{"id":550,"date":"2015-02-27T23:00:46","date_gmt":"2015-02-27T23:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/?p=550"},"modified":"2015-02-28T20:01:23","modified_gmt":"2015-02-28T20:01:23","slug":"autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html","title":{"rendered":"Autocracy versus autocracy: our democratic states are superior to nothing"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’imagination est la reine du vrai, et le possible est une des provinces du vrai.<\/em><\/p>\n

Imagination is the queen of truth, and the possible is one of the provinces of truth.<\/p>\n

Charles Baudelaire<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

It’s easy to mock dictatorships for being too sensitive and prone to censor information that incriminates them, but are our governments any different?<\/h2>\n

Indeed, one of the most compelling arguments against autocracy is its inflexibility, its crudeness and its intolerance towards dissent. Our democratic\u00a0countries, so called, are not prone to such behavior. Or are they?<\/p>\n

@noirefleur1<\/a> @Po_st<\/a> Our governments oppose free speech as much as a dictatorship, they just have different issues they are sensitive about.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Harry J. Bentham (@hjbentham) February 24, 2015<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It occurred to me recently that our governments in the United States and Europe, while professing to be more democratic and politically legitimate than other regimes, are actually very sensitive to information that they find inconvenient. Their tendency to dismiss autocratic countries as paranoid and inflexible, while\u00a0they themselves live in rampant paranoia about possible subversion and terrorism in their own states and master all the tactics against those\u00a0threats, is astonishing.<\/p>\n

Once we remove all the propaganda about freedom and democracy, the only\u00a0actual difference between our regimes\u00a0and the various dictatorships that humanity overcame in history is\u00a0that ours are sensitive to different kinds of threats. But this difference would be apparent between any two governments, whether alleged dictatorships or alleged democracies.<\/p>\n

The events surrounding WikiLeaks and Edward Snowden demonstrated\u00a0that the US government, far from being in favor of freedom as it claims, is at the forefront of a campaign to stifle access to information (such as the PRISM spying program that Snowden revealed) that would embarrass the US government and others. So what we mean when we say dictators are afraid of freedom of speech is not really to say they are any different from the US government, but to say that they have different, often eccentric priorities. As the people, however, we should be no less offended by the US government’s use of state secrets and censorship than we are offended by\u00a0the state secrets and\u00a0censorship witnessed in a totalitarian dictatorship. The only difference between the two is that they react sensitively to different kinds of speech. While the US government by default isn’t too offended by people commentating on the particular administration’s policies, it is very offended and will take action against anyone it sees as promoting violence against the US state or disclosing information that actually weakens its regime.<\/p>\n

We should be wary of how ready conservative elements in our societies are to break international law and the internal laws of foreign countries while they are so respectful towards the laws in their own country. Even influential corporations such as Google engender this kind of behavior. When the US government takes undemocratic or autocratic actions in the interests of its so-called security, Google is respectful and honors US law and matters of secrecy, no matter how draconian\u00a0these are – the corporation is determined to cooperate with the US state, but at the same time\u00a0Google\u00a0tries to promote disobedience in other countries, actively helping dissidents to hide their identities and circulate information that the government doesn’t like.<\/p>\n

That seems to be the rule guiding the political and corporate elite in our countries – obedience here, disobedience in “authoritarian” countries. In the eyes of our rulers, rival\u00a0states like Iran, Russia and China are simply parties of outlaws, violating the peace\u00a0that “we”, the so-called “west” sustained\u00a0via absolute military and economic power.<\/h2>\n

Hear me out. My call is simply that we all do the opposite of this vile hypocrisy. I am not arguing that people should be cowed and obedient towards the governments of allegedly authoritarian\u00a0countries such as Iran, Russia and China (who are actually considerably less authoritarian than the regimes that the US has supported in their place and wants to replace them with). Rather, I am arguing that we use our technology and the media at our disposal to subvert and challenge our own governments, as Snowden did. I argue that as dissidents, we should actively disobey, damage and dismantle the oppressive US-led global establishment that arrogantly presumes to police\u00a0the world. Seek out the cowering state’s vulnerabilities, the things that it is offended by – and do everything in your power to expose it for the flawed and paranoid\u00a0regime it actually is.<\/p>\n

We need to show people like the US government that they aren’t better than any other autocracy, and that their own regime is equally as fearful, doomed, and utterly undeserving of power as any other regime.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The Global Tyrant: Collected Foreign Policy Commentaries<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\n

By\u00a0Harry J. Bentham<\/a><\/p>\n

\"HJB<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’imagination est la reine du vrai, et le possible est une des provinces du vrai. Imagination is the queen of truth, and the possible is one of the provinces of truth. Charles Baudelaire It’s easy to mock dictatorships for being too sensitive and prone to censor information that incriminates them, but are our governments any…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":577,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,8,353,68,17,72,127,66,40,56,15,89],"tags":[512,514,511,1483,518,90,88,509,517,513,229,239,360,516,515,91],"class_list":["post-550","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alter-globalization","category-antistatism","category-censorship","category-conflict-2","category-edward-snowden","category-international-relations","category-journalism","category-politics-2","category-publishing","category-uk","category-us","category-wikileaks","tag-autocracy-versus-autocracy","tag-china","tag-dictatorships-versus-democracies","tag-edward-snowden","tag-freedom-and-democracy","tag-google","tag-hypocrisy","tag-iran","tag-prism","tag-prism-spying-program","tag-russia","tag-united-states","tag-us-government","tag-us-state","tag-west","tag-wikileaks-2"],"yoast_head":"\nAutocracy versus autocracy: our democratic states are superior to nothing - L'Ordre<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Autocracy versus autocracy: our democratic states are superior to nothing - L'Ordre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"L’imagination est la reine du vrai, et le possible est une des provinces du vrai. Imagination is the queen of truth, and the possible is one of the provinces of truth. Charles Baudelaire It’s easy to mock dictatorships for being too sensitive and prone to censor information that incriminates them, but are our governments any…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"L'Ordre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-02-27T23:00:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-28T20:01:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/ecx.images-amazon.com\/images\/I\/8119tYEGZhL._SL1286_.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Harry J. Bentham\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Autocracy versus autocracy: our democratic states are superior to nothing - L'Ordre","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Autocracy versus autocracy: our democratic states are superior to nothing - L'Ordre","og_description":"L’imagination est la reine du vrai, et le possible est une des provinces du vrai. Imagination is the queen of truth, and the possible is one of the provinces of truth. Charles Baudelaire It’s easy to mock dictatorships for being too sensitive and prone to censor information that incriminates them, but are our governments any…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html","og_site_name":"L'Ordre","article_published_time":"2015-02-27T23:00:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-28T20:01:23+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/ecx.images-amazon.com\/images\/I\/8119tYEGZhL._SL1286_.jpg"}],"author":"Harry J. Bentham","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html","name":"Autocracy versus autocracy: our democratic states are superior to nothing - L'Ordre","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/ecx.images-amazon.com\/images\/I\/8119tYEGZhL._SL1286_.jpg","datePublished":"2015-02-27T23:00:46+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-28T20:01:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#\/schema\/person\/576f5919c442d93e18909ed47628846e"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/ecx.images-amazon.com\/images\/I\/8119tYEGZhL._SL1286_.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/ecx.images-amazon.com\/images\/I\/8119tYEGZhL._SL1286_.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/02\/autocracy-versus-autocracy-our-democratic-states-are-superior-to-no-one.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Autocracy versus autocracy: our democratic states are superior to nothing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/","name":"L'Ordre","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Harry Bentham","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#\/schema\/person\/576f5919c442d93e18909ed47628846e","name":"Harry J. Bentham","description":"Harry J. Bentham is a British futurist blogger who has been a contributor at a number of think tanks including the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies since 2013. His work at Press TV and the L'Ordre blog featured at the multi-faith Beliefnet website has gained increasing attention and praise, including in the international media. Commentaries on political and ethical controversies by Bentham have been published at the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, H+ Magazine, Dissident Voice and numerous other publications. He edits The clubof.info Blog (http:\/\/www.clubof.info\/search\/label\/Harry_J_Bentham).","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Harry-J.-Bentham\/e\/B00D4MSEY0\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/author\/hbentham"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/550","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/577"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=550"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/550\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":557,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/550\/revisions\/557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=550"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=550"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=550"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}