<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Beliefnet News</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/news</provider_url><author_name>nsymmonds</author_name><author_url>https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/news/author/nsymmonds</author_url><title>Fairness Doctrine is Still Dead, But Groups Are Still Worried</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="QpuTaQ0OHA"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/news/2009/02/fairness-doctrine-is-still-dea"&gt;Fairness Doctrine is Still Dead, But Groups Are Still Worried&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/news/2009/02/fairness-doctrine-is-still-dea/embed#?secret=QpuTaQ0OHA" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Fairness Doctrine is Still Dead, But Groups Are Still Worried&#x201D; &#x2014; Beliefnet News" data-secret="QpuTaQ0OHA" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>WASHINGTON &#x2014; A move to require broadcasters to provide equal time to all sides of controversial issues has religious radio programs worried, even though no formal proposal has been introduced and the White House likely wouldn&#x2019;t support it. At issue is the idea of reinstating the Fairness Doctrine, which policed public airwaves from 1949 to&hellip;</description></oembed>
