{"id":227,"date":"2009-09-25T12:33:43","date_gmt":"2009-09-25T12:33:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html"},"modified":"2009-09-25T12:33:43","modified_gmt":"2009-09-25T12:33:43","slug":"keep-the-commandments-constitu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html","title":{"rendered":"Keep the Commandments Constitutional"},"content":{"rendered":"

Barry, I want to offer my congratulations to you and your family.  <\/span>I’m sure your son’s wedding was, indeed, a great celebration.<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I want to take a moment to discuss a topic you and I have debated from time to time – the constitutional role of displaying the Ten Commandments.   <\/span>As you know, ABC News<\/a><\/font> <\/a>is focusing on the Ten Commandments – an issue that always seems to be in the legal spotlight thanks to you and your colleagues.  <\/span>Case in point:  <\/span>Ohio – where we represent Judge James DeWeese of Richland County, Ohio who has been sued repeatedly by the ACLU – this time for a poster he placed in his courtroom called “Philosophies of Law in Conflict.”<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The poster<\/a> <\/font>is divided into two sections.  <\/span>The first is titled “Moral Absolutes,” the second “Moral Relatives.”  <\/span>To illustrate the meaning of these two clashing moral concepts, Judge DeWeese quotes texts which support each one: for moral absolutes, the Ten Commandments; for moral relativism, the Humanist Manifestos and other sources. <\/font><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/font> <\/p>\n

According to its flawed understanding of the Establishment Clause, the ACLU believes that the Ten Commandments are inherently suspect as a constitutional matter and can seldom, if ever, be displayed in the public square.  <\/span>Even in the case of an educational display, such as Judge DeWeese’s, the ACLU believes that the Decalogue is nothing more than a religious text propounding nothing more than religious doctrine.<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

The ACLU is wrong.  <\/span>In numerous Ten Commandments cases that we have handled, federal courts have repeatedly held that the Decalogue has played a profound historical role in the development of Western legal thought.  <\/span>In the 2005 Supreme Court case, Van Orden v. Perry,<\/i> Chief Justice Rehnquist observed that the Ten Commandments “have an undeniable historical meaning” and have played a role in our nation’s heritage.  <\/span>Even Justice Souter, an advocate of strict church and state separation, has noted that “civil or secular law” has been influenced by the Decalogue. <\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

To deny that the Ten Commandments have a secular and historical meaning, in addition to a religious one, is to deny reality and ignore history.<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

The reason Judge DeWeese displays the poster in his courtroom, a poster he designed himself, is set forth on the face of the poster.  <\/span>He wishes to educate visitors to his courtroom that “there is a conflict of legal and moral philosophies raging in the United States,” and that in this conflict between “moral relativism and moral absolutism,” we are moving to a relativist understanding of morality and law.<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

Judge DeWeese, who has been repeatedly re-elected to this position for over eighteen years and has presided over 5,000 felony criminal cases, also states his belief that the moral order has its ultimate source in the divine order.  <\/span>As Judge DeWeese writes:<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

“The Founders were right about the necessity of moral absolutes to the survival and prosperity of our country. I join them and the Constitution of Ohio in acknowledging Almighty God as the author of the necessary standards for restoring the moral fabric, safety and prosperity of this nation.”  <\/span><\/font><\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

Judge DeWeese is quite correct about the Founders’ views regarding morality and religion.<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

In his famous Farewell Address to the newly established nation, George Washington stated that “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.”<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

In a letter to Benjamin Rush, John Adams, the second President of the United States, noted that “Religion and Virtue are the only Foundations, not only of Republicanism and of all free Government, but of social felicity under all Governments and in all Combinations of human society.”<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

Alexander Hamilton, a Founding Father and one of the Federalist Papers’ authors, observed, “Good and wise men, in all ages … have supposed that the deity … has constituted an eternal and immutable law which is indispensably obligatory upon all mankind, prior to any human institutions whatever.”<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

Indeed, as the United States Supreme Court itself has held: “We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being.”<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

The Ohio State Constitution, which the lawsuit contends that the poster violates, in addition to the U.S. Constitution, specifically states that “Religion, morality, and knowledge” are “essential to good government.”<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

This suit is the latest chapter in the ACLU’s legal campaign against Judge DeWeese which now spans eight years.  <\/span>Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to take the initial case and ultimately reverse a decision that found that Judge DeWeese’s display of a copy of the Ten Commandments, alongside a copy of the Bill of Rights, violated the Establishment Clause.  <\/span>The Ten Commandments was removed and replaced with Judge DeWeese’s “Philosophies of Law in Conflict” poster, which is the focus of the current lawsuit.<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n

The federal judge who presided over the first lawsuit against Judge DeWeese rejected a motion last year to hold him in contempt for displaying the current poster, which I reported in a post here in August 2008<\/a>.  <\/font>The judge concluded that “the Court can find no principled basis upon which to find that, or even fully consider whether, the new display is constitutionally impermissible.”<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The importance of this case cannot be underestimated.  <\/span>What is at stake is not just the public display and proper understanding of the Ten Commandments, but the right of public officials to recognize that our nation’s future depends on maintaining those principles on which the nation was founded.  <\/span>A decision by the U.S. District Court could come at any time.<\/font><\/p>\n

<\/font> <\/p>\n

To subscribe to “Lynn v. Sekulow” click <\/font>here<\/font><\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/font><\/font><\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Barry, I want to offer my congratulations to you and your family.  I’m sure your son’s wedding was, indeed, a great celebration.   I want to take a moment to discuss a topic you and I have debated from time to time – the constitutional role of displaying the Ten Commandments.   As you know, ABC…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":163,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[109,2,75,69,254],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-227","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-constitution","category-courts","category-establishment-clause","category-supreme-court","category-ten-commandments"],"yoast_head":"\nKeep the Commandments Constitutional - Lynn v. Sekulow<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Keep the Commandments Constitutional - Lynn v. Sekulow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Barry, I want to offer my congratulations to you and your family.  I’m sure your son’s wedding was, indeed, a great celebration.   I want to take a moment to discuss a topic you and I have debated from time to time – the constitutional role of displaying the Ten Commandments.   As you know, ABC…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lynn v. Sekulow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-25T12:33:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jay Sekulow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Keep the Commandments Constitutional - Lynn v. Sekulow","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Keep the Commandments Constitutional - Lynn v. Sekulow","og_description":"Barry, I want to offer my congratulations to you and your family.  I’m sure your son’s wedding was, indeed, a great celebration.   I want to take a moment to discuss a topic you and I have debated from time to time – the constitutional role of displaying the Ten Commandments.   As you know, ABC…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html","og_site_name":"Lynn v. Sekulow","article_published_time":"2009-09-25T12:33:43+00:00","author":"Jay Sekulow","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html","name":"Keep the Commandments Constitutional - Lynn v. Sekulow","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-25T12:33:43+00:00","dateModified":"2009-09-25T12:33:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#\/schema\/person\/d09bc4c4bba2ac87034ee529f100fbaf"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/2009\/09\/keep-the-commandments-constitu.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Keep the Commandments Constitutional"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/","name":"Lynn v. Sekulow","description":"A debate blog about church, state, faith and politics with Jay Sekulow and Barry W. Lynn","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#\/schema\/person\/d09bc4c4bba2ac87034ee529f100fbaf","name":"Jay Sekulow","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/574\/574bc7f1605fea9a78a1b3bac65ceb15x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/574\/574bc7f1605fea9a78a1b3bac65ceb15x96.jpg","caption":"Jay Sekulow"},"description":"Jay Alan Sekulow is Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization that focuses on constitutional law.  He is also Chief Counsel of the European Center for Law and Justice (ECLJ). Jay Sekulow has also served as a faculty member for the Office of Legal Education at the United States Department of Justice.  As a member of the faculty he instructed Assistant United States Attorneys and investigators in the First Amendment issues associated with prosecution of obscenity. An accomplished and respected judicial advocate, Sekulow has presented oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in numerous cases in defense of constitutional freedoms. Several landmark cases argued by Sekulow before the U.S. Supreme Court have become part of the legal landscape in the area of religious liberty litigation.  In the Mergens case, Sekulow cleared the way for public school students to form Bible clubs and religious organizations on their school campuses.  In the Lamb's Chapel case, Sekulow defended the free speech rights of religious groups, ensuring that they be treated equally with respect to the use of public facilities.  And, most recently, in McConnell v. FEC, Sekulow ensured that the constitutional rights of young people remain protected with a unanimous decision by the high court guaranteeing that minors can participate in political campaigns. A nationally recognized and respected defender of religious freedom, Sekulow has assembled one of the most prestigious law firms in the nation.  Founded in 1990, the American Center for Law and Justice focuses in constitutional law.  The ACLJ, under Sekulow's direction, is involved in public interest and public policy issues working to protect religious and constitutional liberties. In 2007, the Chicago Tribune concluded that the ACLJ has \"led the way\" in Christian legal advocacy.  In 2005, TIME Magazine named Sekulow one of the \"25 Most Influential Evangelicals\" in America and called the ACLJ \"a powerful counterweight\" to the ACLU.  Business Week said the ACLJ is \"the leading advocacy group for religious freedom.\"  Sekulow's work on the issue of judicial nominees - including possible vacancies at the Supreme Court - has received extensive news coverage including a front page story in The Wall Street Journal.  In addition, The National Law Journal has twice named Sekulow one of the \"100 Most Influential Lawyers\" in the United States (1994, 1997).  He is also among a distinguished group of attorneys known as \"The Public Sector 45\" named by The American Lawyer (January\/February 1997).  The magazine said the designation represents \"45 young lawyers outside the private sector whose vision and commitment are changing lives.\" Sekulow brings insight and education to listeners daily with his national call-in radio program, Jay Sekulow Live!, which is broadcast throughout the country on nearly 850 radio stations.  Sekulow also hosts a weekly television program, ACLJ This Week, which tackles the tough issues of the day and is broadcast on a number of networks nationwide including the Trinity Broadcasting Network and FamilyNet.  Sekulow is also a popular guest on nationally televised news programs on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX News, MSNBC, CNBC, and PBS.  He frequently contributes articles and commentary to national publications and is often quoted in the nation's leading newspapers including USA Today, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, and Washington Times. A graduate of Mercer University, Sekulow graduated cum laude receiving both a bachelor's degree and doctor of jurisprudence from Mercer University where he served on the Mercer Law Review as an editorial staff member.  Following graduation, Sekulow served as a tax trial attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service.  In that capacity, Sekulow prepared and brought to trial tax cases on behalf of the United States Department of Treasury in United States Tax Court. He also received a Ph.D. from Regent University, with a dissertation on American Legal History, and is the author of numerous publications and law articles. Sekulow serves as a member of the Board of Trustees for The Supreme Court Historical Society in Washington, DC.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/author\/jsekulow"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/163"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lynnvsekulow\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}