{"id":10,"date":"2007-07-11T15:37:15","date_gmt":"2007-07-11T15:37:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html"},"modified":"2007-07-11T15:37:15","modified_gmt":"2007-07-11T15:37:15","slug":"by-orson-scott-card-there","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html","title":{"rendered":"Are Any Sincere Christians Expendable?"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Orson Scott Card<\/strong>
\nThere is a sort of comfortableness that can settle in with majoritarians. A complacency that allows one to be picky and exclusive.


\nI remember getting this feeling when I lived in Utah. I moved to the town of Orem, where Mormons were an estimated 98 percent of the population. That should certainly have made me feel at home!


\nHowever, I was also a Democrat, and in Orem, Democrats in 1980 were about as common World Series pennants in the Chicago Cubs clubhouse.


\nSo the local Mormon congregation had no idea what to make of me. I clearly didn’t have a job \u2014 freelance writer? Of science fiction<\/i>? \u2014 and I did something so eccentric as joining the Democratic Party, so how could I possibly be a good member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints?


\nMy opinion was that the two questions were really unrelated \u2014 my identity as a Mormon was, I thought, secure. I kept the commandments. I fulfilled my callings in the Church. And \u2014 here’s the clincher \u2014 I sang tenor in the choir. Good tenors in church choirs are almost as rare as Democrats. I expected to be embraced with open arms.


\nUnfortunately, my ward (congregation) did not have a choir at that time.


\nNor did they have a single calling that they thought I could fulfill.


\nNow, this is one of the peculiarities of Mormonism (which is, after all, the subject of this discussion, yes?): Because we have a lay ministry, every single member is expected to serve in some ministerial role. We teach or supervise or perform other services as part of an official “calling” in the Church.


\nIn fact, that’s much of the way that we create our identity \u2014 by our callings. No matter where we move in the Mormon Church, our congregation will have a “Relief Society president” and many “Primary teachers” and a “ward clerk” and an “executive secretary,” and so on.


\nEven if these people are complete strangers to us, we know who they are in the ward \u2014 the function they fulfill, and what we can expect of them, and even some information about the kind<\/i> of person who is usually given such a calling.


\nBut in my ward in Orem, they couldn’t think of a calling that a science-fiction-writing Democrat could possibly fill.


\nIn their minds, because I was such an unfamiliar creature to them, I couldn’t really be counted as “Mormon.”

<\/p>\n


\nIt happened that my wife (a good Republican) was approached for her fourth \u2014 or was it fifth? \u2014 calling just as she was getting good and sick with the pregnancy that brought us our second child. So as my wife was turning down the calling \u2014 to teach a class of 9-year-olds in which the boys were so rambunctious that they had driven away four teachers in the past few months \u2014 I interrupted the conversation and said, “I’m available.”


\nWell, what could they say? I ended up teaching the class and<\/i> calming down the boys, and we all had a wonderful time.


\nAnd by the time we moved away, the ward had learned something. It was actually possible for a Democrat without a day job who wrote books about space and strange creatures and all \u2014 he could also<\/i> be a good Mormon.


\nWhen I moved to a place where Mormons were more rare, however \u2014 South Bend, Indiana, and then Greensboro, North Carolina, where I live today \u2014 Mormons were much more rare. Baptists, Methodists, and Presbyterians predominated.


\nSo the leadership of all these wards saw me very differently. Because we were not<\/i> in the majority, every Mormon who would faithfully fulfill his callings was valued \u2014 and nobody much cared about my day job or my politics. In fact, I wasn’t the only Democrat, because we hadn’t got the memo about how all good Mormons had to be Republicans out here in the hinterlands.


\nThe result? They’ve had no problem finding callings for me. I’m still considered rather odd, but I have not felt myself to be an outsider; no one has regarded me as “not a good Mormon” because I don’t fit their preconceptions.


\nThis story may seem overly long to some, but it’s absolutely central to the point I’m making.


\nIt happens that I have exactly the same view as Dr. Mohler \u2014 only I apply it differently. I believe that only the Gospel of Jesus Christ can save the souls of those who sin. However, I believe that the only Church that has the authority to act in the name of God and speak for him in the world today is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.


\nBut I also know that far from being in the majority (except in the nation of Tonga), we Mormons, who (in my belief) do<\/i> have that authority and that living gospel of Christ, are usually a tiny minority. It makes it all the more important that we teach the gospel \u2014 openly, to those who care to listen, and also quietly, by trying to live exemplary lives so that, seeing who we are and how we live, others might be moved to join with us and receive the saving grace of Christ that is offered to all who will believe and obey his commandments.


\nThis is exactly what worries Dr. Mohler about Governor Romney: If elected, he might be such a good man, and such a good president, that people might become confused and think that Mormons are actually good Christians<\/i>.


\nSo I can’t disagree with him there: There is a real possibility that if Governor Romney became president, people around the world would look at him and his actions and say, If that man is a Mormon, then maybe I should be a Mormon, too.


\nThat wouldn’t be Gov. Romney’s goal \u2014 his goal would be to serve his nation as best he could. But it might well be a by-product.


\nOf course, if people around the world hated<\/i> him, then the reverse effect could happen, and people would say, If that man’s a Mormon, then keep those missionaries away from my door, I want none of that<\/i>.” That’s also a risk \u2014 and I know Mormons who devoutly wish Gov. Romney were not<\/i> running for president, because they see it as just one more way to bring negative attention down on the Church.


\nBut let’s look at this as dispassionately as we can. None of us can control the impression Romney makes on the rest of the world, or how they extrapolate from him their attitude toward the Mormon Church. Dr. Mohler fears one possible outcome of a Romney presidency; there are Mormons who fear a different one.


\nBut let’s take Dr. Mohler’s worst-case scenario: that President Romney is so universally loved that people all over the world will be moved to follow his example.


\nIf Dr. Mohler is successful in persuading all those people that an admirable Mitt Romney has nothing at all to do with Christianity, then the logical result is that those who admire him will look, not to Christianity in general, but to Mormonism in particular as the sole source of his virtues.


\nOn the other hand, if people perceive this same admirable Mitt Romney as I wish they would \u2014 as a Christian who is trying his best to emulate Christ as he believes the Savior wants him to \u2014 then these admirers of his who were already Christians of whatever denomination might show their admiration for Romney by returning to the Christian church they already attend and trying to live more assiduously the Christian life they have already been taught.


\nIn other words, by differentiating Gov. Romney from Christianity, Dr. Mohler fairly guarantees that anyone who admires Gov. Romney will be led away from Christianity in general, because Christianity will have repudiated him. Only the Mormon Church would benefit from any admiration a President Romney might inspire.


\nSurely this is not what Dr. Mohler intends.


\nBut this is truly a mere speculative argument. If Romney, as president, were despised, then it would be a good thing indeed for Christianity in general if everybody thought of him as a non-Christian!


\nOf course, I see no evidence that the low popularity of our very openly evangelical president Bush has caused any harm to Christianity. Most people have the wit to realize that the actions of a U.S. president may say nothing about the validity or value of the particular religion he belongs to. Or does Rev. Mohler know of some study that indicates that Pres. Bush’s low popularity throughout the world is harming Christian missionary work?


\nIn all likelihood, Rev. Mohler’s worries about a Romney presidency and its effects on Christianity and the salvation of souls are unfounded or contrary \u2014 either Romney would have no influence, or his influence could even be positive toward all Christianity, if only other Christians would let it.
\nBut I think there is a much clearer and more important argument, which does not just involved a particular candidate for the presidency.


\nIt is true that when it comes to teaching the gospel of Jesus Christ, we Mormons are definitely rivals with the evangelical Christian movement. Baptism in one requires a clear rejection of the other interpretation of Christ\u2019s gospel, just as joining either of our Christian traditions means rejecting the Catholic and Orthodox Christian traditions.


\nLet\u2019s not forget, after all, that Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Christians have an even older \u201cmainstream Christian tradition\u201d than any Protestants, and for hundreds of years they were all convinced that Protestants were going to Hell\u2014and causing the damnation of many souls. Since the 1960s, Catholics have been more polite toward Protestants\u2014the word \u201cheretic\u201d is never used anymore (and they long accepted \u201cheretic baptism\u201d)\u2014but the pope recently reaffirmed that while the Orthodox churches are to be regarded as \u201capostolic\u201d with a defect, Protestant churches simply don\u2019t have the apostolic authority.


\nAnd to hard-line Catholics, any distinction between Mormons and Baptists is pretty trivial\u2014we\u2019re all pope-disdaining, saint-ignoring, transubstantiation-denying distractions from the true Christian message.


\nHave we forgotten, too, that American Protestants have a long tradition of denying Catholics the status of Christians? Magnanimously, for purposes of our discussion here, Dr. Mohler is willing to admit that Catholics are Christians … at least compared to Mormons. He recognizes\u2014no, he asserts\u2014that his movement is part of the ancient Christian tradition, despite the long anti-papist tradition of the Baptist Church.


\nI submit that tolerance of other views of Christianity is a matter of perspective and situation.


\nWhen we Mormons, with the huge sums of money and supplies we raise for welfare work, needed to have help in getting it to the suffering people who needed it in places where our own church had no infrastructure, we turned to Catholic relief agencies and asked them to help us in our Christian mission.


\nI imagine that this caused some soul-searching among the Catholics involved, but they reached the conclusion that in the Christian goal of helping the poor, regardless of faith, surely our Mormon offerings must be acceptable to Christ, and should not be turned away just because they believe our doctrines about Christ to be horribly wrong-headed.


\nBecause they realized that we did agree, definitely, on the simple truth of this<\/i> scriptural statement: “Even as ye have done it unto the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.”


\nSo the Catholic relief agencies accepted the offerings of the Mormons and helped us distribute them because they knew it would be unChristlike to refuse to let the poor receive help, just because that help came from Christians with incorrect opinions about God.


\nThere was an era when interdenominational rivalry would have trumped Christianity \u2014 but we were happy indeed that when it came to helping the poor, that era has passed, at least between the Catholic and Mormon churches.


\nThere was a time \u2014 and not long ago \u2014 when we Mormons had a chip on our shoulders and began all our teachings by proclaiming the falseness of all other Christian churches. But we grew up. We realized that in most nations of the world, we aren’t teaching other Christians, we’re teaching people who have never heard the name of Christ.


\nWhat do they<\/i> care whether we have the best Christian church \u2014 what they need is to hear of Christ at all<\/i>. And to begin our teaching by telling them what’s wrong with wrong people is simply…wrong.


\nRight now, Mormons are as unwelcome among evangelical Christians as I, a science-fiction-writing Democratic Mormon was unwelcome among Republican normal-job-holding Mormons in Utah.


\nBut that’s because evangelicals have a majoritarian attitude that is really not appropriate any more.


\nAmerica is the most religious Western nation \u2014 but surely Dr. Mohler sees that our children can hardly get a college degree without being indoctrinated, not just in atheism, but in hostility to all organized religions, Christianity in particular.


\nWhen professors tell our children that all religions are outmoded, that Christianity belongs in the dustbin of history, that all evils in history have been caused by fanatical believers in some religion \u2014 do you think it matters to them<\/i> whether the religion they’re rejecting is Orthodox Judaism, evangelical Christianity, Catholicism, or Mormonism?


\nAnd when Islamist terrorists seek the overthrow of all secular governments and the establishment of Sharia and the downfall of all competing religions, do you think they’ll care even a tiny bit whether the church they throw down or the crowd they blow up consists of official, traditional Christians or those weird Mormons?


\nThe message of Christ is today proclaimed into the ears of an increasingly hostile world. Whether from jihadist Islam or jihadist atheism, we are beleaguered on all sides and none<\/i> of us has the majority.


\nInstead of “mainstream Christianity” seeking opportunities to shun and exclude and deny the Christianity of Mormons, it might be more helpful for us to admit our irreconcilable differences but then recognize that in this world, today, right now, we can gain more for the cause of Christ by treating each other with respect and honoring each other for the degree to which we do<\/i> live up to his teachings.


\nReturning to the example of Gov. Romney, I wonder if there is a Christian denomination on earth that would not be proud to claim as a member of their church a man who is so faithful to his wife and devoted to his children, so abstemious in his personal habits, so consonant to his expressed ideals?


\nWouldn’t evangelical Christianity be best served, not by proclaiming, “That man is no Christian!” but rather by proclaiming, “We may not agree with all his beliefs, but Christians should all try to live their understanding of Christ’s teachings as well and thoroughly as he does!”


\nShouldn’t all Christians be saying, “Take Governor Romney as an example of effectiveness in the world without sacrifice of faith and religious ideals!”?


\nIt is true that we Mormons do not accept the way the doctrines of Christianity evolved, under the influence of neoplatonic philosophy after the death of the Apostles. We reject that tradition and believe it has been wrongish and getting wronger from about the middle of the second century A.D. onward.


\nBut we accept every word of Christ in the New Testament. We teach our members to live up to the commandments \u2014 and we work from pretty much the same list of commandments as the Baptists, with the major exception being that we dance.
\nWhen Christianity is once again seen \u2014 correctly, I might add \u2014 as the nurturing mother of democracy and freedom throughout the world, as the great teacher that made humanism in all its forms not only possible but the ideal that most decent people aspire to \u2014 then perhaps we can afford to squabble amongst ourselves about who is really Christian and who is not.


\nRight now, Dr. Mohler is as uncomfortable with my insistence that we Mormons are Christians as a Vatican theologian would be with Dr. Mohler”s insistence that his<\/i> denomination is part of the ancient Christian tradition.


\nBut just as the Catholic Church has accepted Mormon help in serving the poor in the name of Christ, and just as ordinary Republican Mormons have found it in their hearts to accept me, a Democrat, as if I might be a real Mormon all the same, I wish Dr. Mohler would take the tiny, tiny step of saying, not that Mormons are right<\/i>, but that a person can believe as a Mormon does and still do good works in the name of Christ, that would be acceptable to Christ by that clear, bright standard:


\nEven as ye have done it unto the least of these, my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Orson Scott Card There is a sort of comfortableness that can settle in with majoritarians. A complacency that allows one to be picky and exclusive. I remember getting this feeling when I lived in Utah. I moved to the town of Orem, where Mormons were an estimated 98 percent of the population. That should…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":47,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-are-mormons-christian"],"yoast_head":"\nAre Any Sincere Christians Expendable? - Blogalogue<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Are Any Sincere Christians Expendable? - Blogalogue\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Orson Scott Card There is a sort of comfortableness that can settle in with majoritarians. A complacency that allows one to be picky and exclusive. I remember getting this feeling when I lived in Utah. I moved to the town of Orem, where Mormons were an estimated 98 percent of the population. That should…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Blogalogue\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-07-11T15:37:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"prothfuss\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Are Any Sincere Christians Expendable? - Blogalogue","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Are Any Sincere Christians Expendable? - Blogalogue","og_description":"By Orson Scott Card There is a sort of comfortableness that can settle in with majoritarians. A complacency that allows one to be picky and exclusive. I remember getting this feeling when I lived in Utah. I moved to the town of Orem, where Mormons were an estimated 98 percent of the population. That should…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html","og_site_name":"Blogalogue","article_published_time":"2007-07-11T15:37:15+00:00","author":"prothfuss","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html","name":"Are Any Sincere Christians Expendable? - Blogalogue","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-07-11T15:37:15+00:00","dateModified":"2007-07-11T15:37:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/#\/schema\/person\/3c8775a31b49ebc7036eaf7f92829115"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/2007\/07\/by-orson-scott-card-there.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Are Any Sincere Christians Expendable?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/","name":"Blogalogue","description":"Debates About Faith","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/#\/schema\/person\/3c8775a31b49ebc7036eaf7f92829115","name":"prothfuss","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/8b6\/8b67d3e576b12bdb6a322e49ec7bb959x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/8b6\/8b67d3e576b12bdb6a322e49ec7bb959x96.jpg","caption":"prothfuss"},"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/author\/prothfuss"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/47"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/blogalogue\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}