{"id":1542,"date":"2011-11-08T14:02:26","date_gmt":"2011-11-08T19:02:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/?p=1542"},"modified":"2011-11-29T15:14:32","modified_gmt":"2011-11-29T20:14:32","slug":"jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html","title":{"rendered":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare Decision Disappointing &#8211; Appeal to Come"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_2452518.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-639\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.beliefnet.com\/sites\/240\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_2452518-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a>It&#8217;s a decision that is disappointing. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/appeals-court-upholds-obama-health-care-law-161931692.html\" target=\"_blank\">rejected our appeal<\/a> in an ObamaCare challenge &#8211; an appeal which argued that the individual mandate, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance, violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>In rejecting our appeal, the appeals court failed to reinstate our federal <a href=\"http:\/\/media.aclj.org\/pdf\/hc-dct-complaint_20100609.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">lawsuit.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/aclj.org\/obamacare\/aclj-to-appeals-court-declare-obamacare-unconstitutional\" target=\"_blank\">We presented oral arguments before the panel in September<\/a>\u00a0and urged the appeals court to declare the individual mandate unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p>Today&#8217;s decision reinforces the fact that the courts are split about this flawed health care law. As we determine our next course of action &#8211; whether to ask the full appeals court to hear the case &#8211; or directly ask the Supreme Court to take the case &#8211; we still remain confident that ObamaCare and the individual mandate, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance, is the wrong prescription for America and ultimately will be struck down as unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>As you may recall, the <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/us-supreme-court-decide-nov-10-health-care-223056071.html\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court is scheduled to consider the issue of ObamaCare<\/a> at a conference\u00a0later this week and could decide within days if and when the high court will tackle the constitutionality of the health care law.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to our lawsuit, we have backed legal challenges by Florida and Virginia. In fact, last month, we filed an <a href=\"http:\/\/c0391070.cdn2.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com\/pdf\/florida-scotus-aclj-amicus-brief-obamacare.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">amicus brief with the Supreme Court<\/a>\u00a0urging the Justices to take up the Florida case challenging ObamaCare. In that brief, <a href=\"http:\/\/aclj.org\/obamacare\/aclj-105-members-of-congress-urge-scotus-to-reject-obamacare\" target=\"_blank\">we represent 105 members of Congress &#8211; including House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.<\/a> We also represent more than 29,000 Americans who have signed on to our committee opposing ObamaCare. In our amicus brief, we urge the high court to hear the case and declare the entire health care law unconstitutional.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>As we determine what our next course of action will be regarding an appeal in our case, we will be watching the Supreme Court closely in the days ahead.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/JaySekulow\">Jay Sekulow<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s a decision that is disappointing. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit\u00a0rejected our appeal in an ObamaCare challenge &#8211; an appeal which argued that the individual mandate, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance, violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In rejecting our appeal,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":401,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,65,8],"tags":[743,387,71,70,791,764,744,50],"class_list":["post-1542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abortion","category-obamacare","category-supreme-court","tag-aclj","tag-dc-court-of-appeals","tag-florida","tag-individual-mandate","tag-jay-sekulow","tag-obamacare","tag-supreme-court","tag-virginia"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare Decision Disappointing - Appeal to Come - Faith &amp; Justice<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare Decision Disappointing - Appeal to Come - Faith &amp; Justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It&#8217;s a decision that is disappointing. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit\u00a0rejected our appeal in an ObamaCare challenge &#8211; an appeal which argued that the individual mandate, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance, violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In rejecting our appeal,&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Faith &amp; Justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-08T19:02:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2011-11-29T20:14:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_2452518-150x150.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jay Sekulow\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare Decision Disappointing - Appeal to Come - Faith &amp; Justice","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare Decision Disappointing - Appeal to Come - Faith &amp; Justice","og_description":"It&#8217;s a decision that is disappointing. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit\u00a0rejected our appeal in an ObamaCare challenge &#8211; an appeal which argued that the individual mandate, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance, violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In rejecting our appeal,&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html","og_site_name":"Faith &amp; Justice","article_published_time":"2011-11-08T19:02:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2011-11-29T20:14:32+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_2452518-150x150.jpg"}],"author":"Jay Sekulow","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html","name":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare Decision Disappointing - Appeal to Come - Faith &amp; Justice","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_2452518-150x150.jpg","datePublished":"2011-11-08T19:02:26+00:00","dateModified":"2011-11-29T20:14:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/#\/schema\/person\/fd4c384af0620d4b82ae09cf1d77bdb4"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_2452518-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/faithandjustice\/files\/2011\/07\/shutterstock_2452518-150x150.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/2011\/11\/jay-sekulow-obamacare-decision-disappointing-appeal-to-come.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jay Sekulow: ObamaCare Decision Disappointing &#8211; Appeal to Come"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/","name":"Faith &amp; Justice","description":"Jay Sekulow - ACLJ","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/#\/schema\/person\/fd4c384af0620d4b82ae09cf1d77bdb4","name":"Jay Sekulow","description":"Jay Sekulow is Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), a law firm and educational organization that focuses on constitutional law. He is also Chief Counsel of the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ). Jay Sekulow is one of the leading defenders of constitutional rights and religious liberties in the United States. Over the past 25 years, Jay Sekulow has amassed an unparalleled record of accomplishment, arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court on 12 occasions. His aggressive litigation strategy before the Supreme Court has led to many landmark First Amendment victories. In his first case before the Supreme Court, Jews for Jesus, Jay Sekulow secured the right of religious groups to pass out tracks in airports. In Mergens, Jay Sekulow successfully protected the right of students to form Bible clubs and prayer groups on public school campuses. In Lamb\u2019s Chapel, Jay Sekulow cleared the way for churches to have equal access to public facilities in the same way that other groups are permitted to utilize those facilities. In the Bray and Operation Rescue cases, Jay Sekulow protected the free speech rights of pro-life advocates to be free from criminal prosecution for conveying their pro-life message. In McConnell v. FEC, Jay Sekulow protected the right of young people to engage in the political process by donating to the campaign of their choice. In Pleasant Grove, Jay Sekulow paved the way for governments to be able to display Ten Commandments monuments, and other monuments of their choosing, in public parks. Through the ACLJ, Jay Sekulow engages the political, legal, and cultural battles facing America today. He routinely works with Members of Congress, advising them on proposed legislation and representing them in critical legal matters. Jay Sekulow has also testified before Congress on the constitutionality of proposed legislation. Also, in addition to being a successful Supreme Court advocate, Jay Sekulow is a highly respected broadcaster. Jay Sekulow is the host of Jay Sekulow Live! which airs each weekday on over 850 radio stations nationwide, in addition Sirius and XM satellite radio. He brings insight and education to listeners daily through this national call-in radio program. He is also the host of the ACLJ This Week, the ACLJ\u2019s weekly television program. Jay Sekulow regularly appears on major media outlets, including FOX News, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC, where he is sought out for his vast experience in constitutional law and his unique insight into many of the pressing legal and political issues facing America today. He is frequently quoted in the nation's leading newspapers and often contributes opinion editorials to national publications. Jay Sekulow has also published numerous law review and other scholarly articles. Jay Sekulow has received numerous honors for his groundbreaking legal work in the area of free speech and religious liberties. The Legal Times has named Sekulow one of \u201cThe 90 Greatest Washington Lawyers of the Last 30 Years\u201d and the National Law Journal has twice named Sekulow one of the \u201c100 Most Influential Lawyers\u201d in the United States. In addition, TIME Magazine listed Jay Sekulow as one of the \"25 Most Influential Evangelicals\" in America. Jay Sekulow\u2019s legal work in defense of religious liberties and human rights extends beyond the United States, having founded the ECLJ in Strasbourg, France, which maintains consultative status with the United Nations. He has also opened offices in Pakistan, Africa, and Jerusalem, Israel. Jay Sekulow is a staunch defender of Israel, presenting arguments before the International Criminal Court at the Hague. His efforts in support of Israel\u2019s right to defend itself from terrorist attacks have been commended by Israeli government officials, one official stating, \"Jay was instrumentally-involved in projects that the President of Israel and the Prime Minister put on our national agenda.\" Jay Sekulow also has a passion for educating the next generation of religious liberty advocates. He is a member of the Regent University Law School Faculty as a Distinguished Professor of Law and routinely teaches courses on constitutional law and presents guest lectures. Jay Sekulow has also started educational programs in international human rights law in Strasbourg, France and at Handong University in South Korea. Jay Sekulow is a graduate of Mercer University, earning both a bachelor\u2019s degree and doctor of jurisprudence. Sekulow served on the editorial staff of the Mercer Law Review and graduated cum laude. He later earned a Ph.D. from Regent University, writing his dissertation on American Legal History. Jay Sekulow also serves on the Board of Trustees for The Supreme Court Historical Society in Washington, D.C. Jay Sekulow, ACLJ Chief Counsels full biography and video. Jay Sekulow on Facebook. Jay Sekulow on Twitter. Jay Sekulow on YouTube.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/author\/jay_sekulow"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/401"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1542"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1542\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1724,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1542\/revisions\/1724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/faithandjustice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}