I know you’ve all been waiting for me to explain why I get to drive around for the next two years with a “Don’t Blame Me I’m From Connecticut” bumper sticker. Here goes.<\/p>\n
The citizens who showed up at polls in the Nutmeg State<\/a> last Tuesday were somewhat older, whiter, richer, and more college-educated than their counterparts in the rest of the country<\/a>. They were also a whole lot bluer. All five (Democratic) members of Congress retained their seats, a Democrat was chosen as Chris Dodd’s successor, and it looks like we’ll have a Democratic governor for the first time in 20 years. <\/p>\n Why did Nutmeg voters tell exit pollsters that they wanted government Well, more Democrats than Republicans voted (in the rest of the country the proportions were equal), and the number of self-described liberals almost equaled the number of conservatives (as opposed to being outnumbered more than 2-1). But these facts beg the question. The one salient social issue where he put daylight Speaking of Bridgeport, a month ago Bishop William E. Lori delivered himself of an extended pastoral letter<\/a> for the election season entitled “Let Freedom Ring.” In it, the bishop waxed eloquent on the Danbury Baptists of yore, who wrote<\/a> Lori went on at length regarding the evils Update:<\/b> The Hayes jury returns<\/a> a sentence of death.<\/p>\n
\nto do more rather than less (50 percent to 46 percent) when nationwide
\nit was less rather than more (56 percent to 38 percent)? Why did they
\noppose the Tea Party 42-35 when all voters supported it 40-31? Why were
\nObama’s approval numbers 54-45 instead of 45-54? What gives? <\/p>\n
Connecticut is a small, densely populated state with scores of municipalities–186 towns and cities where residents tend to know their elected officials and participate in policy-making. If, to someone who’s lived in Massachusetts and Georgia, Connecticut politics seems smaller than life, it’s because all politics here is really, really local. The disfunctionality of state government has to do with an excess of local control, not the opposite. If you’re from the government, we really do think you’re here to help–or should be. In a word, Connecticut voters weren’t about to buy the anti-government goods the GOP was selling so hard this year. <\/p>\n
\nNot
\nthat they’ve been inclined to buy the Republican goods of the past few
\ncycles either. The state’s Catholic plurality, remembering when it was
\nvictimized by a Yankee majority, has little interest in imposing its
\nchurch’s views on abortion and same-sex marriage on the rest of the
\npopulace. The GOP moral values playbook just doesn’t play here. This
\nyear, GOP gubernatorial candidate Tom Foley, a Protestant, pronounced
\nhimself pro-choice and promised not to mess with the state’s same-sex
\nmarriage law.<\/p>\n
\nbetween himself and Democratic opponent Dan Malloy was the death
\npenalty. There, Foley promised to follow the lead of current Gov. Jody
\nRell, who vetoed legislation that would have put an end to it. Malloy, a
\nCatholic and death penalty opponent, has said<\/a>
\nhe’d have signed the bill. The issue had salience because through the fall,
\nConnecticut has been riveted by the murder trial of Stephen Hayes,
\ncharged with committing one of the most horrific home invasions in U.S.
\nhistory. (Having voted to convict, the jury as of this writing<\/a> was still deciding whether to impose the death penalty.) The point is:
\nin a very close contest sufficiently marred by voting irregularities in
\nBridgeport that it may go to court, the death penalty may well have cost
\nMalloy some votes.<\/p>\n
\nto Thomas Jefferson in hopes that, by emphasizing humankind’s natural
\nright to religious liberty, they might get some help in overturning
\nConnecticut’s requirement that all taxpayers help pay for the support of
\nsome religious body. <\/p>\n
\nof abortion and same-sex marriage, alleging that the state’s positions
\non both endanger religious liberty. But respecting the death penalty–a
\nmajor concern of the United State Conference of Catholic Bishops re-emphasized in September<\/a>–he
\nhad nary a word to say. Presumably doing so might have encouraged some
\nof the lay faithful and clergy to vote for a pro-choice Catholic: The
\nHorror, the Horror! (Lori is, be it noted, cut from the cloth of
\nChaput.) So as Connecticut prepares itself to take a significant step in
\nthe direction of the “culture of life,” the state’s most politically
\nengaged hierarch will not be able to take credit.<\/p>\n