{"id":134,"date":"2010-12-16T09:27:12","date_gmt":"2010-12-16T09:27:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html"},"modified":"2010-12-16T09:27:12","modified_gmt":"2010-12-16T09:27:12","slug":"is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html","title":{"rendered":"Is The Smithsonian’s decision to pull a controversial “art” video censorship?"},"content":{"rendered":"

There’s lots of outrage on the left over the Smithsonian’s decision to bow to political pressure<\/a> and pull a video of Jesus Christ covered in ants from a Christmas-timed exhibit entitled “Hide\/Seek: Difference
\nand Desire in American Portraiture”<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Predictably, the cries of government censorship followed. One commenter to an item that appeared on this blog<\/a> wrote:   <\/p>\n

Mr. Kennedy,
\nIt’s reassuring to see that you as a Catholic uphold Catholic
\ntradition. The National Socialists (mostly good Catholics) banned works
\nof art as degenerate to the approval of Germany’s Catholics. It
\nreaffirms my world view that you would applaud the banning of nine of
\nthe same works again by Herr Senator Boehner.
\nIt’s nice to know somethings never change.
\nHeil Ratzinger.<\/p>\n

Frank<\/p>\n

p.s. The most degenerate piece of art in the exhibition was that short
\nfilm that had the theme that the suffering of Christ enabled Him to
\nshare in the humanity of AIDS carriers and homosexual degenerates. What
\ncan the Aryan Christ WE worship have to do with such race criminals?<\/i>
<\/i>
Where to begin. First Frank implies some sort of linkage between the Catholic Church and Hitler. No doubt there were anti-Semitic Catholics in the Germany of that era and anti-Semitism is always shameful. But the Catholic Church as an institution (under the leadership of Pope Pius XII) opposed the Nazis and their treatment of the Jewish population.<\/p>\n

From The New American<\/a> (quoting Rabbi David G. Dalin<\/a>, author of  T<\/a>he Myth of Hitler’s Pope<\/a><\/i>):<\/p>\n

Throughout World War II, he [Pius] spoke out on behalf of Europe’s Jews. When
\nPius learned of the Nazi atrocities in Poland, he urged the bishops of Europe to
\ndo all they could to save the Jews and other victims of Nazi persecution. On
\nJanuary 19, 1940, at the Pope’s instruction, Vatican radio and L’Osservatore
\nRomano revealed to the world “the dreadful cruelties of uncivilized tyranny”
\nthat the Nazis were inflicting on Jewish and Catholic Poles.  <\/p>\n

… In
\nJune 1942, Pius spoke out against the mass deportation of Jews from
\nNazi-occupied France, further instructing his Papal Nuncio in Paris to protest
\nto Marshal Henri Petain, Vichy France’s Chief of State, against “the inhuman
\narrests and deportations of Jews from the French occupied zone to Silesia and
\nparts of Russia.”  <\/p>\n

The London Times of October 1, 1942, explicitly
\npraises him for his condemnation of Nazism and his public support for the Jewish
\nvictims of Nazi terror. “A study of the words which Pope Pius XII has addressed
\nsince his accession,” noted the Times, “leaves no room for doubt.  He condemns
\nthe worship of force and its concrete manifestations in the suppression of
\nnational liberties and in the persecution of the Jewish race.”  <\/p>\n

Pius
\nXII’s Christmas addresses of 1941 and 1942, broadcast over Vatican radio to
\nmillions throughout the world, also help to refute the fallacious claim that
\nPope Pius was “silent.” Indeed, as The New York Times described Pius’ 1941
\nChristmas address in its editorial the following day, it specifically applauded
\nthe Pope, as a “lonely” voice of public protest against Hitler…. The Pope’s
\nChristmas message of 1941, as reported by The New York Times and other
\nnewspapers, was understood at the time to be a clear condemnation of Nazi
\nattacks on Europe’s Jews.<\/i><\/p>\n

So, it would be nice if these subjects could be debated on the issues at hand and not by carting out unfair insinuations about the Church and Catholics as a whole.<\/p>\n

And, the issue, as Frank sees it, apparently concerns government banning of art. Well, I’m with him on that point. I don’t want to see the government banning art (or any form of free speech) either — including art that offends Christians.  I just don’t agree that that is what is being done here. <\/p>\n

While the exhibit itself has private sponsorship, it is being held in a tax-payer funded institution. What the Smithsonian decides to host and not host is a matter of taste and judgment, not censorship.  If the institution hosted a reverential exhibit entitled “Christmas: Christ is the Lord” I’m guessing that many of the same people who are now fretting over censorship would be urging that the plug be pulled on that one.<\/p>\n

Also, if government institutions are not allowed to exercise such judgment, would the Smithsonian be required to host a racist or anti-gay exhibit simply because it obtained outside sponsorship?<\/p>\n

Finally, Frank asserts that the “art” (which, of course, is in the eye of the beholder) depicts how “the suffering of Christ enabled Him to
\nshare in the humanity of AIDS carriers.”<\/p>\n

<\/i>Well, I don’t know the actual motivation of the artist but I can’t help but think there are other ways of depicting Christ’s compassion for AIDS sufferers — ways that would actually draw Christians toward greater understanding and empathy for the disease’s victims. Could the artist really have been surprised that many Christians would find this portrayal offensive? And, if offense was the point, I have to ask what purpose that serves.  <\/p>\n

I would certainly hope that, if the artist sought to depict Mohammed’s compassion toward AIDS victims, he would find a means of doing so that would be more sensitive to the feelings of Muslims.<\/p>\n

Offense for offense sake does not tend to lead to understanding.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There’s lots of outrage on the left over the Smithsonian’s decision to bow to political pressure and pull a video of Jesus Christ covered in ants from a Christmas-timed exhibit entitled “Hide\/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture”. Predictably, the cries of government censorship followed. One commenter to an item that appeared on this blog…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":225,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,3,12,5,24,14,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-art","category-catholic-church","category-christianity","category-current-events","category-politics","category-pope-benedict-xvi","category-vatican"],"yoast_head":"\nIs The Smithsonian's decision to pull a controversial "art" video censorship? - Catholics Media and Culture<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is The Smithsonian's decision to pull a controversial "art" video censorship? - Catholics Media and Culture\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"There’s lots of outrage on the left over the Smithsonian’s decision to bow to political pressure and pull a video of Jesus Christ covered in ants from a Christmas-timed exhibit entitled “Hide\/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture”. Predictably, the cries of government censorship followed. One commenter to an item that appeared on this blog…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Catholics Media and Culture\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-16T09:27:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John W. Kennedy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is The Smithsonian's decision to pull a controversial \"art\" video censorship? - Catholics Media and Culture","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is The Smithsonian's decision to pull a controversial \"art\" video censorship? - Catholics Media and Culture","og_description":"There’s lots of outrage on the left over the Smithsonian’s decision to bow to political pressure and pull a video of Jesus Christ covered in ants from a Christmas-timed exhibit entitled “Hide\/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture”. Predictably, the cries of government censorship followed. One commenter to an item that appeared on this blog…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html","og_site_name":"Catholics Media and Culture","article_published_time":"2010-12-16T09:27:12+00:00","author":"John W. Kennedy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html","name":"Is The Smithsonian's decision to pull a controversial \"art\" video censorship? - Catholics Media and Culture","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-16T09:27:12+00:00","dateModified":"2010-12-16T09:27:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/e5d5ef9caeb6b01bcbf08ca6de6591c2"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/2010\/12\/is-the-smithsonians-decision-to-pull-a-controversial-art-video-censorship.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is The Smithsonian’s decision to pull a controversial “art” video censorship?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/","name":"Catholics Media and Culture","description":"Catholic Church News and More","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/e5d5ef9caeb6b01bcbf08ca6de6591c2","name":"John W. Kennedy","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/d80\/d801bc09698c0995d9ae402b4b55ab61x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/d80\/d801bc09698c0995d9ae402b4b55ab61x96.jpg","caption":"John W. Kennedy"},"description":"John W. Kennedy is the founder and Dir. of Development of The Creative Universe Entertainment\u2122, a media consultation and development company focusing on the creation, development and support of high-quality mainstream entertainment that upholds positive timeless values, including trust in God. Current projects include \"Bryant Park\" (an uplifting romantic-comedy) and \"Photo Finish\" (an award-winning sci-fi TV pilot). He has written over 100 children's novels based on episodes of the Cartoon Network series \"Ben 10\", \"Ben 10: Alien Force\", \"Ben 10: Ultimate Alien\", \"Ben 10: Omniverse\" and \"Generator Rex\" among others. He also writes Beliefnet\u2019s \"Faith, Media & Culture\" blog. Previously, he has produced successful news and talk programming for CNN, Fox News, Pax TV and SiriusXM. Specialties: Script Writing, Movie\/TV Novelizations & Adaptations, TV Content Creation and Development, Creative Consultation, Producing and Booking News and Talk shows. He can be reached for writing, producing and consulting services at 516-640-1182.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/author\/jkennedy"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/225"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=134"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/catholicsmediaandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}