sunday Visitor to the New York Times to Commonweal. She has written 17 books. 18, if you included the as yet tragically unpublished novel. Amy has five children, ranging in age from 26 to 4 and was married to Michael Dubruiel, who died unexpectedly in February 2009. She lives in Birmingham, Alabama.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/author\/awelborn"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/180"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2145"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2145\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}