{"id":96,"date":"2005-05-12T06:02:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-12T06:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html"},"modified":"2005-05-12T06:02:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-12T06:02:00","slug":"via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html","title":{"rendered":"Via negativa and Emergent rhetoric"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div>\n<p>Theologians at least since Luther, who was developing the rhetoric of Nicolas of Cusa, have often used what is called the <span style=\"font-style: italic\">via negativa<\/span>. In essence, the <span style=\"font-style: italic\">via negativa<\/span> is to describe something (say the Emergent movement) by saying what is not (say, not traditional Evangelicalism). Luther is known for his rhetoric about the theology of glory and the theology of the cross.<\/p>\n<p>First, this sort of rhetorical strategy typifies those who are forming their own boundary lines so that their own identity is clear.<\/p>\n<p>Second, it is also a provocative and famously communicative form of rhetoric: if someone asks me if I am a baseball fan, as I was recently asked when speaking in New York, I said right away, &#8220;I am not a Yankee fan.&#8221; Now I was not saying I was not a baseball fan, but I was making an important fan &#8212; and I&#8217;ll let you guess what I think about George Steinbrenner and about baseball.<\/p>\n<p>Third, the <span style=\"font-style: italic\">via negativa<\/span> has its limits and this needs to be recognized: the <span style=\"font-style: italic\">via negativa&#8217;s<\/span> negatives are not always opposites or complete alternatives. If someone asks me what kind of a theology I espouse and I say, &#8220;Well, I&#8217;m not Calvinist or Arminian or Lutheran or Baptist&#8230;&#8221; that does not mean that I think everything about any of those positions is completely wrong. In fact, I like lots of things in each of these systems. The <span style=\"font-style: italic\">via negativa<\/span> approach sets out alternatives, draws a line in the sand, but in so doing it recognizes that this rhetoric is just as much rhetoric as it is substance. And, another of its limits is that it useful only for a time and yet another is that it does not often give us the best answer to what we are looking for.<\/p>\n<p>Fourth, I&#8217;m wondering if Jesus&#8217; statement &#8220;if you do not hate your parents&#8221; statement is not an early precursor of the <span style=\"font-style: italic\">via negativa<\/span>. We all know that Jesus wasn&#8217;t urging hatred, but comparative love.<\/p>\n<p>And I wonder if the Emergent use of <span style=\"font-style: italic\">via negativa<\/span> is not also comparative love. Or ought to be.<\/p>\n<div style=\"clear:both;padding-bottom: 0.25em\"><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Theologians at least since Luther, who was developing the rhetoric of Nicolas of Cusa, have often used what is called the via negativa. In essence, the via negativa is to describe something (say the Emergent movement) by saying what is not (say, not traditional Evangelicalism). Luther is known for his rhetoric about the theology of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":298,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-96","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-emerging-movement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Via negativa and Emergent rhetoric - Jesus Creed<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Via negativa and Emergent rhetoric - Jesus Creed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Theologians at least since Luther, who was developing the rhetoric of Nicolas of Cusa, have often used what is called the via negativa. In essence, the via negativa is to describe something (say the Emergent movement) by saying what is not (say, not traditional Evangelicalism). Luther is known for his rhetoric about the theology of&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jesus Creed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2005-05-12T06:02:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"xscot mcknight\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Via negativa and Emergent rhetoric - Jesus Creed","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Via negativa and Emergent rhetoric - Jesus Creed","og_description":"Theologians at least since Luther, who was developing the rhetoric of Nicolas of Cusa, have often used what is called the via negativa. In essence, the via negativa is to describe something (say the Emergent movement) by saying what is not (say, not traditional Evangelicalism). Luther is known for his rhetoric about the theology of&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html","og_site_name":"Jesus Creed","article_published_time":"2005-05-12T06:02:00+00:00","author":"xscot mcknight","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html","name":"Via negativa and Emergent rhetoric - Jesus Creed","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#website"},"datePublished":"2005-05-12T06:02:00+00:00","dateModified":"2005-05-12T06:02:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/9c0db2eaf4d047d76276f907b62843f0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/05\/via-negativa-and-emergent-rhet.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Via negativa and Emergent rhetoric"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/","name":"Jesus Creed","description":"Scot McKnight on Jesus and orthodox faith for today","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/9c0db2eaf4d047d76276f907b62843f0","name":"xscot mcknight","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/1f0\/1f0cb0f88d1f99f6e05597a2de7f1949x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/1f0\/1f0cb0f88d1f99f6e05597a2de7f1949x96.jpg","caption":"xscot mcknight"},"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/author\/xscot-mcknight"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/298"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}