{"id":1012,"date":"2015-10-18T22:40:19","date_gmt":"2015-10-18T22:40:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/?p=1012"},"modified":"2015-10-18T22:40:19","modified_gmt":"2015-10-18T22:40:19","slug":"un-security-council-inaction-is-good","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html","title":{"rendered":"UN Security Council inaction is good"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-1016 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.beliefnet.com\/sites\/375\/2015\/10\/Cartoon-UN-flag.png\" alt=\"UN Security Council\" width=\"600\" height=\"300\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Many political commentators\u00a0complain about the United Nations Security Council (UNSC)&#8217;s inability to solve international crises. And although I am a Jacobin\u00a0who rarely\u00a0defends any political institution, I must defend the UN Security Council.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Security Council is a brute force institution, based on harsh realities rather than idealism. It consists of the five victorious countries of World War 2: Britain, France, America, Russia and China. All possess nuclear weapons, and two, Russia and the US, are far ahead of the rest of the world in terms of ballistic missiles and nuclear weapon stockpiles. All can essentially be divided into two\u00a0strategic military\u00a0blocs\u00a0now, as in the early Cold War.<\/p>\n<p>It is a brute force fact that the countries on the Council cannot be ignored. Upsetting them, or letting them tread on each other, will cause no less than the\u00a0Third World War. While the Security Council is faulted for instances of inaction rather than action, I would argue that its inaction is productive and useful rather than dangerous in any sense.<\/p>\n<p>Most criticisms of the Security Council focus on its inability to join forces against perceived threats and challenges to global peace and security. However, in actual fact, when the Security Council does\u00a0agree on any political-military response to a conveniently weak\u00a0&#8220;aggressor&#8221; country, it kills a lot of people and does not create any peace and security at all. In most cases where the Council acted, clearly\u00a0<em>it should not have acted<\/em>, as the action later proved to be asinine.<\/p>\n<p>Weak countries are consistently targeted by the strong powers who sit permanently on the UN Security Council: Russia, China, Britain, France and America. Weak countries that later become victims of the Security Council when it has been\u00a0swayed towards <a href=\"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/economic-sanctions-on.html\" target=\"_blank\">war and sanctions<\/a>.\u00a0The most recent example is Libya, where a UN Security Council resolution actually justified an attack on the country by the US and its NATO allies.<\/p>\n<p>The US and its NATO allies also wanted to attack Syria and repeat the Libyan process precisely, despite the intervention in Libya being a clear failure to establish peace and security. Such an asinine goal can only indicate political scheming against Syria rather than any rational belief that the result will be democratic or peaceful.<\/p>\n<p>The US and its allies\u00a0complained bitterly that Russia and China were obstructing peace and security by blocking their repeated resolutions <a href=\"http:\/\/www.clubof.info\/2015\/07\/the-assad-chemical-attack-lie-again.html\" target=\"_blank\">to attack Syria<\/a>, despite the fact that Russia and China were acting on the basis that the West had consistently failed to create peace and security when it\u00a0was allowed to act. In other words, Russia and China&#8217;s actions suggested an actual ability to learn from world events, while the US&#8217;s actions suggested an inability to comprehend what it had just done.<\/p>\n<p>While the US might\u00a0have convinced exceptional dimwits\u00a0that it would\u00a0spread democracy to\u00a0Syria, despite\u00a0its\u00a0track record of always killing everyone and always failing to spread democracy, Russia and China were not convinced this time.\u00a0Clearly, the US delegation expects other countries to have the memory span of a fish and the moral character of an imbecile.<\/p>\n<p>Hence, these days, the UN Security Council has become a forum for some countries blocking <a href=\"http:\/\/www.clubof.info\/2015\/10\/us-irrational-actor-against-other-states.html\" target=\"_blank\">Western aggression and irrational wars<\/a>. This\u00a0is the most useful application of the Council, perhaps its only application. Rather than complaining about the UN Security Council preventing global unity on crisis situations, we should be thanking the Council for uniting to accept the illegality of the\u00a0United States attacking\u00a0small\u00a0countries.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, before we call for it to be abolished or revised to include more countries e.g. India, we should remember that the Security Council is our last line of defense against a Third World War. It is not a question of what the Security Council<em> will do<\/em>\u00a0that determines whether it is a good institution. It is a question of what it <em>won&#8217;t do<\/em>. It won&#8217;t justify a nuclear mass suicide by condemning us to war with\u00a0Russia or China, all in the name of empty babble about democracy and freedom. Considering this, I think the Council&#8217;s\u00a0inaction on something like Syria is a gift and not a curse.<\/p>\n<p>The Security Council\u00a0must not be reformed. It must continue to\u00a0exist in its current form, if only to do nothing and to ensure nothing. That\u00a0way we&#8217;re at least still alive, as\u00a0the loons who would start a nuclear war\u00a0are not let out of the box.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-962 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.beliefnet.com\/sites\/375\/2015\/10\/hjb-signature-new-opaque-2.png\" alt=\"hjb signature new opaque 2\" width=\"285\" height=\"58\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Many political commentators\u00a0complain about the United Nations Security Council (UNSC)&#8217;s inability to solve international crises. And although I am a Jacobin\u00a0who rarely\u00a0defends any political institution, I must defend the UN Security Council. The Security Council is a brute force institution, based on harsh realities rather than idealism. It consists of the five victorious countries of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":577,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,68,71,37,72,127,153,67,66,56,15,69],"tags":[87,1242,198,514,1490,140,488,83,1240,229,1241,73,1238,755,1236,985,1237,1481,1239,28,944],"class_list":["post-1012","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alter-globalization","category-conflict-2","category-conflict-resolution","category-history","category-international-relations","category-journalism","category-lordre-2","category-middle-east","category-politics-2","category-uk","category-us","category-violence","tag-aggression","tag-aggressor","tag-britain","tag-china","tag-france","tag-intervention","tag-libya","tag-nato","tag-peace","tag-russia","tag-security","tag-syria","tag-un","tag-un-security-council","tag-un-security-council-reform","tag-united-nations","tag-unsc","tag-us","tag-veto","tag-war","tag-world-war-3"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>UN Security Council inaction is good - L&#039;Ordre<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"UN Security Council inaction is portrayed as a failure of the UN body to confront threats to peace and security. But what if inaction actually prevents war?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"UN Security Council inaction is good - L&#039;Ordre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"UN Security Council inaction is portrayed as a failure of the UN body to confront threats to peace and security. But what if inaction actually prevents war?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"L&#039;Ordre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-10-18T22:40:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/Cartoon-UN-flag.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Harry J. Bentham\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"UN Security Council inaction is good - L&#039;Ordre","description":"UN Security Council inaction is portrayed as a failure of the UN body to confront threats to peace and security. But what if inaction actually prevents war?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"UN Security Council inaction is good - L&#039;Ordre","og_description":"UN Security Council inaction is portrayed as a failure of the UN body to confront threats to peace and security. But what if inaction actually prevents war?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html","og_site_name":"L&#039;Ordre","article_published_time":"2015-10-18T22:40:19+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/Cartoon-UN-flag.png"}],"author":"Harry J. Bentham","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html","name":"UN Security Council inaction is good - L&#039;Ordre","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/Cartoon-UN-flag.png","datePublished":"2015-10-18T22:40:19+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-18T22:40:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#\/schema\/person\/576f5919c442d93e18909ed47628846e"},"description":"UN Security Council inaction is portrayed as a failure of the UN body to confront threats to peace and security. But what if inaction actually prevents war?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/Cartoon-UN-flag.png","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/files\/2015\/10\/Cartoon-UN-flag.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/2015\/10\/un-security-council-inaction-is-good.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UN Security Council inaction is good"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/","name":"L&#039;Ordre","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Harry Bentham","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/#\/schema\/person\/576f5919c442d93e18909ed47628846e","name":"Harry J. Bentham","description":"Harry J. Bentham is a British futurist blogger who has been a contributor at a number of think tanks including the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies since 2013. His work at Press TV and the L'Ordre blog featured at the multi-faith Beliefnet website has gained increasing attention and praise, including in the international media. Commentaries on political and ethical controversies by Bentham have been published at the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, H+ Magazine, Dissident Voice and numerous other publications. He edits The clubof.info Blog (http:\/\/www.clubof.info\/search\/label\/Harry_J_Bentham).","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Harry-J.-Bentham\/e\/B00D4MSEY0\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/author\/hbentham"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1012","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/577"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1012"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1012\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1019,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1012\/revisions\/1019"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/lordre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}