<\/p>\n
By Deepak Chopra, M.D., FACP
\nMurali Doraiswamy, MD, Professor of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center
\nRudolph E. Tanzi, Ph.D., Joseph P. and Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology at Harvard University and Director of the Genetics and Aging Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital
\nMenas Kafatos, Ph.D., Fletcher Jones Endowed Professor in Computational Physics, Chapman University.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
In our previous articles, we challenged a cherished point of view, that reality is material and external. \u00a0There is a world \u201cout there\u201d that that every baby plops into when it is born.\u00a0 Convincing someone that this\u00a0didn’t\u00a0really happen is disturbing, and among scientists, whose worldview depends on the material world being real, hackles are raised as soon as you say otherwise.\u00a0\u00a0 But we\u00a0aren’t\u00a0straying outside science in the quantum era. Our basic point, that the physical world lost its reassuring status a hundred years ago when the quantum revolution began \u2013 is beyond dispute.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
But the fact that every particle in the universe winks in and out of the quantum field, or that particles can transition into waves that spread in all directions doesn\u2019t strike very close to home. Quantum physicists get into their cars every morning with no fear that the engine will vanish into a cloud of energy.\u00a0 But this new, nonmaterial reality actually lies much closer than anyone supposes.\u00a0 The human brain is where the quantum meets the road, with far-reaching implications.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
What if there is physical evidence that the brain is a quantum device, and that its design reflects the cosmos in an uncanny way that cannot be by chance? \u00a0In the Vedic tradition of India, it is held that \u201cas is the smallest, so is the greatest. As is the microcosm, so is the macrocosm.\u201d\u00a0 We\u2019re using modern terminology, but the concept is timeless: Nature is coherent from its subtlest level to its grossest.\u00a0 Some clues to this truth are visual – the helix that appears in DNA and in spiral nebulas, for example.\u00a0 Hard science isn\u2019t moved by casual resemblances, however.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
To tighten the parallels, one can turn to recent work by physicists including Dmitri Krioukov and reported in mainstream journal like Nature\u2019s Scientific Reports<\/em>. To quote: \u00a0The \u201cuniverse may be growing in the same way as a giant brain – with the electrical firing between brain cells ‘mirrored’ by the shape of expanding galaxies.\u201d \u00a0Looking at simulations of galaxy interconnections in the early universe and neuron interconnections makes it virtually impossible to tell them apart. The brain and the cosmos, like the Internet, are networks, and they evolve the same way. The result, the authors argue, is that the universe really <\/em>does grow like a brain. In a related article in the prestigious journal Science<\/em>, researchers have discovered that the connections in the brain are highly organized, the brain\u2019s structure is like a grid of city wiring, the neurons traversing in all directions.<\/p>\n Several years ago the philosopher Clark Glymour at Carnegie Mellon University published an intriguing paper titled \u201cWhen is a brain like the planet?\u201d He provocatively concluded that when it thinks, the brain parallels the ecology of our planet. A phenomenon like El Nino, which is coordinated with weather events far away in Africa, is similar time series correlations observed in an fMRI brain scan.\u00a0 (Similarly, Greek seismologists at the University of Athens have concluded that the tremors before an earthquake are identical to the heart patterns before a heart attack. \u00a0)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The similarities in physical systems can be inexplicable. We ourselves noticed that the number of neurons in a brain (about 100 billion) is on the same order of magnitude as the number of trees on the Earth (estimated by NASA to be about 400 billion). In their actual physical appearance, neurons look like trees with a main trunks (axon) and branches (dendrites, which comes from the Greek word \u201cDendron\u201d or tree). Neurons connect together in a tree-to-tree fashion as their branches nearly touch. \u00a0The life of a single neuron is as entangled with every other neuron as the trees in a rain forest. The number of synapses in different neurons (neurons come in many varieties) vary from around 1,000, to 200,000 for large Purkinje cells. Trees have branches that show a self-similar pattern from a few hundred to more than 100,000.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n It\u2018s hard for a neuroscientist to look up at trees and not see even more intricate parallels. Trees receive \u201cinformation\u201d in the form of carbon dioxide, sunlight, and water to produce the oxygen that sustains life on Earth. Animals in turn produce carbon dioxide, which forms a feedback loop back to trees which are fed by it. In a sense oxygen and carbon dioxide, flowing through every living system, are like neurotransmitters. The synapses where brain activity occurs from neuron to neuron are organized through feedback, with one side feeding chemicals to the other.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The fact is that all systems seem to be self-organized, from the complex way that replicant RNA organizes a new strand of DNA to the way the brain produces a single picture of reality that organizes the firing of billions of neurons. \u00a0The constants that rule the evolution of the universe are so precise that stars are organized to live through definite, orderly stages, and the formation of galaxies from interstellar dust follows its own life cycle.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n In recent decades it has become established that a single cell is a system, as is the brain, and the entire body \u2013 you are presiding over an entire ecology, and like planetary ecology, everything finds a delicate balance. The phenomenon of homeostasis is the body\u2019s way of balancing hundreds of different functions (e.g., blood pressure, body temperature, the symphony of hormones coursing through the blood stream, digestion, respiration, and waking and sleeping). It strikingly mirrors planetary ecology and its living response to forces of balance and imbalance.\u00a0 The Gaia hypothesis, which looks upon the Earth as a single organism, may well apply to our own bodies as cells in the body of the cosmos.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201cAs is the smallest, so is the greatest\u201d has come full circle from ancient wisdom to modern science once we accept that every system is driven by feedback loops, homeostasis, and continuing self-organization. At this point, it is up to dissenters to prove that we aren\u2019t inhabiting a living universe, tied into it by the most fundamental characteristics of biological systems.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n If it seems too much to grant that the universe is a living organism, that point isn\u2019t necessary. What we wanted to show in this article is that the material world isn\u2019t primary but secondary. Without homeostasis, feedback loops, and self-organization drive every level of Nature \u2013 they are invisible and intangible.\u00a0 Without them, the fine- tuned universe couldn\u2019t exist, or the fine-tuned human brain.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n There are further horizons to cross. Might it be that forests here on Earth are not only responsible for energy generation but also connect planetary consciousness to cosmic consciousness? This may not be just bold speculation. If indeed the universe behaves like a brain, then why wouldn\u2019t it harbor universal consciousness? After all, if the \u201chardware\u201d looks the same, then the \u201csoftware\u201d that creates coherence at every level might be the same.\u00a0 Even though everyone uses phrases like \u201cI\u2019m making up my mind\u201d and \u201cMy mind\u2019s not very sharp today,\u201d the \u201cmy\u201d is only an assumption.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n When you get out of the shower, you are wet; you don\u2019t say, \u201cThis is my wet.\u201d\u00a0 General qualities aren\u2019t individual. You can\u2019t call the Earth\u2019s atmosphere \u201cmy air.\u201d In the same way, human pride in being able to think and reason may be a false assumption. The great quantum pioneer Erwin Schr\u00f6dinger thought so:<\/p>\n There is obviously only one alternative, namely the unification of minds or consciousness\u2026. [I]n truth there is only one mind.<\/em><\/p>\n The implication is that just as our bodies are cells in the body of the universe, our consciousness is immersed in the universal mind. But how would we go about validating this scientifically? Going beyond resemblances in Nature, systems give us a toehold – \u00a0studying the evolution of physical systems on Earth will tell us a lot about the evolution of the brain, and vice versa.<\/p>\n If the universe is encoded in the brain, then perhaps \u201cinsights\u201d that scientists and philosophers have had in the past (breakthrough thoughts about reality) are not be so mysterious. \u00a0Einstein was astonished that relativity, a theory formulated in his mind, turned out to match Nature\u2019s workings with incredible mathematical precision.\u00a0 Such astonishment has evolved beyond amazement by now. The brain is now being examined in the light of quantum biology, and it is dawning that thinking involves quantum operations at the basis where ions exchange charges \u2013 thus exchanging information in a precise, even digital way \u2013 down to a finer level where \u201cnormal\u201d interactions between particles ceases. People do unexpected, strange, weird, and spooky things \u2013 so do quanta.\u00a0 If their weirdness is entangled with ours, there is more than resemblance, parallels, and coincidence. The same source is at work for stars, brains, and thinking.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Perhaps, we are all tapping into cosmic knowledge (the ultimate software), acting as a portal from one piece of hardware to another, from the brain to reality \u201cout there.\u201d Using the same build for the hardware, Nature has allowed us to enter our mental universe, only to discover the infinitude of the conscious universe. \u00a0Infinity is hard to think about, but happily, our brains keep evolving. Having evolved to the point that we can look \u201cout there\u201d and see incredible mathematical orderliness, we\u2019ve reached the horizon where reality may reveal its true source.<\/p>\n (To be cont.)<\/p>\n