In his commentary “More Drooling Idiocy on Rick Perry\u2019s Faith,” it’s not too difficult to figure out where political observer Leon H. Wolf stands.<\/p>\n
“A fairly good indicator that Rick Perry will make a strong general election candidate is the desperation you can smell in the left\u2019s opening salvo of attacks against him,” proclaims Wolf. “The early leader for the genre\u2019s exemplar is this piece from the formerly proud the Atlantic<\/em> (which has sadly been reduced to a gay gossip site and anti-Semitic conspiracy newsletter).”<\/p>\n Wolf writes for\u00a0the right-of-center news\u00a0website Red State. Texas Governor Perry made this weekend’s announcement of his presidential candidacy televised worldwide with him standing behind a Red State podium.<\/p>\n So, what Atlantic<\/em> article is Wolf upset about? \u00a0He explains:<\/p>\n “The author, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, first attempts lamely to argue that Rick Perry\u2019s private prayer session from last Sunday was unconstitutional because it was Christian, a contention so stupid that even Doug Mataconis would not make it. However, Townsend\u2019s heart is not really in that contention, so Townsend moves on quickly to her second (and contradictory) point: that Rick Perry is not really a Christian at all.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Here’s what Townsend wrote:<\/p>\n The press has traditionally been unwilling to question politicians about their religion. But in Perry\u2019s case, Christianity is front and center on his platform. I hope David Gregory will ask him some of the following questions when he next appears on “Meet the Press,” and that other members of the media won\u2019t shy away from them either.<\/p>\n I see a fundamental inconsistency between Perry\u2019s concerted opposition to government social programs and his promotion of himself as a Christian politician. When asked about the impact of Texas\u2019s low-tax, low-service policies on the poor, he suggested that people who wanted more government services could find them in New York or California.<\/p>\n Christ teaches us to feed the hungry and care for the sick, not to abandon them. Perhaps Gov. Perry hasn\u2019t read that part of the Bible where Christ admonishes us to care for \u201cthe least among us.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Wolfe rebuts:<\/p>\n Townsend\u2019s contention that \u201cChristianity is front and center on his platform\u201d is completely unsupported by any evidence other than the fact that Perry led a prayer in which Christ was mentioned. In this respect he is completely indistinguishable from literally every single President who has ever served in the history of the nation, including Obama, Clinton, and Carter. There\u2019s certainly nothing unusual or unprecedented about Rick Perry\u2019s willingness to pray in public such that his faith is subject to more criticism than would normally be appropriate, but that is ultimately beside the point. Townsend\u2019s criticism shows that she has no understanding whatsoever of what Christianity requires of the Christian, and her criticism is completely without merit. As you might have guessed, Townsend\u2019s contention is that Perry is not Christian because he is not very socialist.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Townsend is correct that Christ did indeed admonish Christians to feed the hungry and care for the sick. In fact, that is one of the central responsibilities of Christians. The entire point of this admonition, if one reads further into the passage, is that in so doing, the Christian reflects the heart of Christ by selflessly giving of him or herself to others. Supporting government services to the poor, however, reflects something a little different: a complete unwillingness to sacrifice one\u2019s own<\/em> money for the poor, in favor of having the government take it from other people<\/em> (read, the \u201crich\u201d) and give it to the poor. It takes a cynical heart completely unfamiliar with the teachings of Christ to suggest that God would be pleased with a no-cost vote for confiscatory taxes on other people to pay for the poor.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n If this is the opening salvo, this campaign should be very interesting, indeed.<\/p>\n\n