{"id":372,"date":"2005-09-22T08:43:12","date_gmt":"2005-09-22T08:43:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html"},"modified":"2005-09-22T08:43:12","modified_gmt":"2005-09-22T08:43:12","slug":"frankes-character-of-theology-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html","title":{"rendered":"Franke&#8217;s Character of Theology 3"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In this third post <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jesuscreed.org\/?p=431\">in a series<\/a> on Franke&#8217;s understanding of what theology is, we will look at what he says about the nature of theology.  (By the way, Baker puts too many words on a page.)<br \/>\nFranke, many will know, worked with Stan Grenz on a postfoundational approach to theology and in this book he charts his own understanding of what theology itself is. I don&#8217;t know why more emergent types aren&#8217;t talking more about Franke&#8217;s book, because this is a sophisticated statement of a postconservative approach to theology. If I were the President of an emerging movement seminary, I&#8217;d make everyone buy this book (and I&#8217;d ask Franke to teach his way through the whole thing in a semester). And then we&#8217;d all go out for a beer (we&#8217;d invite Al Mohler but he&#8217;d have to say &#8220;no&#8221;, but all those Wheaton profs could come).<!--more|inline--><br \/>\nBrief on the 3d chapter<br \/>\nTheology itself, our articulations of biblical story, is three things: contextually-shaped (but not determined), second-order rather than first-order (theological lingo for it being less than God and Scripture), and ongoing (each generation must articulate theology for its culture). The fundamental implication of these three points is simple: no one theology can reign supreme since each theology is contextually-shaped by its culture.<br \/>\nMore detailed thoughts<br \/>\nFranke works at our contextually-shaped theology by examining liberalism&#8217;s focus on experience and evangelicalism&#8217;s &#8220;concordance&#8221; approach [I was pleased to see that what he says here is similar to the things I was saying in my post <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jesuscreed.org\/?p=403\">on the unity of Scripture<\/a>]. He reminds evangelicalism that there is no &#8220;pure gospel&#8221; that can be &#8220;contextualized&#8221; but that the gospel itself is embedded in a cultural shape just as Jesus was himself embedded in a cultural shape.<br \/>\nHe illustrates this with a lengthy (too lengthy I would say) look at Origen as a man of his time who, though denounced as a heretic at the time, is gaining some of his reputation back.<br \/>\nTheology and culture interact in one of three ways: correlation (which uses the philosophical model to shape what one can find in Scripture), the translational model (which tends to assume that Scripture is without cultural shape), and Franke&#8217;s suggestion of an interactionist model. This last view is deeply suggestive, provocative, and intriguing: &#8220;theology emerges through an ongoing conversation involving both gospel and culture&#8221; (103).<br \/>\nTheology is second-order: only God and Scripture are first order. All theology is therefore second-order and subject to change, to modification, and to discussion &#8212; hey, why not just say it, &#8220;conversation.&#8221;<br \/>\nTradition has been treated in one of two ways in the Church: it has either been marginalized as ancient junk that is of little use for us today (liberalism) or it has been (here I make up a word in good sociological fashion) &#8220;infallibilized.&#8221;<br \/>\nFranke returns to his point: theology is second-order and culturally- embedded and therefore it must be an ongoing process of conversation.<br \/>\nFrom what I&#8217;m seeing, Franke is urging for a purple theology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this third post in a series on Franke&#8217;s understanding of what theology is, we will look at what he says about the nature of theology. (By the way, Baker puts too many words on a page.) Franke, many will know, worked with Stan Grenz on a postfoundational approach to theology and in this book&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":298,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,14,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-emerging-movement","category-theology"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Franke&#039;s Character of Theology 3 - Jesus Creed<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Franke&#039;s Character of Theology 3 - Jesus Creed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In this third post in a series on Franke&#8217;s understanding of what theology is, we will look at what he says about the nature of theology. (By the way, Baker puts too many words on a page.) Franke, many will know, worked with Stan Grenz on a postfoundational approach to theology and in this book&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jesus Creed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2005-09-22T08:43:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"xscot mcknight\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Franke's Character of Theology 3 - Jesus Creed","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Franke's Character of Theology 3 - Jesus Creed","og_description":"In this third post in a series on Franke&#8217;s understanding of what theology is, we will look at what he says about the nature of theology. (By the way, Baker puts too many words on a page.) Franke, many will know, worked with Stan Grenz on a postfoundational approach to theology and in this book&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html","og_site_name":"Jesus Creed","article_published_time":"2005-09-22T08:43:12+00:00","author":"xscot mcknight","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html","name":"Franke's Character of Theology 3 - Jesus Creed","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#website"},"datePublished":"2005-09-22T08:43:12+00:00","dateModified":"2005-09-22T08:43:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/9c0db2eaf4d047d76276f907b62843f0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/2005\/09\/frankes-character-of-theology-2.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Franke&#8217;s Character of Theology 3"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/","name":"Jesus Creed","description":"Scot McKnight on Jesus and orthodox faith for today","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/9c0db2eaf4d047d76276f907b62843f0","name":"xscot mcknight","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/1f0\/1f0cb0f88d1f99f6e05597a2de7f1949x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/1f0\/1f0cb0f88d1f99f6e05597a2de7f1949x96.jpg","caption":"xscot mcknight"},"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/author\/xscot-mcknight"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/298"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/jesuscreed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}