{"id":2890,"date":"2008-09-05T14:17:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-05T14:17:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html"},"modified":"2008-09-05T14:17:00","modified_gmt":"2008-09-05T14:17:00","slug":"mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Mrs.&#8221; Clinton and &#8220;Ms.&#8221; Palin"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/theanchoressonline.com\/\">The Anchoress<\/a> dropped me a line a few minutes ago and said a reader was wondering why the New York Times refers to these women differently.   <\/p>\n<p>I know the Times has a tradition of always using an honorific &#8212; Mr., Mrs., whatever &#8212; which is very old-fashioned and, I think, nice.  But I was stumped about this particular choice.  (Here at CBS News, we get heat all the time for using &#8220;President&#8221; on the first reference of the Commander in Chief, and &#8220;Mr.&#8221; for subsequent references.  Some people find it insulting that we only call him &#8220;Mr.&#8221;  But we&#8217;re one of the few news organizations that reserves a title for the President, and only the President, or former President, as a sign of respect.  The other TV networks use just his last name, so he&#8217;s &#8220;Bush&#8221; instead of &#8220;Mr. Bush.&#8221;) <\/p>\n<p>Anyway&#8230;I did a little searching at the Times and found <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/10\/29\/business\/media\/29asktheeditors.html?pagewanted=all\">this explanation<\/a> for the Mrs.\/Ms. conflict.  It comes from Philip Corbett, one of their news editors: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>  Our style is to use &#8220;Ms.&#8221; unless a woman chooses to use &#8220;Mrs.&#8221; or &#8220;Miss.&#8221; That rule applies both to private individuals and to public figures.<\/p>\n<p>Aside from these inquiries about &#8220;Ms.,&#8221; I&#8217;ve been surprised not to get more questions about our use of courtesy titles. After all, our continued insistence on Mr., Ms., Dr., etc., is perhaps our most obvious stylistic difference from other news organizations, which generally use bare surnames for second references to people. The Times&#8217;s style seems strange, at first, to every reporter or editor coming here from another paper.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t know whether the lack of comment in this forum reflects approval of the courtesy titles, or just familiarity or apathy. I do hear occasionally from reporters who&#8217;d like to drop them. Most recently, when we reduced the width of our pages, several people suggested eliminating courtesy titles to save space (it wouldn&#8217;t really help).<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m tradition-bound, but this is one quirk of Times style that I would go to some lengths to defend. We strive for a tone that is literate, civil and serious: not fussy or old-fashioned, but also not chatty or self-consciously hip. It&#8217;s not an easy balance, and we don&#8217;t always get it right. But I think the simple use of courtesy titles \u2014 whether it&#8217;s &#8220;Mr. Bush,&#8221; &#8220;Mrs. Clinton&#8221; or &#8220;Ms. Rivera, a teacher from Queens&#8221; \u2014 injects a note of thoughtfulness and civility into our pages. Amid the daily cacophony, that seems a worthy effort.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> Presumably, then, if &#8220;Ms. Palin&#8221; would rather be known as &#8220;Mrs. Palin,&#8221; she&#8217;ll drop the Times a note and they&#8217;ll change it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Anchoress dropped me a line a few minutes ago and said a reader was wondering why the New York Times refers to these women differently. I know the Times has a tradition of always using an honorific &#8212; Mr., Mrs., whatever &#8212; which is very old-fashioned and, I think, nice. But I was stumped&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":204,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-my-world"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>&quot;Mrs.&quot; Clinton and &quot;Ms.&quot; Palin - The Deacon&#039;s Bench<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"&quot;Mrs.&quot; Clinton and &quot;Ms.&quot; Palin - The Deacon&#039;s Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Anchoress dropped me a line a few minutes ago and said a reader was wondering why the New York Times refers to these women differently. I know the Times has a tradition of always using an honorific &#8212; Mr., Mrs., whatever &#8212; which is very old-fashioned and, I think, nice. But I was stumped&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Deacon&#039;s Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-05T14:17:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Deacon Greg Kandra\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"Mrs.\" Clinton and \"Ms.\" Palin - The Deacon&#039;s Bench","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"Mrs.\" Clinton and \"Ms.\" Palin - The Deacon&#039;s Bench","og_description":"The Anchoress dropped me a line a few minutes ago and said a reader was wondering why the New York Times refers to these women differently. I know the Times has a tradition of always using an honorific &#8212; Mr., Mrs., whatever &#8212; which is very old-fashioned and, I think, nice. But I was stumped&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html","og_site_name":"The Deacon&#039;s Bench","article_published_time":"2008-09-05T14:17:00+00:00","author":"Deacon Greg Kandra","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html","name":"\"Mrs.\" Clinton and \"Ms.\" Palin - The Deacon&#039;s Bench","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-05T14:17:00+00:00","dateModified":"2008-09-05T14:17:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#\/schema\/person\/5a7b3c6e9d155e382842aa310ff9b1ee"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/2008\/09\/mrs-clinton-and-ms-palin.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"&#8220;Mrs.&#8221; Clinton and &#8220;Ms.&#8221; Palin"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/","name":"The Deacon&#039;s Bench","description":"Where a Roman Catholic Deacon Ponders the World","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#\/schema\/person\/5a7b3c6e9d155e382842aa310ff9b1ee","name":"Deacon Greg Kandra","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/114\/1144d939be636f641ea021e1d347f9fdx96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/114\/1144d939be636f641ea021e1d347f9fdx96.jpg","caption":"Deacon Greg Kandra"},"description":"A Roman Catholic deacon serving the Diocese of Brooklyn, New York, Greg Kandra is News Director for the diocese's cable channel, NET (New Evangelization Television.) Prior to that, Deacon Greg worked for 26 years as a writer and producer for CBS News, where he contributed to \"The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric,\" \"60 Minutes II,\" \"48 Hours,\" (Emmy Award, Writers Guild of America Award) and \"Sunday Morning.\" He was co-writer for the acclaimed documentary \"9\/11,\" hosted by Robert DeNiro. (Emmy Award, Christopher Award, Peabody Award, Writers Guild of America Award.) His radio essays were featured in the bestselling book \"Deadlines and Datelines\" by Dan Rather. He's also a two-time winner of the Catholic Press Association Award. Other places you may find him: AMERICA, U.S. CATHOLIC, CATHOLIC DIGEST, REALITY (Redemptorist Communications) and THE BROOKLYN TABLET. He also contributes homiletic reflections to the parish resource CONNECT!, published by Liturgical Publications. In November 2009, he began serving a three-year term as a consultant to the Communications Committee of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). Deacon Greg grew up in Maryland (Go Terps!) but he and his wife today live in the beautiful borough of Queens, New York. You can contact Deacon Greg at dcngreg@gmail.com.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/author\/gkandra"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/204"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/deaconsbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}