{"id":375,"date":"2008-10-16T14:56:10","date_gmt":"2008-10-16T14:56:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html"},"modified":"2008-10-16T14:56:10","modified_gmt":"2008-10-16T14:56:10","slug":"whos-right-about-the-born-aliv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html","title":{"rendered":"McCain Had a Point About the Health Exemption on Abortion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Though it was a <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/the-final-debate.html\">terrible moment politically for McCain<\/a> when he mocked Obama for supporting a health exception to a late term abortion ban, the Republican actually has a substantive point.  The &#8220;health&#8221; exception has in the past been used to keep almost all third trimester abortions legal.<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s often forgotten that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tourolaw.edu\/Patch\/Roe\/\">Roe v. Wade<\/a> allows states to ban abortion in the third trimester. Specifically, it could &#8220;regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.&#8221;<br \/>\nIt was the companion decision to Roe called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supct\/html\/historics\/USSC_CR_0410_0179_ZS.html\">Doe v. Bolten<\/a> that then gave &#8220;health&#8221; such a broad defintition that subsequent courts have, in effect, legalized most third trimester abortion:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;[M]edical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors &#8211; physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman&#8217;s age &#8211; relevant to the wellbeing of the patient. All these factors may relate to health.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, substantively, it was not at all absurd for McCain to suggest that supporting a late term abortion ban with a health exception, as Obama said, may not mean anything at all.<br \/>\nIronically, Obama might secretly agree with McCain&#8217;s point, at least in part. Earlier in the campaign he seemed to indicate that he frowned upon the health exception being stretched to include too many abortion.  &#8220;I don&#8217;t think that &#8216;mental distress&#8217; qualifies as the health of the mother,&#8221; he told Relevant magazine. &#8220;I think it has to be a serious physical issue that arises in pregnancy, where there are real, significant problems to the mother carrying that child to term&#8230; &#8221;<br \/>\nAfter pro-choice groups complained, Obama quickly <a href=\"http:\/\/www.swamppolitics.com\/news\/politics\/blog\/2008\/07\/obama_backs_late_abortions_on.html\">clarified that he meant:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;In the past there has been some fear on the part of people who, not only people who are anti-abortion, but people who may be in the middle, that that means that if a woman just doesn&#8217;t feel good then that is an exception. That&#8217;s never been the case.<br \/>\n&#8220;I don&#8217;t think that is how it has been interpreted. My only point is that in an area like partial-birth abortion having a mental, having a health exception can be defined rigorously. It can be defined through physical health, It can be defined by serious clinical mental-health diseases. It is not just a matter of feeling blue. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s how pro-choice folks have interpreted it. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s how the courts have interpreted it and I think that&#8217;s important to emphasize and understand.&#8221; <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So it now remains an open question: what exactly does Obama mean by &#8220;defined rigorously&#8221;?<br \/>\nP.s. John McCain attacked Barack Obama for allowing infants to die by opposing the Born Alive bill in Illinois.  Obama said that&#8217;s not true.   My take on <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/09\/making-sense-of-the-born-alive.html\">who&#8217;s right on the &#8220;born alive&#8221; issue.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Though it was a terrible moment politically for McCain when he mocked Obama for supporting a health exception to a late term abortion ban, the Republican actually has a substantive point. The &#8220;health&#8221; exception has in the past been used to keep almost all third trimester abortions legal. It&#8217;s often forgotten that Roe v. Wade&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-375","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>McCain Had a Point About the Health Exemption on Abortion - Steven Waldman<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"McCain Had a Point About the Health Exemption on Abortion - Steven Waldman\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Though it was a terrible moment politically for McCain when he mocked Obama for supporting a health exception to a late term abortion ban, the Republican actually has a substantive point. The &#8220;health&#8221; exception has in the past been used to keep almost all third trimester abortions legal. It&#8217;s often forgotten that Roe v. Wade&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Steven Waldman\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-16T14:56:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"swaldman\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"McCain Had a Point About the Health Exemption on Abortion - Steven Waldman","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"McCain Had a Point About the Health Exemption on Abortion - Steven Waldman","og_description":"Though it was a terrible moment politically for McCain when he mocked Obama for supporting a health exception to a late term abortion ban, the Republican actually has a substantive point. The &#8220;health&#8221; exception has in the past been used to keep almost all third trimester abortions legal. It&#8217;s often forgotten that Roe v. Wade&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html","og_site_name":"Steven Waldman","article_published_time":"2008-10-16T14:56:10+00:00","author":"swaldman","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html","name":"McCain Had a Point About the Health Exemption on Abortion - Steven Waldman","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-16T14:56:10+00:00","dateModified":"2008-10-16T14:56:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/#\/schema\/person\/f14bd19925fcfcd0bd7c74a678fddded"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/2008\/10\/whos-right-about-the-born-aliv.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"McCain Had a Point About the Health Exemption on Abortion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/","name":"Steven Waldman","description":"Author of 'Founding Faith'","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/#\/schema\/person\/f14bd19925fcfcd0bd7c74a678fddded","name":"swaldman","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/e7f\/e7f50c10d0832a00d2b7690a72d45b5ex96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/e7f\/e7f50c10d0832a00d2b7690a72d45b5ex96.jpg","caption":"swaldman"},"description":"Steven Waldman is the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Founder of Beliefnet. He's also the author of the Founding Faith: Politics, Providence, and the Birth of Religious Freedom in America, which has been published by Random House. Before co-founding Beliefnet in 1999, Waldman was a political journalist, serving as National Editor of U.S. News & World Report and National Correspondent for Newsweek. His writings have appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, National Review, The Atlantic, Slate, and many others.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/author\/swaldman"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=375"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/stevenwaldman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}