{"id":109,"date":"2009-08-31T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-31T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html"},"modified":"2014-05-19T09:16:08","modified_gmt":"2014-05-19T13:16:08","slug":"decent-swordfish","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html","title":{"rendered":"Decent Swordfish"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"swordfish.jpg\"<\/span><\/p>\n

Source: <\/b>FotoosVanRobin<\/a> \/ Flickr \/ All Rights Reserved<\/p>\n

Every Monday, “Science and the Sacred” features an essay from
\none of The BioLogos Foundation’s co-presidents: Karl Giberson and
\nDarrel Falk. Today’s entry was written by Karl Giberson.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

I love the show Frasier<\/em> and watch it most nights before I go to bed. Last night’s episode had Frasier whining about how nothing was up to his standards at the resort where he was trying to score points with his latest love interest.<\/p>\n

Frasier was particularly upset that the fancy fish entrees on the menu had run out. The waiter said that he was sorry but that they did have a “decent swordfish.” Frasier responded with condescension, ridiculing this suggestion and making it sound like “decent swordfish” was fare suitable only for boorish philistines. He even managed to pronounce the proffered entr\u00e9e in such a way that it sounded unappetizing.<\/p>\n

Frasier’s sneering condescension put me in mind of some of the complaints that have been leveled at the BioLogos project to find harmony between science and faith. I speak of the way that that the label “accommodationist” is being applied as if it were a warning from the FDA that these ideas are not fit for human consumption. On Richard Dawkins site there is a long discussion called “The Big Accommodationism Debate,” with contributions from various critics who blog about accommodationism as if it is some kind of plague.<\/p>\n

But accommodationism, like “decent swordfish,” should not be sneered at. To accommodate<\/em> is good. It’s a virtue, like honesty, diligence, and kindness. Imagine a father going into a hotel on a rainy night hoping they have room for him and his tired family. He comes out and announces, “Thank goodness, but they are not accommodating. I would hate to have stopped at an accommodationist motel.” Does this make sense? Does it make sense not to invite Aunt Clara for Thanksgiving because she is too accommodating?<\/p>\n

To accommodate<\/em> simply means to “provide what the occasion needs.” Hotels accommodate<\/em> guests when they have room for them; car dealers accommodate<\/em> customers by providing them with appropriate cars. Polite hosts accommodate<\/em> their dinner guests by not talking about how they came on the wrong day, or how their clothes are so out of fashion.<\/p>\n

In a pluralistic democracy accommodationism is critically important for civil discourse. America has made great strides in accommodating the many viewpoints that have a place at our national table. We have particular words and phrases that we use and don’t use to talk about African Americans, gays, women, the disabled, Jews, the elderly, and so on. The very atheists whining about the accommodationism of BioLogos are asking us to start calling them brights, because “atheist” sounds, you know, so negative…<\/p>\n

The BioLogos project is proud to be labeled accommodationist, for that is exactly how we see ourselves. We believe that science and faith can and should accommodate each other. They are not the same, so they need not be equated or assimilated, but they do need to co-exist. <\/p>\n

As scientists we understand that natural history does not testify to an endless series of supernatural interventions. We appreciate that our faith traditions have come to accommodate this fact about the world and adjusted accordingly. As religious believers we understand that the world is meaningful and we reject the claim that science has squeezed out all meaning from nature. Our science can accommodate<\/em> the belief that the world is not without purpose, for science has no reason whatsoever to even be talking about purpose, much less claiming to have proved it is not there.<\/p>\n

We plead with our colleagues in the scientific community to refrain from talking about science as if it is all encompassing and capable of adjudicating questions of purpose; and we plead with our fellow believers to refrain from using their theological beliefs to explain all of reality, as if the Bible was a science text. If we do this then perhaps those two perspectives can indeed accommodate each other.<\/p>\n

And then, of course, we can all sit down together and enjoy a nice meal of decent swordfish.<\/p>\n

\n<\/p>\n

\nShare<\/a>
\n|<\/span>
\n<\/a>
\n<\/a>
\n<\/a>
\n<\/a>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Source: FotoosVanRobin \/ Flickr \/ All Rights Reserved Every Monday, “Science and the Sacred” features an essay from one of The BioLogos Foundation’s co-presidents: Karl Giberson and Darrel Falk. Today’s entry was written by Karl Giberson. I love the show Frasier and watch it most nights before I go to bed. Last night’s episode had…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":366,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-weekly-feature"],"yoast_head":"\nDecent Swordfish - Science and the Sacred<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Decent Swordfish - Science and the Sacred\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Source: FotoosVanRobin \/ Flickr \/ All Rights Reserved Every Monday, “Science and the Sacred” features an essay from one of The BioLogos Foundation’s co-presidents: Karl Giberson and Darrel Falk. Today’s entry was written by Karl Giberson. I love the show Frasier and watch it most nights before I go to bed. Last night’s episode had…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Science and the Sacred\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-31T08:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-19T13:16:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/scienceandthesacred\/files\/import\/swordfish.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"kgiberson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Decent Swordfish - Science and the Sacred","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Decent Swordfish - Science and the Sacred","og_description":"Source: FotoosVanRobin \/ Flickr \/ All Rights Reserved Every Monday, “Science and the Sacred” features an essay from one of The BioLogos Foundation’s co-presidents: Karl Giberson and Darrel Falk. Today’s entry was written by Karl Giberson. I love the show Frasier and watch it most nights before I go to bed. Last night’s episode had…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html","og_site_name":"Science and the Sacred","article_published_time":"2009-08-31T08:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-19T13:16:08+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/scienceandthesacred\/files\/import\/swordfish.jpg"}],"author":"kgiberson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html","name":"Decent Swordfish - Science and the Sacred","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/scienceandthesacred\/files\/import\/swordfish.jpg","datePublished":"2009-08-31T08:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-19T13:16:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/#\/schema\/person\/395f15adadc9fd2952302ceb787d1bce"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/scienceandthesacred\/files\/import\/swordfish.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/scienceandthesacred\/files\/import\/swordfish.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/2009\/08\/decent-swordfish.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Decent Swordfish"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/","name":"Science and the Sacred","description":"The BioLogos Foundation","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/#\/schema\/person\/395f15adadc9fd2952302ceb787d1bce","name":"kgiberson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"kgiberson"},"description":"Executive Vice President of BioLogos Karl Giberson is an internationally known scholar of science-and-religion and one of America\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s leading participants in the creation\/evolution controversy. He was the founding editor of Science & Theology News, the leading publication in its field until it ceased publication in 2006, and editor-in-chief of Science & Spirit magazine from 2003-2006. He has published over a hundred articles, reviews, and essays, both technical and popular, and written four books: Worlds Apart: The Unholy War Between Science and Religion (1993), Species of Origins: America's Search for a Creation Story (2002, with Don Yerxa), Oracles of Science: Celebrity Scientists Versus God and Religion (2007, with Mariano Artigas), and Saving Darwin: How to Be a Christian and Believe in Evolution (2008). His 5th book, The Anointed: America\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Evangelical Experts (with historian Randall Stephens) is under contract with Harvard University Press. Dr. Giberson has written for Salon.com, Edge.org, Discover, Perspectives on Science & Faith, Books & Culture, Christianity Today, Journal of Christian History, Zygon, and others. He has given invited lectures on science and religion at many venues, including Oxford University, the Etore Majorana Center in Sicily, as well as colleges and universities in the United States. His primary research focus is the history and sociology of the creation-evolution controversy and in 2006 he lectured at the Vatican on \"America's Ongoing Hostility to Darwinism.\" Saving Darwin was recognized by the Washington Post as a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Best of 2008\u00e2\u20ac\u009d book. Dr. Giberson has been on the faculty of Eastern Nazarene College since 1984, where he teaches interdisciplinary honors seminars and the history of science. He is also the director of the Forum on Faith and Science at Gordon College, and co-director of the Venice Summer School on Science & Religion.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/author\/kgiberson"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/366"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":741,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109\/revisions\/741"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/scienceandthesacred\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}