{"id":482,"date":"2008-07-08T01:01:54","date_gmt":"2008-07-08T01:01:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html"},"modified":"2008-07-08T01:01:54","modified_gmt":"2008-07-08T01:01:54","slug":"the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html","title":{"rendered":"The End of the PCUSA? Revisited"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"right\">Part 1 of series: <em>The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited<br \/>\n<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.markdroberts.com\/htmfiles\/resources\/endofpcusa2008.htm#jul808\" target=\"_blank\">Permalink for this post<\/a> \/ <a href=\"http:\/\/www.markdroberts.com\/htmfiles\/resources\/endofpcusa2008.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Permalink for this series<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Two years ago I wrote a blog series in which I asked: Has the Presbyterian Church USA (my own denomination) come to an end? My answer was: &#8220;Well, maybe. It doesn&#8217;t look good.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Today I want to begin to revisit the question of whether the PCUSA is in its own end times, so to speak. Let me explain why I&#8217;m raising this tired topic yet again.<br \/>\n<strong>2006: The End of the PCUSA?<\/strong><br \/>\nIn 2006, following the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church USA, I wrote a blog series entitled <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.markdroberts.com\/htmfiles\/resources\/endofpcusa.htm\" target=\"_blank\">The End of the Presbyterian Church USA<\/a>?<\/em> In that series, I described recent actions of that General Assembly with respect to the issue that Presbyterians have debated for over thirty years . . . human sexuality. That Assembly reaffirmed the section of the <em>Book of Order<\/em> (the PCUSA guidebook for the church) that requires candidates for ordination to practice &#8220;fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman or chastity in singleness&#8221; (G-6.0106b). But then, in a move that perplexed and distressed many Presbyterians, including me, the Assembly approved a report (the so-called PUP Report, for &#8220;Peace, Unity, and Purity&#8221;), that allowed the governing bodies that ordain church officers to decide for themselves whether a candidate for ordination needed to obey the stated rule or not. No longer would a candidate be required, according to this new guidance, to practice fidelity in marriage or chastity in singleness. Any governing body was free to determine its own conclusion in the matter, thus opening up the door to the ordination of people who were sexually active outside of marriage, whether in straight or gay relationships.<br \/>\nIn my 2006 blog series, I spoke of how the action of the Assembly broke trust with those of us who have been committed to the PCUSA. I considered whether or not this was adequate reason to leave the PCUSA, given biblical teaching on the nature of Christian community. My conclusion was tentative. I was not prepared to leave the PCUSA, but was not ruling out the possibility. It did seem to me that the actions of the 2006 General Assembly hastened the end of the PCUSA as we knew it.<br \/>\n<strong>Today: The End of the PCUSA? Revisited<\/strong><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/..\/..\/images\/san-jose-california-5.jpg\" align=\"right\" height=\"270\" hspace=\"15\" vspace=\"5\" width=\"360\" \/>The 2008 General Assembly, held in San Jose, California, recently wrapped up. Much of what happened at the Assembly and many of the votes taken were find and dandy. But several actions of the 2008 Assembly make what happened in 2006 look like the minor leagues. We PCUSA types are now in the big leagues of church crises. (Photo: San Jose, California)<br \/>\nThis would be true even if the General Assembly had done nothing controversial, by the way. Shortly before the Assembly convened, the denomination released its statistics for 2007. Overall, the PCUSA lost 57,572 members, or 2.6% of its total membership. At this rate, the membership of the PCUSA will hit zero in less than forty years. I suppose the issue of gay ordination will be finally and definitively settled by the last person standing in 2046.<br \/>\nBut I doubt the PCUSA will make it to 2046 intact. What happened in the last General Assembly has caused an unprecedented crisis in the denomination. I knew we were in trouble when, during my recent trip to San Jose to speak at a breakfast associated with the Assembly, I ran into a good friend who has been for many years one of the most enthusiastic supporters of the PCUSA, even though he has solid evangelical credentials. Even before the Assembly convened, my friend was deeply concerned. He spoke more negatively about the denomination than I had ever heard before. Something monumentally bad was about to happen, or so it seemed as I listened to him.<br \/>\nIn the aftermath of the General Assembly, the comments of dyed-in-the-wool Presbyterians confirmed my friend&#8217;s prediction of doom and gloom. Here is an assortment of comments by biblically-committed and highly-respected leaders in the PCUSA:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The actions of the 218th General Assembly have made it clear that the PC(USA)&#8217;s compromise of the Gospel of Jesus Christ has reached an unprecedented level. It is clear that the PC(USA)&#8217;s confession of the Lordship of Jesus Christ and commitment to our Reformed confessions has weakened to the point that we can no longer assume a common framework of conversation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ga2008.com\/docs\/Reshaping_the_PC(USA).pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Presbyterians for Renewal<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>I am shocked and dismayed. . . . [T]he General Assembly of the PCUSA has taken a number of actions which are at odds with Scripture and threaten to unravel any vestige of purity, peace, and unity that may still exist within the denomination. . . . [T]he PCUSA is clearly on a path of self-destruction in cutting herself off from the larger, global church. These actions are the product of bad theology. Bad theology always hurts people. The word \u201cheresy\u201d means \u201cto  choose.\u201d With the actions of this General Assembly, the PCUSA has chosen to walk a different path than the path God has revealed to the Church in His Word.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hppc.org\/files\/08-06-30_hppc-responds.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Ronald W. Scates<\/a>, pastor of Highland Park Presbyterian Church, one of the largest and most influential churches in the PCUSA<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>With the most recent General Assembly in San Jose, the smoke seems at last to have cleared, and the steaming debris of the PC(USA) has settled into place. ?It\u2019s not a pretty sight. One thing for sure: this Humpty won\u2019t be getting back together again for a long time, if ever.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/pgf.typepad.com\/outbox\/2008\/07\/do-you-know-the.html#more\" target=\"_blank\">Vic Pentz<\/a>, pastor of Peachtree Presbyterian Church, the largest church in the PCUSA<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Today the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) lies gravely wounded, by the hand of its own General Assembly. This Assembly has struck multiple blows, threatening to sever the sinews that hold us together as a Christian body and as a part of the larger body of Christ. This is a day for grieving. . . . We grieve for the Assembly&#8217;s terrible loss of faith. We grieve for the thousands of churches in our denomination who receive this news with shock and dismay. And we grieve for all those who are encouraged by this action to engage in sinful behaviors that God does not bless.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/pforum.org\/media2.php?id=12&amp;t=1\" target=\"_blank\">Presbyterian Renewal Network<\/a>, a group of biblically-committed PCUSA organizations<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Of course not all Presbyterians were upset by the actions of the Assembly. Consider, for example, the following comments:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This is an amazing moment in history.  I give thanks to God for all of you who have been praying, believing and working for the Presbyterian Church (USA) to end discrimination against its own lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender daughters and sons, sisters and brothers in Christ. . . . There is clearly a sea-change in our Church, society and world as more people are letting go of the old beliefs and prejudice about homosexuality, same-gender loving persons and embracing what it means to recognize Christ and the divine image within all of God children. . . . For this moment, on this day, we rejoice in the fact that this Assembly has provided a way forward for our beloved Church.  Together we are building a Church for all God&#8217;s people!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mlp.org\/article.php?story=20080627141501803\" target=\"_blank\">Michael Adee<\/a>, Executive Director of More Light Presbyterians<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>We give thanks for the decision of the 218th General Assembly to send to the presbyteries a thoughtful revision of the standards for ordination. The Authoritative Interpretation that was also approved immediately removes the specific references that have proved most hurtful to GLBT persons who are otherwise called and prepared to serve the church. This is a day that has been thirty years in coming and we give thanks for the hope that it offers to so many in the church who have been and still are excluded from ordained office. . . .<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.presbyweb.com\/2008\/News\/0628-CovenantNetwork-ResponseOrdinationStandards.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Leaders of the Covenant Network<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>With gratitude to God, the board, staff, and community of That All May Freely Serve rejoice in the vote by the 218th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) to open the door to the gifts and callings of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer members by removing its institutional barriers to ordination.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tamfs.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">That All My Freely Serve<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>What an astounding diversity of responses to the General Assembly actions! If nothing else, these various statements illustrate the extraordinary lack of visionary and theological unity in the PCUSA. What some people folks see as heresy and tragedy, others receive as liberation and hope. What some see as cause for grief and repentance, others experience as a reason for thanks and celebration. It&#8217;s hard to imagine a Christian group less unified than the PCUSA at this time. We&#8217;re pretty much tied with the Anglicans, as far as I can tell.<br \/>\nIf you haven&#8217;t been following this story closely, you may wonder what the General Assembly did to elicit such passionate and contradictory responses from its leaders. I&#8217;ll explain the Assembly&#8217;s actions in my next post.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Part 1 of series: The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited Permalink for this post \/ Permalink for this series Two years ago I wrote a blog series in which I asked: Has the Presbyterian Church USA (my own denomination) come to an end? My answer was: &#8220;Well, maybe. It doesn&#8217;t look good.&#8221; Today&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":214,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pcusa-end-of"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The End of the PCUSA? Revisited - Mark D. Roberts<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The End of the PCUSA? Revisited - Mark D. Roberts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Part 1 of series: The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited Permalink for this post \/ Permalink for this series Two years ago I wrote a blog series in which I asked: Has the Presbyterian Church USA (my own denomination) come to an end? My answer was: &#8220;Well, maybe. It doesn&#8217;t look good.&#8221; Today&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mark D. Roberts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-08T01:01:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mark D. Roberts\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The End of the PCUSA? Revisited - Mark D. Roberts","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The End of the PCUSA? Revisited - Mark D. Roberts","og_description":"Part 1 of series: The End of the Presbyterian Church USA? Revisited Permalink for this post \/ Permalink for this series Two years ago I wrote a blog series in which I asked: Has the Presbyterian Church USA (my own denomination) come to an end? My answer was: &#8220;Well, maybe. It doesn&#8217;t look good.&#8221; Today&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html","og_site_name":"Mark D. Roberts","article_published_time":"2008-07-08T01:01:54+00:00","author":"Mark D. Roberts","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html","name":"The End of the PCUSA? Revisited - Mark D. Roberts","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-08T01:01:54+00:00","dateModified":"2008-07-08T01:01:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#\/schema\/person\/1ff094a57b7e41f534434b1723df3d73"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/2008\/07\/the-end-of-the-pcusa-revisited.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The End of the PCUSA? Revisited"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/","name":"Mark D. Roberts","description":"Mark D. Roberts: Thoughtfully Christian Reflections on Jesus, the Church, and the World","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#\/schema\/person\/1ff094a57b7e41f534434b1723df3d73","name":"Mark D. Roberts","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/f2d\/f2ddf5f080861f66ea230384f9d1bab2x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/f2d\/f2ddf5f080861f66ea230384f9d1bab2x96.jpg","caption":"Mark D. Roberts"},"description":"The Rev. Dr. Mark D. Roberts is a pastor, author, retreat leader, speaker, and blogger. Since October 2007 he has been the Senior Director and Scholar-in-Residence for Laity Lodge, a multifaceted ministry in the Hill Country of Texas. Before coming to Laity Lodge, he was for sixteen years the Senior Pastor of Irvine Presbyterian Church in Irvine, California (a city in Orange County about forty miles south of Los Angeles). Before his time at Irvine Pres, Mark served on the staff of the First Presbyterian Church of Hollywood as Associate Pastor of Education. (Thanks to Janel Pahl for taking the photo to the right.) Mark studied at Harvard University, receiving a B.A. in Philosophy, an M.A. in the Study of Religion, and a Ph.D. in New Testament and Christian Origins. He has taught classes in New Testament for Fuller Theological Seminary and San Francisco Theological Seminary. Mark has written several books, including No Holds Barred: Wrestling with God in Prayer (WaterBrook, 2005), Dare to Be True (WaterBrook, 2003), Jesus Revealed (WaterBrook, 2002), After \"I Believe\" (Baker, 2002), and Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther (Word, 1993). His most recent book is Can We Trust the Gospels? Investigating the Reliability of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John (Crossway, 2007). He is currently working on a commentary on Ephesians that will be published by Zondervan in 2014. Mark writes a devotional for The High Calling of Our Daily Work, a website associated with Laity Lodge. His \"Daily Reflections\" can be viewed online or sent as a daily email. If you wish to receive this email, just visit TheHighCalling.org and sign up. Mark serves on the editorial board of Worship Leader magazine, where he publishes articles and reviews, including his regular column \"Lyrical Poetry.\" Additionally, he has published dozens of articles in leading magazines and journals. He often speaks for churches and other Christian groups, and has been interviewed on over seventy-five radio programs nationwide. Mark is married to Linda, who is a Marriage and Family Therapist, a Spiritual Director, and a retreat speaker. They have two children, Nathan and Kara.For Publicity Photos and Bio Statements for Mark, please check here. Mark's Dossier Professional History: Senior Director and Scholar-in Residence, Laity Lodge, October 2007 to present. Senior Pastor Irvine Presbyterian Church, June 1991 to September 2007 Adjunct Assistant Professor Fuller Theological Seminary, 1994 to 2007. Courses: New Testament Theology and Exegesis. Adjunct Instructor San Francisco Theological Seminary, 1995 to 2001. Courses: New Testament Greek and Exegesis Associate Pastor of Education First Presbyterian Church of Hollywood, 1987-1991 Teaching Fellow Harvard University, 1980-1983 Education: Ph.D. in the Study of Religion. Harvard University, 1992. Area: New Testament and Christian Origins M.A. in the Study of Religion Harvard University, 1984. A.B. magna cum laude in Philosophy Harvard University, 1979. Phi Beta Kappa; Danforth Fellowship Books: Can We Trust the Gospels? Investigating the Reliability of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Crossway, 2007 No Holds Barred: Wrestling with God in Prayer. WaterBrook, 2005 Dare to Be True: Living in the Freedom of Complete Honesty. WaterBrook, 2003. Jesus Revealed: Know Him Better to Love Him Better. WaterBrook, 2002. After \"I Believe\": Experiencing Authentic Christian Living. Baker, 2002. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther in the Communicator's Commentary Series. Word, 1993. Contacting Mark: You can reach Mark at: E-mail: mark@markdroberts.com mroberts@laitylodge.org Phone: Laity Lodge: (830) 792-1216 Address: Laity Lodge 719 Earl Garrett Kerrville, TX 78028","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/author\/mroberts"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/214"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=482"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/482\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/markdroberts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}