{"id":134,"date":"2007-08-28T12:44:28","date_gmt":"2007-08-28T12:44:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html"},"modified":"2007-08-28T12:44:28","modified_gmt":"2007-08-28T12:44:28","slug":"apologia-pro-apologia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html","title":{"rendered":"Apologia pro apologia"},"content":{"rendered":"

There are many ways to evangelize and catechize, many elements of both. One of the problems, both past and present, in figuring out how to do both of these things is the temptation to push everyone through a narrow gate -but the wrong kind of narrow gate. The gate that presumes all people are the same, that they learn in the same way, that the God-shaped holes they are trying to fill are exactly the same.
\nWhich doesn’t work because whoever dug those holes used different shovels and worked with varying degrees of ferocity to varying depths.
\nThis has been the theme of most of\u00a0my conversations with my favorite Youth Ministry Guru, who now works in a parish doing evangelization. When churches deal with “youth” they want to place them all in a single box and then find a ministry “program” that can keep them there. Forgetting, of course, that while some youth might be turned on by icebreakers and fun, the same activities might prompt other youth to run for the hills. But that’s another subject.
\nSo it is with the task of evangelization and catechesis in general. It takes all kinds and a variety of efforts, which seems to me a basic fact that any Catholic should not even have to learn, considering that the Catholic life is\u00a0in this sense almost defined by variety, most obviously embodied in our religious orders, as well as various spiritual movements past and present. Communion and Liberation is not Opus Dei, and that is fine.
\nSo when we take it to a less, say, organized or formal level, the same truth applies. In some circumstances more affectively-oriented approaches are called for, in others more cognitive. I have never, ever understood why this is a big deal for some people, or, more accurately, why some working in one approach have a need to disparage another approach. Yes, if someone is claiming that their approach is the Be All And End All and is The Solution – sure, they deserve to be disparaged.
\nSo take the general distaste for apologetics. Oh, a lot of you really dig apologetics, but to be honest it’s got a bad rap out there in professional Catholic land, and you know it.\u00a0 Apologetics should not be the primary focus of anyone’s catechesis or faith formation, but it is a legitimate, important aspect of catechesis. To me, it’s simple. Things exist for a reason, mostly because of need. So if apologetics exists and, in the present day, seems to be flourishing, there’s a reason. Instead of sneering at the apologists, why not tackle the reason that apologetics websites and books seem to be so popular? Maybe because people have…you know…questions?
\nAll of that is by way of introduction to another, smaller point, a point to consider when evaluating these different modes of talking about and passing on faith.
\nPerhaps I am delusional, but it strikes me, in reading and listening to\u00a0many contemporary evangelical, emergent, and\u00a0even Anglican-centered conversations over the past few years, all of this in the added, interesting context of Pope Benedict’s excellent catechetical style and the growing interest in things papal over the past couple of years, that there is an odd little potential Catholic moment here.
\nThe questions about authority are mounting in many Christian traditions, as some go off the rails, and not just because of the homosexual wars that every mainstream denomination is fighting. They are mounting in evangelicalism as the Word Faith and emergent forms of Protestantism bear heavy and sharp criticism from fellow Protestants, leaving some observers wondering, “on whose authority” can any of this be critiqued? Interest in ritual and traditional worship, even monasticism, the Divine Office and praying beads is rising among Protestants. Serious evangelicals continue to be deeply interested in Patristics. Some are questioning the relationship between Protestantism of all kinds, and the culture, for various reasons.
\nIn this context, the people who are exploring these issues are serious Christians. They are not strangers to Jesus. Their “affective” faith is strong\u00a0 but they are wondering about things.
\nAnd sometimes their wondering leads them, if not to the door, at least to the outside gate of the Catholic Church. Sometimes they seriously explore it, sometimes they can’t even imagine doing so and quickly turn away. But in many of these conversations and musings and explorations, one of the points you run across over and over is that the Catholic Church is appealing for countless reasons that go very deep, but what is off-putting, in the end, is its “un-Scriptural doctrines.” That perception is a real deal-breaker<\/strong>. You can say all sorts of things about it, and suggest all kinds of approaches to remedying it, but one thing seems clear, as you listen:
\nApologetics and other ways of talking about and explaining you know….doctrine and teachings…..might just have a place.\u00a0 Because seekers are asking.
\nTo answer those questions, lovingly and with an open spirit…that’s a good <\/em>thing.
\nYou might even call it…. seeker-friendly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There are many ways to evangelize and catechize, many elements of both. One of the problems, both past and present, in figuring out how to do both of these things is the temptation to push everyone through a narrow gate -but the wrong kind of narrow gate. The gate that presumes all people are the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":180,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-religion"],"yoast_head":"\nApologia pro apologia - Via Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Apologia pro apologia - Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"There are many ways to evangelize and catechize, many elements of both. One of the problems, both past and present, in figuring out how to do both of these things is the temptation to push everyone through a narrow gate -but the wrong kind of narrow gate. The gate that presumes all people are the…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-08-28T12:44:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"awelborn\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Apologia pro apologia - Via Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Apologia pro apologia - Via Media","og_description":"There are many ways to evangelize and catechize, many elements of both. One of the problems, both past and present, in figuring out how to do both of these things is the temptation to push everyone through a narrow gate -but the wrong kind of narrow gate. The gate that presumes all people are the…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html","og_site_name":"Via Media","article_published_time":"2007-08-28T12:44:28+00:00","author":"awelborn","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html","name":"Apologia pro apologia - Via Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-08-28T12:44:28+00:00","dateModified":"2007-08-28T12:44:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2007\/08\/apologia-pro-apologia.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Apologia pro apologia"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/","name":"Via Media","description":"Amy Welborn","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a","name":"awelborn","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","caption":"awelborn"},"description":"Amy Welborn was born in 1960, the only child of a now-retired professor of political science, a teacher-librarian-artist mother,deceased since 2001, was a teacher, librarian and artist. The Catholicism comes from her side. Amy grew up in a number of places - Indiana - Washington, DC - Lubbock Texas - Arlington, Virginia - DeKalb, Illinois - Lawrence, Kansas - and Knoxville, Tennessee, where the family settled in 1973. She attended Knoxville Catholic High School, then the University of Tennessee where she majored in history. She received an MA in Church History from Vanderbilt University, where she wrote a thesis on the changing role of women in 19th century American Protestantism, and the ways Scripture was used to justify those changes. She worked as as a teacher in Catholic high schools and a Parish Director of Religious Education and started writing for the diocesan press - the Florida Catholic - in 1988. Amy has written columns for Our Sunday Visitor and Catholic News Service at times over the past twenty years. Her articles have been published in venues ranging from Our Sunday Visitor to the New York Times to Commonweal. She has written 17 books. 18, if you included the as yet tragically unpublished novel. Amy has five children, ranging in age from 26 to 4 and was married to Michael Dubruiel, who died unexpectedly in February 2009. She lives in Birmingham, Alabama.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/author\/awelborn"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/180"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}