{"id":518,"date":"2008-08-25T01:01:02","date_gmt":"2008-08-25T01:01:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html"},"modified":"2008-08-25T01:01:02","modified_gmt":"2008-08-25T01:01:02","slug":"where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html","title":{"rendered":"Where Do We Go From Here? Section 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"right\">Part 14 of series: <em>The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited<br \/>\n<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.markdroberts.com\/htmfiles\/resources\/endofpcusa2008.htm#aug2508\" target=\"_blank\">Permalink for this post<\/a> \/ <a href=\"http:\/\/www.markdroberts.com\/htmfiles\/resources\/endofpcusa2008.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Permalink for this series<\/a><br \/>\nSo far in this series on <em>The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited<\/em> I have argued that we members of the PCUSA cannot get along as a unified denomination because of our deep theological divisions about many issues, most pointedly the issue of gay ordination. I have also argued that a denomination is not \u201cthe church\u201d or even \u201ca church,\u201d but rather an organization of churches that share enough in common to be committed to each other. This \u201cin common\u201d part should surely include core theology and sense of mission. If my two main arguments are true, then it\u2019s not out of bounds for Presbyterian individuals and churches who are at odds with the PCUSA\u2019s affirmations and practices to consider leaving the PCUSA. Every option is on the table as far as I\u2019m concerned.<br \/>\nSo, then: <em>Where do we go from here?<\/em><br \/>\nBefore I begin to answer this question, I want to make a couple of preliminary comments. First, I direct your attention to an outstanding discussion of this very question that appears on the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pfrenewal.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Presbyterians for Renewal<\/a><\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pfrenewal.org\/\"> website<\/a>. This newly-revamped website is full of helpful material for Presbyterians. I highly recommend it in general. But, specifically, I want to point you to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pfrenewal.org\/issues\/297-what-way-ahead-in-the-pcusa-part-one-three-options\" target=\"_blank\">Part One of a three-part series entitled: <em>What Way Ahead?<\/em><\/a> It is written by Michael Walker, Theologian-in-Residence at Highland Park Presbyterian Church, and former Executive Director of PFR. Michael\u2019s approach to this issue is outstanding: thoughtful, careful, fair, measured. In fact, I had considered simply copying his piece and putting it up on my site. It\u2019s a must read. (While I\u2019m recommending websites, let me once again draw your attention to <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.presbyweb.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Presbyweb<\/a><\/em>, which is by far the best place to keep up with what\u2019s going on in the PCUSA, as well as in the religious world in general.)<br \/>\nSecond, I want to define \u201cwe\u201d in the question \u201cWhere do we go from here?\u201d For me, \u201cwe\u201d means \u201cmembers of the PCUSA who are deeply concerned about and in disagreement with many of the recent actions of the 2008 General Assembly, including but not limited votes related to gay ordination.\u201d For the most part, \u201cwe\u201d includes evangelical Presbyterians who are committed to the full authority of Scripture. (There are a few in this category who are not opposed to the GA actions, however.) So, I am not asking \u201cWhere should the PCUSA go from here?\u201d as if I were a part of the national denominational leadership. I\u2019m speaking from my own perspective within the denomination.<br \/>\nSo, then: <em>Where do we go from here?<\/em><br \/>\nWherever we go, I believe there\u2019s no need to rush. Or, I might better say, we should not rush. It\u2019s not as if the PCUSA suddenly, as if out of nowhere, voted to ordain gays and lesbians. This issue, and a host of related theological issues, have been with us for a long time. Haste is neither required nor wise because, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pfrenewal.org\/issues\/201-free-to-be-faithful\" target=\"_blank\">Michael Walker explained<\/a> after the 2006 General Assembly, we are still \u201cfree to be faithful.\u201d At this very moment, nobody is telling me I have to affirm something I don\u2019t believe or do something I think is wrong. If this were to happen, I would promptly leave the PCUSA rather than deny my conscience before the Lord. But at this time I am free to believe and act according to my sense of biblical righteousness and truth. (I&#8217;m aware that this time might be coming to an end in the PCUSA, however.)<br \/>\nMoreover, there\u2019s no need to rush because the issues of grave concern are still filled with uncertainty. Yes, the GA voted to change the <em>Book of Order<\/em> to allow for the ordination of gays and lesbians. But this has happened before, and so far the presbyteries have voted to reject such GA votes. It\u2019s quite possible that the presbyteries will do this again in 2009, leaving the <em>Book of Order<\/em> intact. Furthermore, though the intention of the 2008 GA was to install a new \u201cAuthoritative Interpretation\u201d that allows local governing bodies to act contrary to the <em>Book of Order\u2019s<\/em> current prohibition of gay ordination, it\u2019s questionable whether this GA vote was consistent with the PCUSA Constitution. It may well be thrown out by church courts. Therefore, it\u2019s quite possible that, in spite of the actions of the 2008 GA, the PCUSA will not end up approving of the ordinations of active gay and lesbian people. If, at the end of next year, the presbyteries have voted to allow gay ordination and the PCUSA courts have agreed, there will still be strong arguments made by some evangelicals for staying in the denomination, but many will be unconvinced by them, I think.<br \/>\nI should qualify my view that there\u2019s no need to rush, however. I\u2019m aware that some Presbyterian churches find themselves in presbyteries that are both liberal and hostile. I have heard stories about how some evangelical churches have been harassed and hampered by their presbyteries. Such churches are not \u201cfree to be faithful.\u201d Thus, for these churches, it may well be the right time to leave the denomination. Yet, even for these, I would recommend against rushing. A careful, thoughtful, prayerful process is always best, and rarely happens quickly.<br \/>\nAs an aside, I want to note, once again, that the real substance of a denominational connection is not the relationship of members and churches to the national body, but rather the relationship to the local body, which in the case of the PCUSA is the presbytery. The local, tangible, face-to-face relationships are what really matter in practice. Larger denominational connections are mostly irrelevant to most churches most of the time.<br \/>\nYet, even if at the end of 2009 the PCUSA, by votes of presbyteries and church courts, has upheld our longstanding prohibition of gay ordination, it would be na\u00efve to think that we\u2019re back to business as usual. The last GA has revealed just how divided our denomination is, and not just about homosexuality. We differ on many matters of basic theology, including the authority of Scripture, how to interpret Scripture, how to relate to the culture, and even the substance of the good news. Evangelical PCUSA must not put our heads in the sand and assume that we can go on just as we have in the past. Pay attention to these wise words from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pfrenewal.org\/issues\/297-what-way-ahead-in-the-pcusa-part-one-three-options\">Michael Walker<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Though the technical implications of the Assembly\u2019s decisions on sexuality remain unclear, the number and consistent character of those decisions speak with a clear voice. When the misguided statement on interfaith relations is added to the mix, not to mention the embarrassing lack of attention to Christian faith exhibited in the discussions leading up to these decisions, this GA has successfully pulled back the veil, so to speak, enabling us to see more clearly the situation we\u2019ve been facing for quite some time.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And what is this situation? Here&#8217;s how Michael describes it:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> What we experienced at this last GA was an advancement of a trajectory that shows no sign of abating. It\u2019s not about the \u201cliberal groups,\u201d whose true effectiveness is, honestly, unknown. Rather, the actions of the San Jose Assembly reflect the power of western culture generally to shape the ethos of a denomination that does not have a clear sense of its mission <em>to<\/em> the culture. Unchecked and unchallenged, the \u201cdefault\u201d pattern of the PC(USA) will be to continue moving along with the prevailing spirituality of western culture (\u201cmoralistic therapeutic deism,\u201d as it has been dubbed recently), and with its embrace of the culture\u2019s obsession with variant forms of sexual expression.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/..\/..\/images\/rocky-apollo-fight-4.jpg\" align=\"right\" height=\"288\" hspace=\"20\" vspace=\"5\" width=\"288\" \/>I have described certain aspects of this &#8220;default&#8221; pattern in some detail in this series, pointing to the way it has divided our denomination. The PCUSA is profoundly divided on many things, centrally the issue of gay ordination. These divisions mean that we simply can\u2019t get along peacefully as a denomination, not to mention engage in common mission. We can stay together institutionally. But we will continue to fight over many things, not only the ordination issues. We will use our dwindling resources as a denomination in internal squabbles, proving that Jesus was right all along when he said that a \u201chouse divided against itself will not stand\u201d (Matt 12:25). If the PCUSA stays together with the same structures that are currently in place, we will look like a boxing match between Rocky Balboa and Apollo Creed. One boxer might end up winning the match, but both boxers will pummel each other nearly to death. That might make for good drama in a film, but it cripples the mission of the PCUSA churches, and therefore of the PCUSA as a whole.<br \/>\nI believe that the health and mission of the churches of the PCUSA require us to rethink the nature of our relationship so that we might alter that relationship in a way that is theologically-sound, practically-wise, and, perhaps, even God-honoring. If this is going to happen, several things are needed. I\u2019ll spell these out in my next post in this series.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Part 14 of series: The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited Permalink for this post \/ Permalink for this series So far in this series on The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited I have argued that we members of the PCUSA cannot get along as a unified denomination because of our deep&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":214,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pcusa-end-of"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Where Do We Go From Here? Section 1 - Mark D. Roberts<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Where Do We Go From Here? Section 1 - Mark D. Roberts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Part 14 of series: The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited Permalink for this post \/ Permalink for this series So far in this series on The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited I have argued that we members of the PCUSA cannot get along as a unified denomination because of our deep&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mark D. Roberts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-25T01:01:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mark D. Roberts\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Where Do We Go From Here? Section 1 - Mark D. Roberts","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Where Do We Go From Here? Section 1 - Mark D. Roberts","og_description":"Part 14 of series: The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited Permalink for this post \/ Permalink for this series So far in this series on The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited I have argued that we members of the PCUSA cannot get along as a unified denomination because of our deep&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html","og_site_name":"Mark D. Roberts","article_published_time":"2008-08-25T01:01:02+00:00","author":"Mark D. Roberts","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html","name":"Where Do We Go From Here? Section 1 - Mark D. Roberts","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-25T01:01:02+00:00","dateModified":"2008-08-25T01:01:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#\/schema\/person\/1ff094a57b7e41f534434b1723df3d73"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/08\/where-do-we-go-from-here-section-1.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Where Do We Go From Here? Section 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/","name":"Mark D. Roberts","description":"Mark D. Roberts: Thoughtfully Christian Reflections on Jesus, the Church, and the World","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#\/schema\/person\/1ff094a57b7e41f534434b1723df3d73","name":"Mark D. Roberts","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/f2d\/f2ddf5f080861f66ea230384f9d1bab2x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/f2d\/f2ddf5f080861f66ea230384f9d1bab2x96.jpg","caption":"Mark D. Roberts"},"description":"The Rev. Dr. Mark D. Roberts is a pastor, author, retreat leader, speaker, and blogger. Since October 2007 he has been the Senior Director and Scholar-in-Residence for Laity Lodge, a multifaceted ministry in the Hill Country of Texas. Before coming to Laity Lodge, he was for sixteen years the Senior Pastor of Irvine Presbyterian Church in Irvine, California (a city in Orange County about forty miles south of Los Angeles). Before his time at Irvine Pres, Mark served on the staff of the First Presbyterian Church of Hollywood as Associate Pastor of Education. (Thanks to Janel Pahl for taking the photo to the right.) Mark studied at Harvard University, receiving a B.A. in Philosophy, an M.A. in the Study of Religion, and a Ph.D. in New Testament and Christian Origins. He has taught classes in New Testament for Fuller Theological Seminary and San Francisco Theological Seminary. Mark has written several books, including No Holds Barred: Wrestling with God in Prayer (WaterBrook, 2005), Dare to Be True (WaterBrook, 2003), Jesus Revealed (WaterBrook, 2002), After \"I Believe\" (Baker, 2002), and Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther (Word, 1993). His most recent book is Can We Trust the Gospels? Investigating the Reliability of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John (Crossway, 2007). He is currently working on a commentary on Ephesians that will be published by Zondervan in 2014. Mark writes a devotional for The High Calling of Our Daily Work, a website associated with Laity Lodge. His \"Daily Reflections\" can be viewed online or sent as a daily email. If you wish to receive this email, just visit TheHighCalling.org and sign up. Mark serves on the editorial board of Worship Leader magazine, where he publishes articles and reviews, including his regular column \"Lyrical Poetry.\" Additionally, he has published dozens of articles in leading magazines and journals. He often speaks for churches and other Christian groups, and has been interviewed on over seventy-five radio programs nationwide. Mark is married to Linda, who is a Marriage and Family Therapist, a Spiritual Director, and a retreat speaker. They have two children, Nathan and Kara.For Publicity Photos and Bio Statements for Mark, please check here. Mark's Dossier Professional History: Senior Director and Scholar-in Residence, Laity Lodge, October 2007 to present. Senior Pastor Irvine Presbyterian Church, June 1991 to September 2007 Adjunct Assistant Professor Fuller Theological Seminary, 1994 to 2007. Courses: New Testament Theology and Exegesis. Adjunct Instructor San Francisco Theological Seminary, 1995 to 2001. Courses: New Testament Greek and Exegesis Associate Pastor of Education First Presbyterian Church of Hollywood, 1987-1991 Teaching Fellow Harvard University, 1980-1983 Education: Ph.D. in the Study of Religion. Harvard University, 1992. Area: New Testament and Christian Origins M.A. in the Study of Religion Harvard University, 1984. A.B. magna cum laude in Philosophy Harvard University, 1979. Phi Beta Kappa; Danforth Fellowship Books: Can We Trust the Gospels? Investigating the Reliability of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Crossway, 2007 No Holds Barred: Wrestling with God in Prayer. WaterBrook, 2005 Dare to Be True: Living in the Freedom of Complete Honesty. WaterBrook, 2003. Jesus Revealed: Know Him Better to Love Him Better. WaterBrook, 2002. After \"I Believe\": Experiencing Authentic Christian Living. Baker, 2002. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther in the Communicator's Commentary Series. Word, 1993. Contacting Mark: You can reach Mark at: E-mail: mark@markdroberts.com mroberts@laitylodge.org Phone: Laity Lodge: (830) 792-1216 Address: Laity Lodge 719 Earl Garrett Kerrville, TX 78028","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/author\/mroberts"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/214"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=518"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/518\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}