{"id":1233,"date":"2016-03-05T21:27:57","date_gmt":"2016-03-05T21:27:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/?p=1233"},"modified":"2016-03-05T21:28:39","modified_gmt":"2016-03-05T21:28:39","slug":"charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html","title":{"rendered":"Charlie Hebdo and your freedom to hate it"},"content":{"rendered":"

One of the biggest and most pointless arguments made by Islam-haters is that Muslims oppose “freedom of expression”.<\/h2>\n

Today we get artists, musicians, etc.\u00a0trying to be as offensive as possible, who cry out that conservative elements of the public or Muslims are repressive and toxic to liberty as soon as they\u00a0show any sign of anger at being barraged with offensive images. The best examples are\u00a0published by Charlie Hebdo<\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

I consider artists and protesters who\u00a0set out\u00a0to offend members of the public, to be hypocrites. They want the right to offend everyone but they simultaneously don’t want anyone to be allowed to offend them or their work. They want to discriminate against and hurt others e.g. Muslims or Catholics, but put on a whiny display if anyone discriminates against them or hurts them. They insinuate that others are too sensitive and that others need to relax, but actually they are the ones who need to relax.<\/p>\n

As I have already argued in the past<\/a>, even the terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo<\/em>\u00a0actually didn’t actually infringe on\u00a0Charlie Hebdo<\/em>‘s freedom. It simply showed that if you offend people, they can react violently. This has been known for thousands of years and only an imbecile or wingebag would find it extraordinary. I’ll say it again. “Freedom of speech\/expression” laws say nothing about protecting\u00a0publications like Charlie Hebdo<\/em> from being attacked by terrorists or angry members of the public. Such special protection for offensive publications is anti-freedom, because it privileges the\u00a0hated few to offend everyone while enjoying heavy police and government protection from reprisals.<\/p>\n

Freedom of speech or expression, as best captured in the First Amendment of the US Constitution, guarantees freedom to express oneself without reprisals by the government, and freedom to believe whatever one wishes without reprisals from the government. Seen in this light, the “war on terror” waged by western governments (including in France where Charlie Hebdo<\/em> was fiercely protected to an extent that eight-year old kids who refused to support Charlie\u00a0Hebdo<\/em>\u00a0were\u00a0summarily detained and questioned<\/a>) is actually a bigger attack on freedom of expression than the actual terrorism itself.<\/p>\n

In many cases within the west, “terrorism” is only angry members of the public (quite often Muslims, whose lands are occupied, divided and bombed constantly so they feel a need to retaliate) committing murder because of a sense of\u00a0outrage. It is not a foreign threat, it is not a totalitarian state invading the west to take people’s freedoms away. The laws one needs to apply to prevent this are simply the laws against murder, and have nothing to do with freedom of speech or constitutions in any sense. Any\u00a0conversation about “freedom of speech” over what happened at Charlie Hebdo<\/em> is therefore pointless nonsense, a spectacle created by people who don’t even know what they are talking about or are trying to frame this as a clash of civilisations to be resolved by western superiority and conquest<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Freedom of speech, as I recently pointed out in a tweet<\/a>, is absolutely nothing to do with protecting artists from reprisals by random members of the public. Someone who uses their freedom of speech is merely exercising a right\u00a0that the government gave them. No government ever said it would provide security to artists\u00a0so that they cannot be booed, pelted or even stabbed\u00a0by their audience. Of course, if\u00a0someone is\u00a0killed in a violent incident it\u00a0will necessarily involve\u00a0the government because it is murder, but that’s irrelevant to “freedom of speech” or the idiotic narrative of west-vs-Islam.<\/p>\n

In all human interaction, people are normally expected to show a measure of restraint and attempt to minimise offense. People who don’t do this will eventually end up being punched in the face or found dead in a hole somewhere at some point, even in the “freest” society imaginable. Such events, while unfortunate, have nothing to do with an attack on freedom of speech and everything to do with stupidity and lack of vision\u00a0on the part of the person who ends up dead rather than the actual murderer.<\/p>\n

People should not be offensive. They should censor themselves for their own safety from everybody else, as the vast majority of people wisely do. No set of laws will ever be able to protect each individual from everybody else. People are expected to protect themselves, partly by not making enemies and offending everyone they walk past. Publications like Charlie Hebdo<\/em> or the worse Vive Charlie<\/em> publication created in its honour are not expanding the boundaries of freedom, but restricting them. They expect vast and powerful governments to shield and protect them from their audiences and allow them to offend everyone without reprisals.<\/p>\n

The best thing for “freedom” would be to\u00a0treat artists as being no different than anyone else who opens their mouth or writes something. If artists\u00a0are killed for offending people, you should call them idiots, just as you\u00a0would call any\u00a0prankster\u00a0an idiot for insulting the wrong person and getting beaten up or\u00a0killed as a result.<\/p>\n

Alternatively, a world where all reprisals are fiercely prevented\u00a0and Charlie Hebdo<\/em> feels safe will be a world in chains, with significantly hampered freedoms. There would be security guards and cameras posted everywhere. It will be a world where schoolchildren are monitored for any sign of “radicalism” or offense taken to Charlie Hebdo<\/em> images, and while Charlie Hebdo<\/em> is allowed to offend and criticise\u00a0everyone, criticism of\u00a0Charlie Hebdo<\/em> itself is banned.<\/p>\n

It isn’t “freedom” for there to be a\u00a0tiny privileged few being protected by security forces,\u00a0while they offend and chastise a billion powerless and oppressed people’s religious sensibilities.<\/p>\n

\"hjb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

One of the biggest and most pointless arguments made by Islam-haters is that Muslims oppose “freedom of expression”. Today we get artists, musicians, etc.\u00a0trying to be as offensive as possible, who cry out that conservative elements of the public or Muslims are repressive and toxic to liberty as soon as they\u00a0show any sign of anger…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":577,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,68,71,892,127,67,66,40,3,70,1,69],"tags":[363,390,641,882,361,173,567,76],"class_list":["post-1233","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-antistatism","category-conflict-2","category-conflict-resolution","category-islam","category-journalism","category-middle-east","category-politics-2","category-publishing","category-religious-studies","category-religious-violence","category-uncategorized","category-violence","tag-charlie-hebdo","tag-charlie-hebdos-freedom-of-speech","tag-freedom-of-expression","tag-freedom-of-religion","tag-freedom-of-speech","tag-islam","tag-muslims","tag-terrorism"],"yoast_head":"\nCharlie Hebdo and your freedom to hate it - L'Ordre<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Defending Charlie Hebdo and other offensive artists' "freedom" to offend people may eventually require almost a police state to protect them from reprisals.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Charlie Hebdo and your freedom to hate it - L'Ordre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Defending Charlie Hebdo and other offensive artists' "freedom" to offend people may eventually require almost a police state to protect them from reprisals.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"L'Ordre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-03-05T21:27:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-05T21:28:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/hjb-signature-new-opaque-2.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Harry J. Bentham\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Charlie Hebdo and your freedom to hate it - L'Ordre","description":"Defending Charlie Hebdo and other offensive artists' \"freedom\" to offend people may eventually require almost a police state to protect them from reprisals.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Charlie Hebdo and your freedom to hate it - L'Ordre","og_description":"Defending Charlie Hebdo and other offensive artists' \"freedom\" to offend people may eventually require almost a police state to protect them from reprisals.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html","og_site_name":"L'Ordre","article_published_time":"2016-03-05T21:27:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-05T21:28:39+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/hjb-signature-new-opaque-2.png"}],"author":"Harry J. Bentham","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html","name":"Charlie Hebdo and your freedom to hate it - L'Ordre","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/hjb-signature-new-opaque-2.png","datePublished":"2016-03-05T21:27:57+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-05T21:28:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#\/schema\/person\/576f5919c442d93e18909ed47628846e"},"description":"Defending Charlie Hebdo and other offensive artists' \"freedom\" to offend people may eventually require almost a police state to protect them from reprisals.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/hjb-signature-new-opaque-2.png","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/hjb-signature-new-opaque-2.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2016\/03\/charlie-hebdo-and-your-freedom-to-hate-it.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Charlie Hebdo and your freedom to hate it"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/","name":"L'Ordre","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Harry Bentham","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#\/schema\/person\/576f5919c442d93e18909ed47628846e","name":"Harry J. Bentham","description":"Harry J. Bentham is a British futurist blogger who has been a contributor at a number of think tanks including the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies since 2013. His work at Press TV and the L'Ordre blog featured at the multi-faith Beliefnet website has gained increasing attention and praise, including in the international media. Commentaries on political and ethical controversies by Bentham have been published at the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, H+ Magazine, Dissident Voice and numerous other publications. He edits The clubof.info Blog (http:\/\/www.clubof.info\/search\/label\/Harry_J_Bentham).","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Harry-J.-Bentham\/e\/B00D4MSEY0\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/author\/hbentham"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/577"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1233"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1247,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233\/revisions\/1247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}