{"id":794,"date":"2013-03-22T21:19:07","date_gmt":"2013-03-23T01:19:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/?p=794"},"modified":"2013-03-22T21:19:07","modified_gmt":"2013-03-23T01:19:07","slug":"richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html","title":{"rendered":"Richard Dawkins and the Amateur Philosopher Syndrome (APS)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Richard Dawkins is a scientist who is apparently either extraordinarily bored with his discipline, or hopelessly oblivious to its limits.<\/p>\n

From his tireless defenses of atheism to his recent tweet on abortion, Dawkins, you see, spends very little time, it seems, sticking to what he knows.\u00a0 Instead, he is busy away treating his background in science as the supreme credential for making pronouncements on all matters religious and moral. \u00a0<\/p>\n

Dawkins\u2019 is a textbook case of Amateur Philosopher Syndrome (APS)\u2014the delusion that because one is an expert on the physical, one is an expert on the meta<\/em>physical\u2014the stuff that scientists have traditionally left to the philosophers and theologians to study.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Just this past weekend, he got people talking about him after he fired off a tweet regarding abortion in which he said that \u201cany fetus is less human than an adult pig.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

When a biologist, as a biologist, uses the term \u201chuman,\u201d we expect for it to refer to that which is, well, biologically human.\u00a0 A human fetus, then, is obviously more human than a pig, for the latter isn\u2019t human at all.\u00a0 Dawkins, however, uses \u201chuman\u201d here in a moral sense, for he is interested in showing that abortion is permissible. \u201c\u2018Human\u2019 features relevant to the morality of abortion,\u201d he tweets, \u201cinclude [the] ability to feel pain, fear etc & to be mourned by others.\u201d<\/p>\n

To be clear, there is nothing in the least bit scientific or descriptive about Dawkins\u2019 comments on this score.\u00a0 His training in science no more qualifies him to speak to the moral standing of abortion than does a person\u2019s experience as a janitor or a dishwasher endow him with any special authority to do the same.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

And his handling of the abortion issue shows this in spades.<\/p>\n

Dawkins reasons here as if what he\u2019s said hasn\u2019t been said thousands of times over by abortion apologists.\u00a0 Worse, he proceeds as if he was utterly ignorant of the fact that even those philosophers who have used his argument have conceded that it is fraught with pitfalls.\u00a0 This ignorance, though, is a common symptom of APS.<\/p>\n

\u00a0If Dawkins is correct and an entity is human only if it is sentient (able \u201cto feel pain, fear etc.) and \u201cbe mourned by others,\u201d then our duties to pigs, rats, bats, and all sorts of other animals are no different than those that we owe to one another, for all of these are sentient and, in the right contexts, capable of being enjoyed and mourned by others. Furthermore, those members of the human race who are less sensitive to pain than others must thereby be deemed less human than others, and those humans whose sufferings or death fail to elicit the sympathies of their fellows must then be relegated to the ranks of the non-human. \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

This is where Dawkins\u2019 logic leads.\u00a0 But afflicted as he is with APS, Dawkins apparently hasn\u2019t thought it through.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Dawkins\u2019 position on abortion is just as amateurish as his stance on the question of theism, belief in God\u2019s existence.\u00a0 Not unlike most people, Dawkins thinks that science has it within itself to undermine belief in God\u2019s existence. This is probably the one big blunder of which both theist and atheist alike are guilty. \u00a0The reality is that science can no more disprove or prove <\/em>God\u2019s existence than can a painting of the ocean establish the number of gallons that the ocean contains.<\/p>\n

In short, in theory <\/em>science has no bearing on religion, for each speaks to a world separate from the other.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

The world of the scientist is an abstraction.\u00a0 It consists of causes and effects, bodies, structures, processes, material forces, objects and categories of various sorts\u2014e.g. genera and species, etc.\u00a0 By definition, this is a \u201cnatural\u201d\u2014a purely natural\u2014world, a universe that doesn\u2019t allow for any <\/em>intelligence or mind that isn\u2019t ultimately reducible to matter in motion.\u00a0 The methods of science insure this.<\/p>\n

In contrast, the world of religion (and morality) is comprised of, not causes, but reasons; not matter, but mind; not objects, but subjects; not forces and processes, but intentions and purposes.\u00a0 It is a world of believers and unbelievers, moral agents and moral patients, virtues, vices, duties, rights, good and evil.<\/p>\n

In conflating these two worlds into one, Dawkins destroys them both.\u00a0 In bringing morality and religion before the tribunal of science, Dawkins betrays an astonishing ignorance of the characters of morality, religion, and science.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This, though, is exactly what we should expect from one ravaged by Amateur Philosopher Syndrome.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Richard Dawkins is a scientist who is apparently either extraordinarily bored with his discipline, or hopelessly oblivious to its limits. From his tireless defenses of atheism to his recent tweet on abortion, Dawkins, you see, spends very little time, it seems, sticking to what he knows.\u00a0 Instead, he is busy away treating his background in…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":399,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nRichard Dawkins and the Amateur Philosopher Syndrome (APS)<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Richard Dawkins and the Amateur Philosopher Syndrome (APS)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Richard Dawkins is a scientist who is apparently either extraordinarily bored with his discipline, or hopelessly oblivious to its limits. From his tireless defenses of atheism to his recent tweet on abortion, Dawkins, you see, spends very little time, it seems, sticking to what he knows.\u00a0 Instead, he is busy away treating his background in…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-03-23T01:19:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jack Kerwick\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Richard Dawkins and the Amateur Philosopher Syndrome (APS)","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Richard Dawkins and the Amateur Philosopher Syndrome (APS)","og_description":"Richard Dawkins is a scientist who is apparently either extraordinarily bored with his discipline, or hopelessly oblivious to its limits. From his tireless defenses of atheism to his recent tweet on abortion, Dawkins, you see, spends very little time, it seems, sticking to what he knows.\u00a0 Instead, he is busy away treating his background in…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html","og_site_name":"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture","article_published_time":"2013-03-23T01:19:07+00:00","author":"Jack Kerwick","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html","name":"Richard Dawkins and the Amateur Philosopher Syndrome (APS)","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-03-23T01:19:07+00:00","dateModified":"2013-03-23T01:19:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/6832222998cc14717ded1849531201c5"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2013\/03\/richard-dawkins-and-the-amateur-philosopher-syndrome-aps.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Richard Dawkins and the Amateur Philosopher Syndrome (APS)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/","name":"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Jack Kerwick","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/6832222998cc14717ded1849531201c5","name":"Jack Kerwick","description":"I have a Ph.D. in philosophy from Temple University, a master's degree in philosophy from Baylor University, and a bachelor's degree in philosophy and religious studies from Wingate University. I teach philosophy at several colleges in the New Jersey and Pennsylvania areas.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.jackkerwick.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/author\/jkerwick"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/399"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=794"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/794\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":795,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/794\/revisions\/795"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}