{"id":401,"date":"2009-07-20T07:18:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-20T07:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html"},"modified":"2009-07-20T07:18:00","modified_gmt":"2009-07-20T07:18:00","slug":"oregons-fashion-police-religious-division","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html","title":{"rendered":"Oregon&#8217;s fashion police (religious division)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m not sure what implications <a href=\"http:\/\/newsweek.washingtonpost.com\/onfaith\/undergod\/2009\/07\/oregons_fashion_police.html?hpid=talkbox1\">this<\/a> might have for Catholics, but it&#8217;s a disturbing prospect nonetheless: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p> Should your child&#8217;s teacher wear a turban, a hijab, a kippah or other &#8220;religious dress&#8217;? The state of Oregon doesn&#8217;t think so. The Oregon Workplace Religious Freedom Act, now awaiting the governor&#8217;s signature, requires all employers to let workers wear religious items with one exception: &#8220;No teacher in any public school shall wear any religious dress while engaged in the performance of duties as a teacher.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The proposed law has set up a classic religious liberty battle between the First Amendment&#8217;s Establishment clause, which tells government not to favor (or disfavor) one religion over another, and the Free Exercise clause, which tells government to leave the religious alone. The new law also reflects the increasing difficulty of accommodating a widening variety of religious faiths in a pluralistic society.<\/p>\n<p>Organizations representing Sikhs and Muslims claim the new law would unconstitutionally limits their religious freedom. They are asking Gov. Ted Kulongoski to veto the bill. &#8220;In effect,&#8221; argues the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund, &#8220;observant Sikh Americans would still be barred from working as teachers in the public schools of Oregon because of their religiously-mandated dastaars (turbans), and observant Jews and Muslims would also be subjected to the ignominy of having to choose between religious freedom and a teaching career in the State of Oregon.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But Oregon&#8217;s Department of Education argues that public schools are obligated to maintain religious neutrality: &#8220;The underlying policy reflects the unique position that teachers occupy,&#8221; spokesman Jake Weigler told the Oregonian. &#8220;In this case, the concern that a public school teacher would be imparting religious values to their students outweighs that teacher&#8217;s right to free expression.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Not quite, argues the Council on American-Islamic Relations: &#8220;Those who wear religiously-mandated attire are not proselytizing; they are practicing their faith, a right guaranteed by the Constitution. Concerns about religious neutrality in schools can be adequately addressed through professional codes of conduct,&#8221; spokesman Ibrahim Hooper says in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>Oregon already bans teachers from wearing &#8220;religious dress.&#8221; The new law allows other workers to wear religious items while maintaining the ban for teachers only. The Oregon ban was tested in the 1980s when a Sikh teacher was suspended for wearing a white turban and white clothes to class. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <a href=\"http:\/\/newsweek.washingtonpost.com\/onfaith\/undergod\/2009\/07\/oregons_fashion_police.html?hpid=talkbox1\">Read on<\/a> for more details.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m not sure what implications this might have for Catholics, but it&#8217;s a disturbing prospect nonetheless: Should your child&#8217;s teacher wear a turban, a hijab, a kippah or other &#8220;religious dress&#8217;? The state of Oregon doesn&#8217;t think so. The Oregon Workplace Religious Freedom Act, now awaiting the governor&#8217;s signature, requires all employers to let workers&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":365,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-401","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ripped-from-the-headlines"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Oregon&#039;s fashion police (religious division) - The Deacon&#039;s Bench<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Oregon&#039;s fashion police (religious division) - The Deacon&#039;s Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I&#8217;m not sure what implications this might have for Catholics, but it&#8217;s a disturbing prospect nonetheless: Should your child&#8217;s teacher wear a turban, a hijab, a kippah or other &#8220;religious dress&#8217;? The state of Oregon doesn&#8217;t think so. The Oregon Workplace Religious Freedom Act, now awaiting the governor&#8217;s signature, requires all employers to let workers&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Deacon&#039;s Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-20T07:18:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"deacon greg kandra\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Oregon's fashion police (religious division) - The Deacon&#039;s Bench","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Oregon's fashion police (religious division) - The Deacon&#039;s Bench","og_description":"I&#8217;m not sure what implications this might have for Catholics, but it&#8217;s a disturbing prospect nonetheless: Should your child&#8217;s teacher wear a turban, a hijab, a kippah or other &#8220;religious dress&#8217;? The state of Oregon doesn&#8217;t think so. The Oregon Workplace Religious Freedom Act, now awaiting the governor&#8217;s signature, requires all employers to let workers&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html","og_site_name":"The Deacon&#039;s Bench","article_published_time":"2009-07-20T07:18:00+00:00","author":"deacon greg kandra","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html","name":"Oregon's fashion police (religious division) - The Deacon&#039;s Bench","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-20T07:18:00+00:00","dateModified":"2009-07-20T07:18:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#\/schema\/person\/052b8cd86cc713feaccdc8282b03cf10"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2009\/07\/oregons-fashion-police-religious-division.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Oregon&#8217;s fashion police (religious division)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/","name":"The Deacon&#039;s Bench","description":"Where a Roman Catholic Deacon Ponders the World","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#\/schema\/person\/052b8cd86cc713feaccdc8282b03cf10","name":"deacon greg kandra","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/a4e\/a4e07ce6fde3f10d4d9753243fd48d45x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/a4e\/a4e07ce6fde3f10d4d9753243fd48d45x96.jpg","caption":"deacon greg kandra"},"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/author\/deacon-greg-kandra"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/365"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=401"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/401\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}