{"id":33,"date":"2008-09-16T15:59:09","date_gmt":"2008-09-16T15:59:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/cityofbrass\/2008\/09\/sharia-courts-and-domestic-law.html"},"modified":"2008-09-16T15:59:09","modified_gmt":"2008-09-16T15:59:09","slug":"sharia-courts-and-domestic-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/2008\/09\/sharia-courts-and-domestic-law.html","title":{"rendered":"Shari’a courts and domestic law"},"content":{"rendered":"

A can of worms<\/a>, indeed:<\/p>\n

\n

\nISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given
\npowers to rule on Muslim civil cases.\n<\/p>\n

\nThe government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on
\ncases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving
\ndomestic violence.\n<\/p>\n

\nRulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the
\nfull power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.\n<\/p>\n

\nPreviously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and
\ndepended on voluntary compliance among Muslims. <\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

\nUnder the act, the sharia courts are classified as arbitration tribunals. The
\nrulings of arbitration tribunals are binding in law, provided that both
\nparties in the dispute agree to give it the power to rule on their case.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This is one of those issues that are subtle and complex. On one hand, the idea that a minority can employ a parallel system for arbitration of disputes is not unique to British muslims – Jewish Beth Din courts<\/a> have operated for over a century in Britain and also are used to resolve civil disputes. A good article at the BBC<\/a> gives some context:<\/p>\n

\n

\nThe Beth Din is the most formally entrenched of these
\nminority courts. The UK’s main Beth Din is based in Finchley, north
\nLondon. <\/font><\/p>\n

\nIt oversees a wide range of cases including divorce settlements, contractual rows between traders and tenancy disputes.
\n<\/font><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\nThe court cannot force anyone to come within its jurisdiction. But once
\nsomeone agrees to settle a dispute in the Beth Din, he or she is bound
\nin English law to abide by the court’s decision. <\/font><\/p>\n

\nThis is because under English law people may devise their own way to settle a dispute before an agreed third party.
\n<\/font><\/p>\n

\nCrucially, the legislation does not insist that
\nsettlements must be based on English law; all that matters is the
\noutcome is reasonable and both parties agree to the process. And it’s
\nin this space that religious courts, applying the laws of another
\nculture, are growing in the UK.
\n<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

For civil matters, the idea of Shari’a tribunals (not “courts” in the strict sense) is a reasonable one. However, the problem is that these courts are also permitted to handle cases of domestic violence, which enters the realm of criminal, not civil, law:<\/p>\n

\n

\nIt has also emerged that tribunal courts have settled six cases of domestic
\nviolence between married couples, working in tandem with the police
\ninvestigations.\n<\/p>\n

\nSiddiqi said he expected the courts to handle a greater number of “smaller”
\ncriminal cases in coming years as more Muslim clients approach them. “All we
\nare doing is regulating community affairs in these cases,” said Siddiqi,
\nchairman of the governing council of the tribunal. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Further, while the Shari’a system in theory must be agreed to by both parties, in matters like domestic violence it is easy to conceive that the weaker party may be coerced into accepting it – and for domestic cases, that’s usually the woman, who is then again disadvantaged in the outcome since Shari’a law favors males in matters of testimony. <\/p>\n

I fully agree with thabet at Talk Islam that the jurisdiction of these Shari’a courts over domestic violence cases is deeply troubling, and requires a clear delineation of the line between civil and criminal matters<\/a>:<\/p>\n

What is probably needed is an expert’s analysis on the line between a
\ncriminal matter (related to domestic violence) and marital issues under
\nconsideration by a Muslim arbitration tribunal, such as those reported
\nby The Times<\/em> (and repeated elsewhere). The erosion of this line is not, and should not, be considered acceptable.<\/strong> Further, as one legal scholar<\/a> has argued, “the
\nstate should seek to apply all human rights and anti-discrimination
\nlegislation rigorously to avoid structural discrimination in the
\noperation of these minority courts of arbitration”<\/a>. Anything less would be an abdication of responsibility by the state.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

What is important here is that the Shari’a tribunals exist solely within a space permitted by English Law. Just as the Arbitration Act provides the foundation for these tribunals’ existence, so too does it provide a basis for their regulation. <\/p>\n

Rod Dreher also noticed this story<\/a>, and categorized it as “dhimmitude” [1] and implies it represents the “decline and fall” of the West. The term dhimmitude gets tossed around rather easily nowadays, but the existence of these tribunals is not any kind of threat to the British system, any more than the Beth Din courts are. Shari’s law is still subordinate to British Law, and only possess authority granted to it. The challenge here is far more mundane than the breathless Clash of Civilizations narratives; it is simply to reconcile tradition with modern values, especially on the gender front. The government must not be swayed by hyperbole about separation of church and state, and act aggressively to ensure that the boundaries of arbitration are clear and firm, as thabet noted. In doing so, the ideal of freedom of religion can coexist with the rule of law, and modern progressive values.<\/p>\n

[1] The word dhimmitude is one of those terms, like crusade or inquisition or reformation, that touches on centuries-old religious fault lines but has very little meaning or applicability in the modern world. Use of these terms serves only to impede honest debate. These are dangerous words because their purpose is to inflame rather than inform.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A can of worms, indeed: ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases. The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":165,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[83,85,84],"class_list":["post-33","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-gash-of-civilizations","tag-dhimmitude","tag-sharia","tag-uk"],"yoast_head":"\nShari'a courts and domestic law - City of Brass<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shari'a courts and domestic law - City of Brass\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A can of worms, indeed: ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases. The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/2008\/09\/sharia-courts-and-domestic-law.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"City of Brass\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-16T15:59:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aziz Poonawalla\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shari'a courts and domestic law - City of Brass","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shari'a courts and domestic law - City of Brass","og_description":"A can of worms, indeed: ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases. The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/2008\/09\/sharia-courts-and-domestic-law.html","og_site_name":"City of Brass","article_published_time":"2008-09-16T15:59:09+00:00","author":"Aziz Poonawalla","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/2008\/09\/sharia-courts-and-domestic-law.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/2008\/09\/sharia-courts-and-domestic-law.html","name":"Shari'a courts and domestic law - City of Brass","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-16T15:59:09+00:00","dateModified":"2008-09-16T15:59:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/#\/schema\/person\/87dfd5533a0222456bb5ad6eaf152fbb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/2008\/09\/sharia-courts-and-domestic-law.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/2008\/09\/sharia-courts-and-domestic-law.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/2008\/09\/sharia-courts-and-domestic-law.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shari’a courts and domestic law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/","name":"City of Brass","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Aziz Poonawalla","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/#\/schema\/person\/87dfd5533a0222456bb5ad6eaf152fbb","name":"Aziz Poonawalla","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/a95\/a95f814e7f2984c887f3b03aed357433x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/a95\/a95f814e7f2984c887f3b03aed357433x96.jpg","caption":"Aziz Poonawalla"},"description":"Aziz Poonawalla is a member of the Dawoodi Bohra Muslim community, and currently lives in Los Angeles with his wife and two children. City of Brass is his weblog, which was founded in 2002 under the name UNMEDIA. He is a co-founder of the annual Brass Crescent Awards. The name City of Brass refers to the Story of the City of Brass in the Thousand and One Nights, and the poem by Rudyard Kipling of the same name: Here was a people whom, after their works, thou shalt see wept over for their lost dominion; And in this palace is the last information respecting lords collected in the dust. -- Thousand and One Nights, Story of the City of Brass IN A land that the sand overlays, the ways to her gates are untrod, A multitude ended their days whose fates were made splendid by God, Till they grew drunk and were smitten with madness and went to their fall, And of these is a story written: but Allah Alone knoweth all! -- Rudyard Kipling, The City of Brass (1909)"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/165"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/cityofbrass\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}