Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity have the two most highly rated talk shows in the country.\u00a0 This has been the case for quite some time.\u00a0<\/p>\n
But although Limbaugh and Hannity remain numbers one and two, respectively, their ratings have decreased precipitously during recent months: Limbaugh has lost about a third of his audience while Hannity has lost over a quarter of his.\u00a0<\/p>\n
This phenomenon may be only temporary.\u00a0 On the other hand, it\u2019s possible that the very same fate that befell their leftist counterparts in the \u201cmainstream\u201d during the last few decades is now being visited upon self-avowed \u201cconservatives\u201d in the so-called \u201calternative\u201d media.<\/p>\n
In short, just as the left\u2019s monopoly over the creation and dissemination of the news gave way to the rise of Fox News and talk radio, perhaps the monopoly that Limbaugh and company achieved over \u201cthe alternative media\u201d is now giving way to the internet and satellite radio.\u00a0<\/p>\n
This thesis is more than a bit plausible.<\/p>\n
For a long enough period of time, the Republicans held control of both chambers of Congress and <\/em>the White House.\u00a0 Yet not only did Republicans fail to contract the federal government. They succeeded at expanding <\/em>it: during their tenure the government assumed more domestic and foreign engagements than ever before.<\/p>\n With the exception of some episodic nods of disapproval here and there, however, \u201cconservative\u201d commentators offered nothing in the way of sustained, serious, substantive criticisms.\u00a0 Instead, they continued to pummel the Democratic opposition while transforming every objection to the Republican Party\u2019s aggressive Big Government agenda into an expression of \u201cliberalism.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n The problem is that Limbaugh, Hannity, and most of their colleagues persist in whistling the same tune today.<\/p>\n Admittedly, after <\/em>Republicans suffered devastating losses at the voting booths in 2008, Republican commentators and <\/em>politicians have expressed regret over how their party \u201clost its way\u201d by \u201cbetraying\u201d its \u201cconservative principles.\u201d\u00a0 But beyond such generic issuances, no specific <\/em>apologies or regrets are ever uttered.\u00a0<\/p>\n How<\/em> exactly <\/em>is it that the GOP \u201clost its way?\u201d Who exactly <\/em>\u201cbetrayed\u201d its \u201cconservative principles?\u201d\u00a0 What exactly <\/em>did you <\/em>do to contribute to your party\u2019s reversal of fortunes?\u00a0<\/p>\n These are the questions to which the talking heads of the \u201calternative media\u201d and the politicians for whom they apologize have never provided answers.\u00a0<\/p>\n It isn\u2019t just that talk radio has lost droves of listeners that intrigues.\u00a0 It is the time frame <\/em>within which it is losing listeners that supplies much food for thought.<\/p>\n Barack Obama is a disastrous president.\u00a0 His popularity among Americans fell more precipitously, and more rapidly, than that of any other president in our history.\u00a0 Millions and millions of us believe, along with Rush Limbaugh, that Obama wants nothing more or less than to substitute for the historicalUnited Statesa socialist utopian of his own imagination.\u00a0 So, Obama needs to be defeated as of yesterday.<\/p>\n Within less than a year, the goal of defeating this president could very well come to pass, for the Republicans are in the midst of nominating a candidate who will take the fight to Obama.<\/p>\n One would think that given the convergence of these two events, more <\/em>people than ever before would be availing themselves of \u201cthe alternative media.\u201d\u00a0 Conservatives, neoconservatives, libertarians, independents, \u201cmoderates,\u201d and even disenchanted Democratic liberals\u2014of whom there are many\u2014would regularly consume the latest from the \u201cconservative\u201d voices of the airwaves.\u00a0<\/p>\n So we would think.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n But such is not the case.<\/p>\n It isn\u2019t, of course, that people have reconsidered their all too justified judgments of Obama and his Democrats.\u00a0 Nor is it the case that millions from across the political spectrum aren\u2019t concerned about the outcome of this next election.\u00a0<\/p>\n It is just that more and more people, eager to engage genuinely unfettered voices, are circumventing Big Corporate Media in both of its authorized rightist and leftist varieties in order to drink of the ocean of internet magazines and blogs.\u00a0 There is <\/em>a conservative or anti-leftist media:\u00a0 but it is to be found on-line.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n One step toward regaining some of their lost credibility that Limbaugh, Hannity, and the others can take would be to start treating Ron Paul a bit more respectfully.\u00a0 Paul, along with millions of the most demographically disparate Americans, is defying both the conventional wisdom as well as the two-party system that embodies it.<\/p>\n After that, they should consider abandoning the notion that George W. Bush, a man who, along with his Republican Congress, presided over the largest expansion of the federal government since Lyndon Banes Johnson\u2019s \u201cGreat Society\u201d, was a great \u201cconservative\u201d president.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Jack Kerwick, Ph.D.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity have the two most highly rated talk shows in the country.\u00a0 This has been the case for quite some time.\u00a0 But although Limbaugh and Hannity remain numbers one and two, respectively, their ratings have decreased precipitously during recent months: Limbaugh has lost about a third of his audience while Hannity…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":399,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n