{"id":314,"date":"2010-11-05T11:46:49","date_gmt":"2010-11-05T11:46:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html"},"modified":"2010-11-05T11:46:49","modified_gmt":"2010-11-05T11:46:49","slug":"president-obama-does-he-get-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html","title":{"rendered":"President Obama: Does He Get It?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>Barry,<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>I would not use that label to identify the President.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>I will say, however, that President Obama continues to embrace and promote pro-abortion policies that many Americans strongly disagree with. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>Take the outcome of the election &#8211; an unmistakable repudiation of the President&#8217;s policies. As columnist <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/11\/03\/AR2010110307459.html\">George Will<\/a> <\/span><span>put it, &#8220;This election was a nationwide recoil against Barack Obama&#8217;s idea of unlimited government.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>He&#8217;s right.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>And, voters also sent another message: they don&#8217;t want the President&#8217;s pro-abortion, government-run health care law.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>It&#8217;s clear that most Americans who went to the polls oppose ObamaCare and want it repealed.<span>&nbsp; <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.rasmussenreports.com\/public_content\/politics\/general_politics\/november_2010\/voters_strongly_anticipate_health_care_repeal_in_the_house\">Exit polling <\/a>found that 59% of those who voted on election day favor repealing the law &#8211; numbers that have been consistent since the troubling health care measure was passed in March.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>As the tidal wave moved across the nation election night, many Democrats who ran in House races found out first-hand that ObamaCare is not only unpopular, it is toxic. <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/healthwatch\/politics-elections\/127261-few-democrats-survive-vote-in-favor-of-health-reform\">The Hill <\/a>reported&nbsp;that, in many cases, a vote for ObamaCare translated into a defeat.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>At the same time, <a href=\"http:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2010\/11\/04\/new-wave-of-house-republicans-includes-several-health-care-professionals-who-ran-against-obamacare\/\">candidates<\/a> who ran against ObamaCare &#8211; including&nbsp;those who work <\/span><span>in the medical field &#8211; were elected.<span>&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>I know you don&#8217;t believe that ObamaCare clears the way for taxpayer funds to be used for abortions.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>We&#8217;ve had this <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/03\/from-congress-to-the-courts.html\">discussion<\/a> before.&nbsp;<span> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>The fact is that ObamaCare quite possibly represents the largest expansion of federally-subsidized abortion in history.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>Under Title I, Subtitle D, Section 1303, as amended by Title X, Subtitle A, Section 10104, this law allows federal subsidies for Qualified Health Plans that cover abortion.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>In an attempt to disguise this fact, the same section also establishes a gimmicky accounting requirement that directs these subsidies be applied to a non-abortion portion of the premium. This, of course, does nothing to change the fact that the federally subsidized plan is still covering abortion. It is also directly contrary to the way abortion funding is treated under other federal programs governed by the Hyde Amendment. In those cases, subsidies for plans that cover abortion are strictly prohibited.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>I don&#8217;t expect to change your mind on that. The pro-abortion language in the law is only part of the problem, though. There are serious constitutional concerns as well.<\/span><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>We&#8217;ve filed a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aclj.org\/media\/pdf\/HC-DCT-Complaint_20100609.pdf\">federal lawsuit <\/a>in Washington, D.C. challenging the individual mandate provision &#8211; a violation of the Commerce Clause.<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;T<\/span>he complaint argues:&nbsp; &#8220;Mandating that individuals purchase health insurance is an unprecedented and unconstitutional expansion of congressional power, as Congress has never before required individuals to involuntarily buy a good or service under the guise of its Commerce Clause authority.&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>We&#8217;ve also filed an amicus brief&nbsp;supporting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/10\/18\/AR2010101805193.html?wprss=rss_metro\/va\">Virginia&#8217;s legal challenge <\/a>on behalf of 28 members of Congress and more than 70,000 Americans in support Virginia&#8217;s challenge.&nbsp;&nbsp; A federal judge recently heard arguments in that case&nbsp; and a decision is expected by the end of the year.<\/p>\n<p>Barry, whether it&#8217;s through litigation or legislation &#8211; the fact is that ObamaCare is in big trouble.&nbsp; No one denies that there&#8217;s a critical need for health care reform. But <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lifenews.com\/2010\/11\/03\/nat-6821\/\">most&nbsp;Americans <\/a>&#8211; including Christian conservatives &#8211; don&#8217;t want this law. ObamaCare is not the reform that America needs or deserves.<span>&nbsp; <\/span><\/p>\n<p>While jobs and improving the economy are front-and-center, Republican leaders also understand that a top priority is getting rid of ObamaCare. Soon-to-be House Speaker <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/idUSTRE6A25DB20101103?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=politicsNews&amp;rpc=22&amp;sp=true\">John Boehner (R-OH) <\/a>put it&nbsp;<\/span><span>into perspective:&nbsp; &#8220;I believe that the health care bill that was enacted by the current Congress will kill jobs in America, ruin the best health care system in the world, and bankrupt our country,&#8221; said Boehner. &#8220;That means we have to do everything we can to try to repeal this bill and replace it with common sense reforms to bring down the cost of health care.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>There&#8217;s plenty of evidence to suggest Boehner is correct.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>The Obama Administration quietly <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/yblog_upshot\/20101008\/hl_yblog_upshot\/critics-bash-obama-health-care-exemptions\">exempted<\/a> 30 of the nation&#8217;s biggest companies from ObamaCare &#8211; giving them a pass &#8211; because they couldn&#8217;t afford it.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>The biggest beneficiary of the exemptions:<span>&nbsp; <\/span>New York&#8217;s teachers union which campaigned for Obama in 2008 and backed his health care plan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>And, now, <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20101104\/ap_on_bi_ge\/us_aarp_health_plan_2\">AARP<\/a>, which helped secure passage of ObamaCare with its endorsement, is telling its members&nbsp;<\/span><span>to expect hikes in health care premiums because of this law.<span>&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748703805704575594280015549088.html?mod=rss_opinion_main\">Boehner<\/a> also understands that a majority of the American people not only oppose the health care law, they rejected the way it was done &#8211; the way it was forced on Americans.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>He&#8217;s calling&nbsp;for an end to &#8220;secrecy, arrogance, and the abuse of power&#8221; that dominated the health care process in the House.<span>&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>Sure, there are critics who say the legislation to repeal ObamaCare won&#8217;t clear the Senate and, if it somehow does, will be vetoed by the President.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>Maybe so, but there are other ways to get rid of this flawed law.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>Senate Minority Leader <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2010-11-04\/republican-mcconnell-calls-for-votes-to-repeal-new-health-care-overhaul.html\">Mitch McConnell (R-KY )<\/a>&nbsp;said <\/span><span>he&#8217;s prepared to take action to defund ObamaCare.<span>&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>The American people sent a message to President Obama. They want change &#8211; and they want ObamaCare repealed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>Perhaps, the only person who is not listening to the American people may be the President himself.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>He said he&#8217;s ready &#8220;to listen&#8221; to Republicans and their ideas and has said he is open to only &#8220;tweaking&#8221; the health care law.<span>&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>In the aftermath of one of the biggest political shifts in the House in decades &#8211; and in the face of strong opposition to ObamaCare from the American people, <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20101103\/ap_on_el_ge\/us_election_rdp_95\">the President <\/a>still proudly proclaimed&nbsp;that passing the flawed health care legislation was &#8220;the right thing to do.&#8221;<span>&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>As one<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2010\/nov\/3\/an-oblivious-president\/\"> editorial <\/a>concluded, &#8220;President Obama still doesn&#8217;t get it.&#8221;&nbsp; <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>Let&#8217;s hope he does.<span>&nbsp; <\/span>There&#8217;s too much at stake.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span><span><span><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><span><span><span><font color=\"#000000\"><span><font size=\"3\"><span><font size=\"3\"><font face=\"Times New Roman\"><span><span><span><font size=\"3\"><font face=\"Times New Roman\"><span><span><font size=\"5\" face=\"Times New Roman\">To subscribe to &#8220;Lynn v. Sekulow&#8221; click <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/www.feedburner.com\/fb\/a\/emailverifySubmit?feedId=2290560\"><font size=\"5\" face=\"Times New Roman\">here<\/font><\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/font><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/font><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Barry, &nbsp; I would not use that label to identify the President.&nbsp; I will say, however, that President Obama continues to embrace and promote pro-abortion policies that many Americans strongly disagree with. &nbsp; Take the outcome of the election &#8211; an unmistakable repudiation of the President&#8217;s policies. As columnist George Will put it, &#8220;This election&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":163,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,320,217,123],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-314","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abortion","category-elections","category-health-care","category-president-barack-obama"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>President Obama: Does He Get It? - Lynn v. Sekulow<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"President Obama: Does He Get It? - Lynn v. Sekulow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Barry, &nbsp; I would not use that label to identify the President.&nbsp; I will say, however, that President Obama continues to embrace and promote pro-abortion policies that many Americans strongly disagree with. &nbsp; Take the outcome of the election &#8211; an unmistakable repudiation of the President&#8217;s policies. As columnist George Will put it, &#8220;This election&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lynn v. Sekulow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-05T11:46:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jay Sekulow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"President Obama: Does He Get It? - Lynn v. Sekulow","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"President Obama: Does He Get It? - Lynn v. Sekulow","og_description":"Barry, &nbsp; I would not use that label to identify the President.&nbsp; I will say, however, that President Obama continues to embrace and promote pro-abortion policies that many Americans strongly disagree with. &nbsp; Take the outcome of the election &#8211; an unmistakable repudiation of the President&#8217;s policies. As columnist George Will put it, &#8220;This election&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html","og_site_name":"Lynn v. Sekulow","article_published_time":"2010-11-05T11:46:49+00:00","author":"Jay Sekulow","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html","name":"President Obama: Does He Get It? - Lynn v. Sekulow","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-05T11:46:49+00:00","dateModified":"2010-11-05T11:46:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#\/schema\/person\/d09bc4c4bba2ac87034ee529f100fbaf"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2010\/11\/president-obama-does-he-get-it.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"President Obama: Does He Get It?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/","name":"Lynn v. Sekulow","description":"A debate blog about church, state, faith and politics with Jay Sekulow and Barry W. Lynn","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#\/schema\/person\/d09bc4c4bba2ac87034ee529f100fbaf","name":"Jay Sekulow","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/574\/574bc7f1605fea9a78a1b3bac65ceb15x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/574\/574bc7f1605fea9a78a1b3bac65ceb15x96.jpg","caption":"Jay Sekulow"},"description":"Jay Alan Sekulow is Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization that focuses on constitutional law.&nbsp; He is also Chief Counsel of the European Center for Law and Justice (ECLJ). Jay Sekulow has also served as a faculty member for the Office of Legal Education at the United States Department of Justice.&nbsp; As a member of the faculty he instructed Assistant United States Attorneys and investigators in the First Amendment issues associated with prosecution of obscenity. An accomplished and respected judicial advocate, Sekulow has presented oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in numerous cases in defense of constitutional freedoms. Several landmark cases argued by Sekulow before the U.S. Supreme Court have become part of the legal landscape in the area of religious liberty litigation.&nbsp; In the Mergens case, Sekulow cleared the way for public school students to form Bible clubs and religious organizations on their school campuses.&nbsp; In the Lamb's Chapel case, Sekulow defended the free speech rights of religious groups, ensuring that they be treated equally with respect to the use of public facilities.&nbsp; And, most recently, in McConnell v. FEC, Sekulow ensured that the constitutional rights of young people remain protected with a unanimous decision by the high court guaranteeing that minors can participate in political campaigns. A nationally recognized and respected defender of religious freedom, Sekulow has assembled one of the most prestigious law firms in the nation.&nbsp; Founded in 1990, the American Center for Law and Justice focuses in constitutional law.&nbsp; The ACLJ, under Sekulow's direction, is involved in public interest and public policy issues working to protect religious and constitutional liberties. In 2007, the Chicago Tribune concluded that the ACLJ has \"led the way\" in Christian legal advocacy.&nbsp; In 2005, TIME Magazine named Sekulow one of the \"25 Most Influential Evangelicals\" in America and called the ACLJ \"a powerful counterweight\" to the ACLU.&nbsp; Business Week said the ACLJ is \"the leading advocacy group for religious freedom.\"&nbsp; Sekulow's work on the issue of judicial nominees - including possible vacancies at the Supreme Court - has received extensive news coverage including a front page story in The Wall Street Journal.&nbsp; In addition, The National Law Journal has twice named Sekulow one of the \"100 Most Influential Lawyers\" in the United States (1994, 1997).&nbsp; He is also among a distinguished group of attorneys known as \"The Public Sector 45\" named by The American Lawyer (January\/February 1997).&nbsp; The magazine said the designation represents \"45 young lawyers outside the private sector whose vision and commitment are changing lives.\" Sekulow brings insight and education to listeners daily with his national call-in radio program, Jay Sekulow Live!, which is broadcast throughout the country on nearly 850 radio stations.&nbsp; Sekulow also hosts a weekly television program, ACLJ This Week, which tackles the tough issues of the day and is broadcast on a number of networks nationwide including the Trinity Broadcasting Network and FamilyNet.&nbsp; Sekulow is also a popular guest on nationally televised news programs on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX News, MSNBC, CNBC, and PBS.&nbsp; He frequently contributes articles and commentary to national publications and is often quoted in the nation's leading newspapers including USA Today, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, and Washington Times. A graduate of Mercer University, Sekulow graduated cum laude receiving both a bachelor's degree and doctor of jurisprudence from Mercer University where he served on the Mercer Law Review as an editorial staff member.&nbsp; Following graduation, Sekulow served as a tax trial attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service.&nbsp; In that capacity, Sekulow prepared and brought to trial tax cases on behalf of the United States Department of Treasury in United States Tax Court. He also received a Ph.D. from Regent University, with a dissertation on American Legal History, and is the author of numerous publications and law articles. Sekulow serves as a member of the Board of Trustees for The Supreme Court Historical Society in Washington, DC.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/author\/jsekulow"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/163"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=314"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=314"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}