{"id":13,"date":"2006-09-19T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-19T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html"},"modified":"2006-09-19T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-09-19T12:00:00","slug":"jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html","title":{"rendered":"Jim Wallis to Ralph Reed: Not Liberal nor Conservative"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic\">Part three <\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic\">of a dialogue between Jim Wallis and former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed on the question: &#8220;What should values voters value most?&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Jim Wallis\" src=\"https:\/\/www.sojo.net\/images\/sojomail\/wallis.jpg\" align=\"left\" border=\"0\" hspace=\"5\" vspace=\"5\" \/>You raise several interesting lines of thought in your response, Ralph.  Let  me try to address some of them. <\/p>\n<p>My point that the Religious Right only focuses on one or two issues is not a  \u201cstraw man.\u201d  I\u2019ve looked at the promotional material and program for the  \u201cValues Voters\u201d conference this weekend in Washington.  The major opening  plenary session is titled \u201cThe Preservation Of Traditional Marriage\u201d and the  website promotes a book titled \u201cThe Party of Death,\u201d which claims to detail \u201chow  left-wing radicals, using abortion as their lever, took over the Democratic  Party-and how they have used their power to corrupt our law and politics.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>And I saw several comments here to your post. One said, \u201cI grew up in an  evangelical right-wing conservative denomination, and have been a minister in it  for the past decade. I have been troubled by my tradition for several years over  many things. If conservatives have a huge agenda and are not based on 2 issues,  I&#8217;ve never seen it.\u201d  Another person wrote: \u201cAs one who grew up in an  independent Baptist church and who has an extended family deeply rooted in the  Nazarene church, I can assure you that among such religious conservatives there  are only two or three hot button issues: abortion, gay marriage, and school  prayer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Some of your friends on the Religious Right do have private charitable  agendas. But their political agenda is still mostly about two issues. That\u2019s  what they talk about, that\u2019s what they mobilize around, and that\u2019s what they use  to the partisan advantage of Republicans.  I heartily agree that many  evangelicals now have a much broader agenda and that is precisely the point.<\/p>\n<p>The Religious Right has now lost control of the evangelical political agenda  and here\u2019s why.<\/p>\n<p>One year after the television images of Katrina were seared into our minds,  thirty-seven million Americans still live in poverty, left out and left behind.   Globally, thirty-thousand children die needlessly every day from hunger and  disease.  Certainly poverty is a moral value, and it clearly is for a new  generation of evangelicals.<\/p>\n<p>Despite official indifference and denial, the future of our fragile  environment is in jeopardy as global warming continues unchecked. Caring for the  earth that sustains us is also a moral value which young evangelicals now call  \u201ccreation care.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Insisting on full humanity and dignity for all people by opposing  discrimination and oppression for ethnic or racial reasons, whether  intentionally or due to systemic structures, is a moral imperative. Racism,  human rights, sex trafficking, and genocide in places like Darfur are all now  clearly on the Christian agenda.<\/p>\n<p>Twenty-six hundred Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis are now dead.   Daily violence continues to spiral out of control. The cost and consequences of  a disastrous war, that many now believe is a distraction from the real fight  against terrorism, is a moral issue.  And attacking the war\u2019s opponents as  appeasers does not answer the hard questions.<\/p>\n<p>But you still don\u2019t see many of the issues above on the political agenda of  the Religious Right. In fact, some leaders of the Religious Right have tried to keep  issues like the environment and poverty off the evangelical agenda for fear they  would distract from same-sex marriage and abortion.<\/p>\n<p>The serious breakdown of both family and community in our society must be  addressed. But we need serious solutions, not merely scapegoating others.<\/p>\n<p>And wouldn\u2019t coming together to find common ground in reducing the number of  abortions be better than both the left and the right using it as a political  litmus test?<\/p>\n<p>The desire for integrity in our government is growing across the political  spectrum.  Corruption in government &#8211; how money and power distort and misguide  our political decision-making and even our electoral processes \u2013 offends basic  values. In a political culture with seemingly never-ending scandals, our values  should insist on securing both electoral and lobbying reform, and ending how  pork barrel spending and special interests sway policy decisions.<\/p>\n<p>As I travel around the country, I find that the American people are weary of  the left\/right battle lines but are hungry for a \u201cmoral center\u201d in politics, one  that the media pundits cannot simply pigeonhole with the worn-out labels of  liberal or conservative.  We need a new dialogue that goes beyond those  categories.  I\u2019ll come back to that point in my next post.<\/p>\n<p>You ask about the Democrats on marriage and abortion. When I say that  parenting has become a counter-cultural activity in America, all parents nod  their heads&#8211;both liberal and conservative. But neither party has a genuinely  pro-family agenda. The Democrats, as you point out, make a big mistake of not  speaking the language of family values while Republicans have only an anti-gay  marriage agenda, not a comprehensive family friendly platform that especially  takes the needs of America\u2019s working families into account. And abortion is a  moral issues that Democrats should address (and are beginning to), but so is a  consistent ethic of life (as the Catholics say) which Republicans violate by  focusing only on abortion and ignoring so many of the other greatest threats to  human life and dignity.<\/p>\n<p>The real problem with Democrats is not their views on specific issues, but  their reluctance to speak of their position on issues in moral or religious  language.  That is now changing \u00ad <a href=\"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/story\/194\/story_19473_1.html\">Sen.  Barack Obama<\/a> delivered a major speech on faith and politics at our  conference this summer, <a href=\"http:\/\/inquirer.philly.com\/rss\/news\/091406caseyremarks.pdf\">Robert  Casey<\/a> spoke here in Washington last week, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/09\/18\/AR2006091801046.html\">Sen.  John Kerry<\/a> offered his yesterday.  The American people want our elected  officials make the deep connection between moral values and politics.<\/p>\n<p>It\u00b9s time to build a nation with a new set of moral priorities that advances  the common good for all Americans and speaks in the language of values.  But the  moral agenda must be broader and deeper than the one the Religious Right  continually poses. And a new dialogue on moral values could take us beyond the  old liberal\/conservative political straightjacket and truly move our nation  forward. Do you agree Ralph?<\/p>\n<div style=\"clear:both;padding-bottom:0.25em\"><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Part three of a dialogue between Jim Wallis and former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed on the question: &#8220;What should values voters value most?&#8221; You raise several interesting lines of thought in your response, Ralph. Let me try to address some of them. My point that the Religious Right only focuses on one or two&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":367,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jim Wallis to Ralph Reed: Not Liberal nor Conservative - God&#039;s Politics<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jim Wallis to Ralph Reed: Not Liberal nor Conservative - God&#039;s Politics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Part three of a dialogue between Jim Wallis and former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed on the question: &#8220;What should values voters value most?&#8221; You raise several interesting lines of thought in your response, Ralph. Let me try to address some of them. My point that the Religious Right only focuses on one or two&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"God&#039;s Politics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-09-19T12:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.sojo.net\/images\/sojomail\/wallis.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"jim wallis\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jim Wallis to Ralph Reed: Not Liberal nor Conservative - God&#039;s Politics","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jim Wallis to Ralph Reed: Not Liberal nor Conservative - God&#039;s Politics","og_description":"Part three of a dialogue between Jim Wallis and former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed on the question: &#8220;What should values voters value most?&#8221; You raise several interesting lines of thought in your response, Ralph. Let me try to address some of them. My point that the Religious Right only focuses on one or two&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html","og_site_name":"God&#039;s Politics","article_published_time":"2006-09-19T12:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.sojo.net\/images\/sojomail\/wallis.jpg"}],"author":"jim wallis","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html","name":"Jim Wallis to Ralph Reed: Not Liberal nor Conservative - God&#039;s Politics","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.sojo.net\/images\/sojomail\/wallis.jpg","datePublished":"2006-09-19T12:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2006-09-19T12:00:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/#\/schema\/person\/94d89bc7b736bde5dfa5d912a31f89e4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.sojo.net\/images\/sojomail\/wallis.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.sojo.net\/images\/sojomail\/wallis.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/2006\/09\/jim-wallis-to-ralph-reed-not-l.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jim Wallis to Ralph Reed: Not Liberal nor Conservative"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/","name":"God&#039;s Politics","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/#\/schema\/person\/94d89bc7b736bde5dfa5d912a31f89e4","name":"jim wallis","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"jim wallis"},"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/author\/jim-wallis"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/367"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/godspolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}