{"id":1826,"date":"2007-05-03T08:34:53","date_gmt":"2007-05-03T08:34:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html"},"modified":"2007-05-03T08:34:53","modified_gmt":"2007-05-03T08:34:53","slug":"futile-care-in-texas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html","title":{"rendered":"Futile Care in Texas"},"content":{"rendered":"

In 1999, then-Governor George Bush of Texas signed a bill that enshrined what is called "futile care" policy into Texas law. The idea is that hospitals have the right to stop patient treatment if their ethics committee determine it is futile, even if the family of a patient disagrees. Wesley Smith<\/a> takes up the story:<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Eventually a compromise was worked out, giving families ten days to find an alternative institution to provide care once a hospital ethics committee ruled that treatment for a patient should be terminated. Governor George W. Bush eventually signed the bill into law in 1999 after right to life groups agreed to the compromise, never dreaming that patient transfers would become almost impossible to secure. <\/p>\n

That is where matters sat for several years until a few Texas hospitals recently began exercising their prerogatives under the law. Finding it impossible to obtain transfers within the allotted time, affected families resisted, unwilling to meekly submit to the value judgments of ethics committees and doctors that their loved ones\u2019 lives were no longer worth sustaining. For example, the family of Andrea Clark mounted a very public \u2014 and ultimately successful \u2014 campaign<\/span><\/a> against an attempted futility imposition by St. Luke\u2019s Hospital in Houston. Currently, another futile care controversy is raging in Austin, where the mother of the terminally ill \u201cBaby Emilio\u201d Gonzales has obtained a temporary restraining order preventing the Children\u2019s Hospital of Austin from unilaterally cutting off his life-sustaining treatment.<\/p>\n

In response to these and other controversial public cases, legislation was introduced in the Texas Legislature (SB. 439 \/ HB. 1094) to eradicate the ten-day rule; it would institute instead policies enacted in eleven other states that require hospitals, in futile-care cases, to continue wanted life-sustaining treatment until a transfer can be effected. The bills looked as if they would quickly be passed \u2014 that is, until the Texas Catholic Conference unexpectedly came out in support of Futile Care Theory.<\/p>\n

Testifying on behalf of an alternative bill (HB. 3474) that would extend the ten-day limit to 21 days \u2014 while at the same time permitting hospitals to refuse to provide new levels of treatment that might be required during the waiting period \u2014 Bishop Gregory Aymond of the Diocese of Austin, speaking on behalf of all Texas bishops, declared that hospitals, rather than patients\/families, should have the ultimate say over whether a patient\u2019s life is maintained:<\/p>\n

\n

We believe, and the tradition of our Church has always taught, that a person should be allowed to die with dignity and have a peaceful death. We believe that that is in conformity to God\u2019s will and that God is the one who chooses life and death. It is the teaching of the Church that we should not interfere with that. We also realize that sometimes families, through no fault of their own, are really not able to make those decisions because of their involvement, because of the emotions.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In other words, according to the Texas bishops, even if the patient had appointed a surrogate in an medical directive who instructs that the patient\u2019s life be maintained; even if family members, acting on their intimate understanding of the patient\u2019s values and desires, want treatment continued \u2014 Bishop Aymond, sounding very much like utilitarian secular bioethicists who usually promote Futile Care Theory, sniffs that they can\u2019t be trusted to make the right decision due to \u201cemotions.\u201d <\/p>\n

People in Texas whom I have talked to about this revolting development suspect that the bishops are hearkening to the desires of the Texas Catholic Health Association, which represents Catholic hospitals. This wouldn\u2019t be surprising, given that some Catholic hospitals have a history of backing Futile Care Theory. <\/p>\n

snip<\/em><\/p>\n

Near the end of his testimony, Bishop Aymond quoted the 1995 encyclical The Gospel of Life<\/em>, in which John Paul II stated that in situations \u201cwhen death is clearly imminent and inevitable, one can certainly in conscience refuse forms of treatment that would only secure precarious prolongation of life, so long as the normal care due to the sick person in similar cases is not interrupted.\u201d But surely, John Paul II was referring to the right under Catholic moral teaching of patients and families<\/em> to choose to forgo treatment \u2014 not the right of hospital ethics committee to impose <\/em>such decisions upon the unwilling. <\/p>\n

If patient autonomy is to retain any real meaning; if we are to prevent subjective and invidious quality-of-life value judgments from being imposed upon the sickest and most vulnerable among us \u2014 it is crucial that the Texas legislature kill the futile-care law\u2019s 10-day rule once and for all. Unfortunately, the Texas bishops and Catholic Conference are impeding the success of this important work. In so doing, they are opening the door to the imposition of medical discrimination against those judged by strangers on ethics committees to have lives not worth living. Somehow, I don\u2019t think this is what John Paul II had in mind<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The website of the Texas Catholic Conference<\/a><\/p>\n

I know we have lots of Texas readers, including one who is a physician in Austin – add your two cents, please, and help us understand what is going on here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In 1999, then-Governor George Bush of Texas signed a bill that enshrined what is called "futile care" policy into Texas law. The idea is that hospitals have the right to stop patient treatment if their ethics committee determine it is futile, even if the family of a patient disagrees. Wesley Smith takes up the story:…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":180,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\nFutile Care in Texas - Via Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Futile Care in Texas - Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In 1999, then-Governor George Bush of Texas signed a bill that enshrined what is called "futile care" policy into Texas law. The idea is that hospitals have the right to stop patient treatment if their ethics committee determine it is futile, even if the family of a patient disagrees. Wesley Smith takes up the story:…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-05-03T08:34:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"awelborn\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Futile Care in Texas - Via Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Futile Care in Texas - Via Media","og_description":"In 1999, then-Governor George Bush of Texas signed a bill that enshrined what is called "futile care" policy into Texas law. The idea is that hospitals have the right to stop patient treatment if their ethics committee determine it is futile, even if the family of a patient disagrees. Wesley Smith takes up the story:…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html","og_site_name":"Via Media","article_published_time":"2007-05-03T08:34:53+00:00","author":"awelborn","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html","name":"Futile Care in Texas - Via Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-05-03T08:34:53+00:00","dateModified":"2007-05-03T08:34:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/05\/futile-care-in-texas.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Futile Care in Texas"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/","name":"Via Media","description":"Amy Welborn","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a","name":"awelborn","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","caption":"awelborn"},"description":"Amy Welborn was born in 1960, the only child of a now-retired professor of political science, a teacher-librarian-artist mother,deceased since 2001, was a teacher, librarian and artist. The Catholicism comes from her side. Amy grew up in a number of places - Indiana - Washington, DC - Lubbock Texas - Arlington, Virginia - DeKalb, Illinois - Lawrence, Kansas - and Knoxville, Tennessee, where the family settled in 1973. She attended Knoxville Catholic High School, then the University of Tennessee where she majored in history. She received an MA in Church History from Vanderbilt University, where she wrote a thesis on the changing role of women in 19th century American Protestantism, and the ways Scripture was used to justify those changes. She worked as as a teacher in Catholic high schools and a Parish Director of Religious Education and started writing for the diocesan press - the Florida Catholic - in 1988. Amy has written columns for Our Sunday Visitor and Catholic News Service at times over the past twenty years. Her articles have been published in venues ranging from Our Sunday Visitor to the New York Times to Commonweal. She has written 17 books. 18, if you included the as yet tragically unpublished novel. Amy has five children, ranging in age from 26 to 4 and was married to Michael Dubruiel, who died unexpectedly in February 2009. She lives in Birmingham, Alabama.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/author\/awelborn"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/180"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1826"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1826\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}