{"id":2623,"date":"2012-03-29T16:09:49","date_gmt":"2012-03-29T20:09:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/?p=2623"},"modified":"2012-03-29T16:24:41","modified_gmt":"2012-03-29T20:24:41","slug":"jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html","title":{"rendered":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare is the Issue &#8211; Not the Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_65779765.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-646\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.beliefnet.com\/sites\/240\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_65779765-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\" \/><\/a>The political posturing began long before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the constitutionality of ObamaCare. But, now with arguments concluded, <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/healthwatch\/health-reform-implementation\/218739-supreme-court-divided-in-debate-over-striking-down-entire-health-law\" target=\"_blank\">the political posturing is being ratcheted up<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>While a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rasmussenreports.com\/public_content\/politics\/current_events\/healthcare\/march_2012\/54_expect_u_s_supreme_court_to_overturn_health_care_law\" target=\"_blank\">new poll<\/a> suggests most Americans expect the high court to overturn the pro-abortion, government-run health care law,\u00a0the fact is this will be a very close case.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s both interesting and troubling is the fact that some on the Left are attempting to put the Supreme Court itself &#8216;on trial&#8217; for ObamaCare. At least one liberal group contends if the Justices reject ObamaCare including\u00a0the individual mandate, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance under penalty of law, this will play into the hands of President Obama&#8217;s re-election campaign which would use this loss as a rallying point to challenge an activist judiciary.<\/p>\n<p>The truth is ObamaCare is not unique when it comes to controversial constitutional issues that are decided by the nine Justices. It is certainly more high-profile than most, with ramifications that truly affect every American. But this is exactly what our high court was created to do. Tackle the tough issues. Sort out the constitutional consequences. Make a decision.<\/p>\n<p>In a discussion today on FOX News, I made it clear that most Americans understand that if President Obama&#8217;s landmark measure is scrapped by the high court, and many believe it could be, the outcome of this case underscores exactly what our Founders intended &#8211; an independent judiciary doing what it is supposed to do.<\/p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=aVA2qvQLUME\">http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=aVA2qvQLUME<\/a>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong. There&#8217;s going to be plenty of discussion in this presidential campaign about judges and the judiciary. And, there should be. But that needs to focus on the type of judicial nominees the candidates will put forth &#8211; nominees who either uphold the Constitution and the rule of law, or nominees who see the Constitution as a changing document open to interpretation.<\/p>\n<p>We will get the Supreme Court decision on ObamaCare at the end of the term &#8211; likely at the end of June. It will be significant and sweeping no matter what the Court ultimately determines.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/specials\/packages\/article\/0,28804,1993235_1993243_1993317,00.html\" target=\"_blank\">Jay Sekulow<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The political posturing began long before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the constitutionality of ObamaCare. But, now with arguments concluded, the political posturing is being ratcheted up. While a new poll suggests most Americans expect the high court to overturn the pro-abortion, government-run health care law,\u00a0the fact is this will be a very&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":401,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,8],"tags":[524,67,6,70,621,764,622],"class_list":["post-2623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-obamacare","category-supreme-court","tag-affordable-care-act","tag-commerce-clause","tag-constitution","tag-individual-mandate","tag-justices","tag-obamacare","tag-scotus"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare is the Issue - Not the Supreme Court - Faith &amp; Justice<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare is the Issue - Not the Supreme Court - Faith &amp; Justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The political posturing began long before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the constitutionality of ObamaCare. But, now with arguments concluded, the political posturing is being ratcheted up. While a new poll suggests most Americans expect the high court to overturn the pro-abortion, government-run health care law,\u00a0the fact is this will be a very&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Faith &amp; Justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-03-29T20:09:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-03-29T20:24:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_65779765-300x199.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jay Sekulow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare is the Issue - Not the Supreme Court - Faith &amp; Justice","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare is the Issue - Not the Supreme Court - Faith &amp; Justice","og_description":"The political posturing began long before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the constitutionality of ObamaCare. But, now with arguments concluded, the political posturing is being ratcheted up. While a new poll suggests most Americans expect the high court to overturn the pro-abortion, government-run health care law,\u00a0the fact is this will be a very&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html","og_site_name":"Faith &amp; Justice","article_published_time":"2012-03-29T20:09:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-03-29T20:24:41+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_65779765-300x199.jpg"}],"author":"Jay Sekulow","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html","name":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare is the Issue - Not the Supreme Court - Faith &amp; Justice","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_65779765-300x199.jpg","datePublished":"2012-03-29T20:09:49+00:00","dateModified":"2012-03-29T20:24:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/#\/schema\/person\/fd4c384af0620d4b82ae09cf1d77bdb4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_65779765-300x199.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_65779765-300x199.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2012\/03\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-is-the-issue-not-the-supreme-court.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare is the Issue &#8211; Not the Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/","name":"Faith &amp; Justice","description":"Jay Sekulow - ACLJ","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/#\/schema\/person\/fd4c384af0620d4b82ae09cf1d77bdb4","name":"Jay Sekulow","description":"Jay Sekulow is Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization that focuses on constitutional law. He is also Chief Counsel of the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ). Jay Sekulow is one of the leading defenders of constitutional rights and religious liberties in the United States. Over the past 25 years, Jay Sekulow has amassed an unparalleled record of accomplishment, arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court on 12 occasions. His aggressive litigation strategy before the Supreme Court has led to many landmark First Amendment victories. In his first case before the Supreme Court, Jews for Jesus, Jay Sekulow secured the right of religious groups to pass out tracks in airports. In Mergens, Jay Sekulow successfully protected the right of students to form Bible clubs and prayer groups on public school campuses. In Lamb\u2019s Chapel, Jay Sekulow cleared the way for churches to have equal access to public facilities in the same way that other groups are permitted to utilize those facilities. In the Bray and Operation Rescue cases, Jay Sekulow protected the free speech rights of pro-life advocates to be free from criminal prosecution for conveying their pro-life message. In McConnell v. FEC, Jay Sekulow protected the right of young people to engage in the political process by donating to the campaign of their choice. In Pleasant Grove, Jay Sekulow paved the way for governments to be able to display Ten Commandments monuments, and other monuments of their choosing, in public parks. Through the ACLJ, Jay Sekulow engages the political, legal, and cultural battles facing America today. He routinely works with Members of Congress, advising them on proposed legislation and representing them in critical legal matters. Jay Sekulow has also testified before Congress on the constitutionality of proposed legislation. Also, in addition to being a successful Supreme Court advocate, Jay Sekulow is a highly respected broadcaster. Jay Sekulow is the host of Jay Sekulow Live! which airs each weekday on over 850 radio stations nationwide, in addition Sirius and XM satellite radio. He brings insight and education to listeners daily through this national call-in radio program. He is also the host of the ACLJ This Week, the ACLJ\u2019s weekly television program. Jay Sekulow regularly appears on major media outlets, including FOX News, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC, where he is sought out for his vast experience in constitutional law and his unique insight into many of the pressing legal and political issues facing America today. He is frequently quoted in the nation's leading newspapers and often contributes opinion editorials to national publications. Jay Sekulow has also published numerous law review and other scholarly articles. Jay Sekulow has received numerous honors for his groundbreaking legal work in the area of free speech and religious liberties. The Legal Times has named Sekulow one of \u201cThe 90 Greatest Washington Lawyers of the Last 30 Years\u201d and the National Law Journal has twice named Sekulow one of the \u201c100 Most Influential Lawyers\u201d in the United States. In addition, TIME Magazine listed Jay Sekulow as one of the \"25 Most Influential Evangelicals\" in America. Jay Sekulow\u2019s legal work in defense of religious liberties and human rights extends beyond the United States, having founded the ECLJ in Strasbourg, France, which maintains consultative status with the United Nations. He has also opened offices in Pakistan, Africa, and Jerusalem, Israel. Jay Sekulow is a staunch defender of Israel, presenting arguments before the International Criminal Court at the Hague. His efforts in support of Israel\u2019s right to defend itself from terrorist attacks have been commended by Israeli government officials, one official stating, \"Jay was instrumentally-involved in projects that the President of Israel and the Prime Minister put on our national agenda.\" Jay Sekulow also has a passion for educating the next generation of religious liberty advocates. He is a member of the Regent University Law School Faculty as a Distinguished Professor of Law and routinely teaches courses on constitutional law and presents guest lectures. Jay Sekulow has also started educational programs in international human rights law in Strasbourg, France and at Handong University in South Korea. Jay Sekulow is a graduate of Mercer University, earning both a bachelor\u2019s degree and doctor of jurisprudence. Sekulow served on the editorial staff of the Mercer Law Review and graduated cum laude. He later earned a Ph.D. from Regent University, writing his dissertation on American Legal History. Jay Sekulow also serves on the Board of Trustees for The Supreme Court Historical Society in Washington, D.C. Jay Sekulow, ACLJ Chief Counsels full biography and video. Jay Sekulow on Facebook. Jay Sekulow on Twitter. Jay Sekulow on YouTube.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/author\/jay_sekulow"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/401"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2623"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2623\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2638,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2623\/revisions\/2638"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}