{"id":762,"date":"2015-06-27T19:00:55","date_gmt":"2015-06-27T19:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/?p=762"},"modified":"2015-06-27T20:46:15","modified_gmt":"2015-06-27T20:46:15","slug":"third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html","title":{"rendered":"Third Worldists vs. Neoconservatives"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le colonialisme n’est pas une machine \u00e0 penser, n’est pas un corps dou\u00e9 de raison.
\n<\/i><\/p>\n

Colonialism is not a thinking machine, is not a body endowed with reason.<\/p>\n

Frantz Fanon<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Should antistatists and anti-nationalists in the West\u00a0condemn, ignore or support\u00a0small nationalist causes in the non-Western world?<\/h2>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Frantz Fanon:\u00a0political theorist and key influence on countless Third World nationalist causes (including\u00a0ones who fought against each other)<\/i><\/p>\n

This is an issue that has been on my mind recently because of a slight dispute that I had with a fellow political commentator whom I continue to have the utmost respect and admiration for. His view likened nationalists in Pakistan with the neoconservative movement in the United States, and basically put forward the view that someone who refuses to condemn Pakistani nationalists might as well support\u00a0the neoconservatives in the US on the grounds that small imperialist or nationalist causes are as lethal as the bigger ones. This is a\u00a0theory that was never unknown to me or a great many sociologists who are more qualified than I, and I had in fact been rejecting that very theory for years. As cold as it\u00a0sounds, I\u00a0don’t care if a theory is killing people: I am solely interested\u00a0in whether it is effective in weakening hegemony.<\/p>\n

It is not an oversight by me that causes me to not bother condemning nationalism in Pakistan and countless other countries while I condemn it in my own country and more so in the US. It is a well-informed principle, as I shall explain.<\/p>\n

The essay to go to on this subject would be Immanuel Wallerstein’s brilliant piece, “Culture as the Ideological Battleground of the Modern World-System”. I believe it repudiates everything that can be said against the diversity of causes – nationalist and anti-nationalist – that I and other combatants against hegemony have expressed support for.<\/p>\n

One of the great thinkers who inspires much of the non-Western world is Frantz Fanon, the ideological father of postcolonial political theory and the concept of the national liberation struggles that shook the world in the post- World War 2 era. Without the aid of this man’s ink, there would probably have been no Palestine Liberation Organization, no Baath Parties, no Muammar Gaddafi, and possibly no cause of national liberation and pride in the majority of nations today labelled “Third World”. Many of these ideologies stemmed from Algerian national liberation from French colonialism, for which Fanon was a great agitator.<\/p>\n

I will not lie about small nationalist\u00a0causes in the Third World. My own Western sensibilities and internationalist, hyper-\u00a0modernist\u00a0leanings mean that I personally find Third Worldist\u00a0rhetoric inane, its\u00a0causes often misguided. But in the rare junctures where their rhetoric aligns with true liberation struggles and confrontations with hegemony, they stand vindicated. It is in those moments that these regimes, often labelled tyrannies by Western states, become the knights so desperately needed by the world’s oppressed. Gaddafi may have been a monster to the nuanced political elites of the world, but to the peoples of Africa he was universally loved and viewed as an icon. Hence, the elimination of Gaddafi by NATO was in essence an act of racism, a rejection of the values and common destiny felt by the peoples of Africa at the hands of\u00a0a dismissive and arrogant power.<\/p>\n

Were Bashar al-Assad not on the frontline against US aggression, he would likely not be endorsed and admired by so many millions of people throughout the world. He likely would not be in power today. The American government’s\u00a0very obsession with eliminating al-Assad\u00a0has made him more powerful than they could possibly have intended.<\/p>\n

All of this has to do with the theory of the world-system as an ideological battlefield. Those who are perceived to triumph causes of national liberation, whose apparently reactionary slogans and statements align with actual liberation and the battle against hegemony, are\u00a0only superficially reactionary: the actual cause they represent for a marginalized and oppressed country or people is surely not reactionary.<\/p>\n

Samir Amin presents almost exactly the same views in his conclusions that popular nationalism of the Cuban type is actually the most effective ideological vehicle for many oppressed people, and that power ideologies originating in the Third World simply cannot bear the same shame as rhetorically similar\u00a0ideologies that influenced true imperialism as it was exported from Europe. In sum, Western\u00a0liberals\u00a0are not hypocrites to exclude the nationalists, religious extremists or even racists of the Third World from our condemnation of\u00a0such ideology in the West itself.<\/p>\n

<\/h2>\n
\n

By\u00a0Harry J. Bentham<\/a><\/p>\n

\"HJB<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le colonialisme n’est pas une machine \u00e0 penser, n’est pas un corps dou\u00e9 de raison. Colonialism is not a thinking machine, is not a body endowed with reason. Frantz Fanon Should antistatists and anti-nationalists in the West\u00a0condemn, ignore or support\u00a0small nationalist causes in the non-Western world? Frantz Fanon:\u00a0political theorist and key influence on countless Third…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":577,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,8,68,71,63,37,72,153,67,66,40,15,69],"tags":[844,850,843,841,653,236,855,845,842,849,846,853,857,851,852,854,856,847,848],"class_list":["post-762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alter-globalization","category-antistatism","category-conflict-2","category-conflict-resolution","category-futurism-2","category-history","category-international-relations","category-lordre-2","category-middle-east","category-politics-2","category-publishing","category-us","category-violence","tag-algeria","tag-baath-parties","tag-black-racism","tag-black-racists","tag-exceptionalism","tag-immanuel-wallerstein","tag-iranian-nationalism","tag-liberation","tag-malcolm-x","tag-muammar-gaddafi","tag-national-liberation","tag-nationalisms","tag-pakistani-nationalism","tag-palestine-liberation-organization","tag-palestinian-nationalism","tag-power-ideologies","tag-syrian-nationalism","tag-third-world","tag-third-worldism-frantz-fanon"],"yoast_head":"\nThird Worldists vs. Neoconservatives - L'Ordre<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Third Worldists vs. Neoconservatives - L'Ordre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le colonialisme n’est pas une machine \u00e0 penser, n’est pas un corps dou\u00e9 de raison. Colonialism is not a thinking machine, is not a body endowed with reason. Frantz Fanon Should antistatists and anti-nationalists in the West\u00a0condemn, ignore or support\u00a0small nationalist causes in the non-Western world? Frantz Fanon:\u00a0political theorist and key influence on countless Third…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"L'Ordre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-27T19:00:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-27T20:46:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/africaspeaks4africa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Les-h%C3%A9ritiers-sont-aussi-des-inventeurs-Hommage-%C3%A0-F.-Fanon.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Harry J. Bentham\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Third Worldists vs. Neoconservatives - L'Ordre","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Third Worldists vs. Neoconservatives - L'Ordre","og_description":"Le colonialisme n’est pas une machine \u00e0 penser, n’est pas un corps dou\u00e9 de raison. Colonialism is not a thinking machine, is not a body endowed with reason. Frantz Fanon Should antistatists and anti-nationalists in the West\u00a0condemn, ignore or support\u00a0small nationalist causes in the non-Western world? Frantz Fanon:\u00a0political theorist and key influence on countless Third…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html","og_site_name":"L'Ordre","article_published_time":"2015-06-27T19:00:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-27T20:46:15+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/africaspeaks4africa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Les-h%C3%A9ritiers-sont-aussi-des-inventeurs-Hommage-%C3%A0-F.-Fanon.jpg"}],"author":"Harry J. Bentham","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html","name":"Third Worldists vs. Neoconservatives - L'Ordre","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/africaspeaks4africa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Les-h%C3%A9ritiers-sont-aussi-des-inventeurs-Hommage-%C3%A0-F.-Fanon.jpg","datePublished":"2015-06-27T19:00:55+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-27T20:46:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#\/schema\/person\/576f5919c442d93e18909ed47628846e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/africaspeaks4africa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Les-h%C3%A9ritiers-sont-aussi-des-inventeurs-Hommage-%C3%A0-F.-Fanon.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/africaspeaks4africa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Les-h%C3%A9ritiers-sont-aussi-des-inventeurs-Hommage-%C3%A0-F.-Fanon.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/06\/third-worldists-vs-neoconservatives.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Third Worldists vs. Neoconservatives"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/","name":"L'Ordre","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Harry Bentham","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#\/schema\/person\/576f5919c442d93e18909ed47628846e","name":"Harry J. Bentham","description":"Harry J. Bentham is a British futurist blogger who has been a contributor at a number of think tanks including the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies since 2013. His work at Press TV and the L'Ordre blog featured at the multi-faith Beliefnet website has gained increasing attention and praise, including in the international media. Commentaries on political and ethical controversies by Bentham have been published at the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, H+ Magazine, Dissident Voice and numerous other publications. He edits The clubof.info Blog (http:\/\/www.clubof.info\/search\/label\/Harry_J_Bentham).","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Harry-J.-Bentham\/e\/B00D4MSEY0\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/author\/hbentham"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/577"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=762"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/762\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":765,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/762\/revisions\/765"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}