\n
Turkey is a\u00a0rogue state in the truest sense, and its behavior in Syria and Iraq proves this.<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cdn.rt.com\/sites\/375\/2015.07\/original\/55b2a847c46188c62e8b4594.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Turkey chose to bomb Kurdish militias at the worst possible moment, when much of the world is relying on them to fight back against ISIL\/the “Islamic State”<\/i><\/p>\n
If the US was truly committed to its strategy to support Kurdish fighters against ISIL, it might have chosen to bomb Turkey. This is because Turkey is using its military power not to stop ISIL terrorists, but to kill off the Kurdish fighters doing much of the fighting against ISIL. Such fighters are the primary forces being relied on by the US and its allies to fight on the ground against ISIL.<\/strong><\/p>\n About\u00a0a day after Turkey supposedly joined the US-led anti-ISIL coalition backing up the Kurds, Turkey started blowing up Kurds instead of targeting ISIL. Prior to this, commentators\u00a0had begun speculating that Turkey was adjusting its strategic priorities to become a full-fledged member of this international coalition against ISIL, and that perhaps Turkey might have decided to end its obsessions with eliminating Syrian President Assad and attacking Kurdish fighters. Some even speculated that Turkey was going to reach out to the Kurds and form an alliance with them. In reality, Turkey was only trying to deceive its allies and gain some political cover to start killing the very Kurdish fighters that the Americans have been training.<\/p>\n Turkey has proven\u00a0that it has no interest in the security or success of other countries or even the NATO alliance that it is a member of, and is driven by selfish nationalist interests that conflict with other NATO members and with the interests of the Syrian and Iraqi peoples including all the Kurds. Ironically, Turkey kept calling for a no-fly zone in Syria, which it believed would allow Turkey to have more cover to meddle inside Syria’s politics and security and give Turkey carte blanche to bomb Kurds in a large strip of territory in northern\u00a0Syria.<\/p>\n The situation in Syria and Iraq now is absurd. The alliances between states and factions have become so complex and tangled that no party can coordinate any effort without undermining their own allies’ efforts. The US can’t defeat ISIL because its own NATO partners are more interested in defeating the Kurds whom\u00a0the US was paying and training to defeat ISIL. And while the rest of the coalition focuses on giving the Kurds as much support as possible to battle ISIL, the Turks will be bombing the Kurds and nullifying the effectiveness of the entire American strategy. As soon as they receive their American weapons, they are just as likely to\u00a0fall prey to\u00a0Turkish bombs.<\/p>\n In some ways, this type of situation proves that the NATO alliance is a sham and cannot be taken seriously. NATO simply has too many members in different regions of the world for the alliance\u00a0to possibly act in a coordinated or rational way, and its obsession with gaining even more member states is only going to make this problem worse in the future. Once the situation gets violent, the individual states in the NATO alliance tend to simply fend for themselves and the alliance becomes nothing more than some political noise. Turkey repeatedly calls for\u00a0NATO emergency meetings, and has done so again recently, as if to try to get some appearance of legitimacy for its attacks against Kurds. This puts the Obama administration in a very difficult situation, ostensibly allied to both the Kurds and the Turks and trying to satisfy both of them that it holds their security to be more important than the other’s.<\/p>\n In any realistic assessment of the conflict, the US and other coalition members would need to consider Turkey an enemy and not a partner in global efforts\u00a0against ISIL. NATO has proven to be nothing more than a long rope for its members to hang themselves with, as\u00a0the biggest threats of aggression and wanton destruction\u00a0in the NATO area\u00a0come consistently from its own member states and the alliance inhibits possible cooperation against this aggression.<\/p>\n
\n
![\"HJB](\"https:\/\/wp-media.beliefnet.com\/sites\/375\/2014\/08\/HJB-Signature-and-stamp-300x169.jpg\")
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"