Even had Republicans won the much coveted Hispanic vote in November, Mitt Romney still would have lost.<\/p>\n
Thus declares Byron York while writing in the Washington Examiner last week.<\/p>\n
Using a New York Times\u2019 calculator devised by Nate Silver, York reports that even if Romney \u201chad been able to make history and attract 50 percent of Hispanic voters,\u201d he \u201cstill would have been beaten, 283 electoral votes to 255.\u201d\u00a0 And had he \u201cbeen able to do something absolutely astonishing for a Republican and win 60 percent of the Hispanic vote,\u201d he \u201cwould have lost by the same margin, 283 electoral votes to 255.\u201d<\/p>\n
To show just how wide of the mark is the conventional wisdom on the GOP\u2019s need for Hispanics, York reveals that even had Romney \u201cbeen able to reach a mind-blowing 70 percent of the Hispanic vote,\u201d he \u201cstill would have lost [.]\u201d\u00a0 In such a situation, Romney would have won the popular vote while losing the Electoral College, 270-268.<\/p>\n
York informs us that Romney would have had to increase his share of the Hispanic vote from the paltry 27 percent that he actually received to a whopping 73 percent to have won in 2012.\u00a0 Obviously, York concludes, \u201cRomney, and Republicans, had bigger problems than Hispanic voters.\u201d<\/p>\n
Indeed.\u00a0 Some of us have known all of this for quite some time.\u00a0 We also have known what York tells us next:<\/p>\n
\u201cThe most serious\u201d of Republicans\u2019 problems \u201cwas that Romney was not able to connect with white voters who were so turned off by the campaign that they abandoned the GOP and in many cases stayed away from the polls altogether.\u201d<\/p>\n
Romney, like McCain before him, failed to resonate with white voters.<\/p>\n
And judging from the number of whites who decided to either sit out the election or throw in behind Obama or some third party candidate, this failure to connect was huge. \u201cRecent reports,\u201d York relays, \u201csuggest [that] as many as 5 million white voters simply stayed home on Election Day.\u201d What exactly does this mean?\u00a0 Well, if whites \u201chad voted at the same rate [that] they did in 2004, even with the demographic changes since then, Romney would have won.\u201d<\/p>\n
York adds that \u201cthe white vote is so large that an improvement of 4 points\u2026would have won the race for Romney.\u201d<\/p>\n
Given all of this, York facetiously asks: \u201cSo which would have been a more realistic goal for Romney\u2014matching the white turnout from just a few years earlier, or winning 73 percent of Hispanic voters?\u201d<\/p>\n
York asserts that if 2012 voting patterns remain constant\u2014\u201cwhites voting in lower numbers but about 60 percent for Republicans, blacks and Asians turning out in large numbers and voting 90 percent and 70 percent, respectively, for Democrats\u201d\u2014then \u201cRepublicans will have to win an astonishingly high percentage of the Hispanic vote to capture the White House.\u201d<\/p>\n
York then proceeds to debunk the conventional wisdom among Republican politicians and pundits as the conventional folly that it is. \u201cIt is simply not reasonable,\u201d he states, \u201cto believe that there is something the GOP can do\u2014pass immigration reform, juice up voter-outreach efforts\u2014that will create that result.\u201d<\/p>\n
So, what must the GOP do?<\/p>\n
The bulk of York\u2019s piece has all but spelled out the answer to this question: appeal to the millions of disenchanted whites who feel that their interests have been neglected by both national parties.\u00a0 Yet even now, and in spite of all that he has written, York still tries to avoid being racially explicit.\u00a0 Instead, he writes of the need for Republicans to reach \u201cthe millions of Americans who have seen their standard of living decline over the past decades,\u201d those to whom Romney failed to appeal.\u00a0 The next Republican presidential candidate who can do this, he is convinced, will win.<\/p>\n
York is to be commended for daring to speak a truth that far too many try at all costs to deny.\u00a0 And he is certainly correct when he concludes his article with the reminder that reaching those millions of Americans who otherwise feel betrayed or ignored by Republicans \u201cwould do more than any immigration bill or outreach program ever could.\u201d<\/p>\n
But neither York nor any other Republican can afford to be afraid to say that it is reaching millions of white <\/i>voters that will guarantee the GOP future electoral victories.\u00a0 Nor should they ignore the fact that these same whites do not live by bread alone. It isn\u2019t just material concerns that motivate them, but the sense, the conviction, that political and cultural elites have silently declared a kind of cold war against them: they are the only group that is not supposed to have legitimate interests.<\/p>\n
Until Republicans come to terms with this reality, white voter turn-out will remain low.<\/p>\n
And Republicans will remain losers.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Even had Republicans won the much coveted Hispanic vote in November, Mitt Romney still would have lost. Thus declares Byron York while writing in the Washington Examiner last week. Using a New York Times\u2019 calculator devised by Nate Silver, York reports that even if Romney \u201chad been able to make history and attract 50 percent…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":399,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n