By Deepak Chopra, MD, FACP, Menas Kafatos, Ph.D., Fletcher Jones Endowed Professor in Computational Physics, Chapman University, and Rudolph E. Tanzi, Ph.D., Joseph P. and Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology at Harvard University, and Director of the Genetics and Aging Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH).<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n What would it take to make the universe a living thing? What would it take to make it human once again, a secure home for us instead of a cold, meaningless place? What would it take to give God a future? As disconnected as these questions may seem, they are on the minds of some farseeing thinkers. And the deeper one looks, the more it appears that all three issues \u2013 a living universe, a human universe, and a universe that holds a place for God \u2013 start to merge. \u00a0If they actually do merge, nothing will ever be the same again. Not just science but everyday existence will be completely overturned.<\/p>\n There have been great physicists who were deeply religious, such as Sir Isaac Newton, or who had a religious feeling when confronting the universe, such as Albert Einstein, but God isn\u2019t the right place to start with these huge issues. God, in fact, is a red herring. No matter who or what created the universe, it\u2019s here now, and we have to relate to it. How?\u00a0 One of the oldest ideas, which can be found in every culture, holds that Nature is a mirror.\u00a0 We relate to it by seeing ourselves, but not passively. Messages are constantly going back and forth about birth and death about constant change and the bond between our life and Nature itself.\u00a0 To the ancients, a natural disaster \u2013 fire, flood, or earthquake \u2013 showed that Nature was angry. If Nature was appeased, the harvest was good and the sun shone.<\/p>\n It was unquestioned that the universe meant something, and usually it meant that a loving deity had created a special place for his children.<\/p>\n It\u2019s astonishing how quickly a timeless worldview was utterly destroyed by science. The demolition project that included Darwin, Freud, Einstein and all the other quantum pioneers doesn\u2019t need retracting. We relate to a completely mechanistic universe devoid of purpose, one that operates through random chance, perfectly meshed with evolution operating through random genetic mutations. The mirror has shattered. We no longer see ourselves because there\u2019s nothing meaningful to see, no purpose, no Creator. Even more absurd is the notion that Nature is sending us messages \u2013 from the collision of quarks to the collision of galaxies, nothing is happening \u201cout there\u201d to reflect human existence.<\/p>\n It would be ironic if quantum physics demolished its own conclusions, since more than any other science, quantum physics delivered Nature to its present state as random and meaningless. \u00a0Solid physical objects became clouds of invisible energy, the certainty of cause-and-effect turned into \u201cprobability waves,\u201d and time and space became flexible, to the point that a cubic centimeter of empty space contains enormous virtual energy while the arrow of time can turn on itself and go backward. The reliable world of the five senses was undercut by the quantum world, where nothing known to the five senses holds true. It seems totally impossible that the gap between the two worlds could ever be closed.<\/p>\n Yet it can\u2019t remain open, either. Human life is meaningful, not random. It is filled with purpose, intelligence, creativity, and values like love and compassion. If you start at the quantum level, you can\u2019t get there from here. No one has explained how matter and energy acquired purpose, meaning, and all the rest; we are a species with no foundation. We can only relate to the mindless cosmos with a shrug of the shoulders.\u00a0 Electrons and hydrogen atoms floating in the bleakness of outer space bear no resemblance to the electrons and hydrogen atoms in your brain. Their random activity somehow turned into the most orderly, intelligent, creative activity in the known universe. How?<\/p>\n Let\u2019s say we want to take this question personally, instead of leaving it to professional scientists. Reality is an interesting topic, but it becomes a fascinating topic when it\u2019s your personal reality. If you knew where your own intelligence came from, why you are alive, where you are going, and what the next leap in your evolution will be, everything would change for you. In their pursuit of a Theory of Everything, the holy grail of modern physics, scientists neglected a Theory of Me, an explanation for why each of us matters.\u00a0 That, in a nutshell, is what\u2019s at stake.<\/p>\n We are immensely excited by a new science that can fill the gap created by the quantum revolution, which we call qualia science<\/em>.\u00a0 The word quantum was plucked from the Latin dictionary to give the strange new world of subatomic physics a tag. In the same way, qualia, which is Latin for qualities,\u201d is a tag for a world that is as far-reaching as quantum physics but pointing in the opposite direction. Quanta are \u201cpackets\u201d of energy, an innocuous term that wound up having explosive effects. Qualia are the everyday qualities of experience \u2013 light, sound, color, shape, texture \u2013 whose explosive effects are barely hinted at.<\/p>\n You experience the world as qualia. It\u2019s the glue that holds the five senses together. The scent of a rose is a qualia (we\u2019ll use singular and plural as the same word), so is it velvety texture and its crimson color.\u00a0\u00a0 Looking at everyday experience through the perspective of the brain, psychiatrist and neural theorist Daniel Siegel reduced reality \u201cin here\u201d to SIFT: sensation, image, feeling, thought. No matter what\u2019s happening to you right this minute, your brain is registering either a sensation (I\u2019m hot, this room is stuffy, the bed sheets are soft), an image (the sunset is brilliant, I see my grandmother\u2019s face I my mind\u2019s eye, my keys are on the dining room table),\u00a0 a feeling (I\u2019m pretty happy, losing my job makes me worried, I love my kids), or a thought (I\u2019m planning a vacation, I just read an interesting article, I wonder what\u2019s for dinner).<\/p>\n Qualia are everywhere. Nothing can happen without them, which means that if you see the universe using a human brain, reality consists of qualia. If there is a reality that exists outside what we perceive, it is inconceivable, literally. \u00a0Once you subtract everything you can sense, imagine, feel, or think about, there\u2019s nothing. Because qualia are subjective, they directly attack the objectivity of modern science. Because experience is meaningful, qualia attack the model of random, meaningless Nature. Yet even more is at stake.<\/p>\n Since the only way we know reality is through experience, qualia, not quanta, are the building blocks of Nature.<\/p>\n Quantum physics undercut the notion of solid physical objects while attempting to retain the physical universe. Qualia science says that this is a cheat. The physical universe needs to be tossed out as a frame of reference.<\/p>\n In its most outrageous claim, qualia science declares that only subjectivity is reliable. So-called objective measurements are a disguise for the total fluidity of experience. The universe we carefully measure is merely the reflection of the human nervous system. Even a die-hard materialist (the preferred term is now \u201cphysicalist\u201d) like Stephen Hawking, who has no doubt that the universe exists \u201cout there\u201d as a given, admits that science doesn\u2019t describe reality. Science measures things and events to deliver data according to a mathematical scheme. Another physicist, Freeman Dyson, says, \u201cLife may have succeeded against all odds in molding a universe to its purposes.\u201d<\/p>\n There is the key: We have created a human universe. Behind the mask of a cosmic machine whose parts can be calculated and tinkered with, the universe is humanized. There is no other way it can exist, in fact, since nothing \u201cout there\u201d can be experienced except in our own consciousness.\u00a0 We are following the trail pioneered by the British physicist David Bohm, among others, when he wrote, David Bohm put it, \u201cIn some sense\u00a0man is a microcosm of the universe; therefore what man is, is a clue to the universe.\u201d<\/p>\n The mirror of nature is back, in other words. Strangely, by dismantling the certainty of time, space, physical objects, and cause-and-effect, quantum physics paved the way for a paradigm shift it could never have predicted.\u00a0 The cosmos has meaning, as we wish to show in the next few posts.<\/p>\n (To be cont.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Deepak Chopra, MD, FACP, is the author of, God: A Story of Revelation<\/em><\/a> (HarperOne).<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Menas Kafatos, Ph.D., Fletcher Jones Endowed Professor in Computational Physics, Chapman University, co author with Deepak Chopra of the forthcoming book, Who Made God and Other Cosmic Riddles. (Harmony)<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n Rudolph E. Tanzi, Ph.D., Joseph P. and Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology at Harvard University, and Director of the Genetics and Aging Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), co author with Deepak Chopra of the forthcoming book, Super Brain: Unleashing the Explosive Power of Your Mind to Maximize Health, Happiness, and Spiritual Well-being.<\/em><\/a> (Harmony)<\/em> <\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n