{"id":1928,"date":"2018-10-02T08:53:58","date_gmt":"2018-10-02T12:53:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/?p=1928"},"modified":"2018-10-02T08:53:58","modified_gmt":"2018-10-02T12:53:58","slug":"christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html","title":{"rendered":"Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh: Two Definitions of “Credibility”"},"content":{"rendered":"

To hear numerous GOP and GOP-friendly (\u201cconservative\u201d) commentators tell it, both Christine Ford and <\/em>Brett Kavanaugh are highly \u201ccredible.\u201d<\/p>\n

Of course, none of these pundits claim to believe that Ford was telling the truth<\/em> when she claimed that she was sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh<\/em>.\u00a0 What they claim to believe is that she was indeed sexually abused\u2014but by someone else<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Aristotle, the Father of Western logic, identified numerous fallacies. One of these is the fallacy of equivocation. <\/em><\/p>\n

This is the fallacy of which those of Kavanaugh\u2019s defenders who simultaneously find Ford \u201ccredible\u201d stand convicted.<\/p>\n

Equivocation occurs when an arguer slides from one meaning of a term to another in order to draw the conclusion that he desires.\u00a0 A blatantly obvious example of the fallacy of equivocation is something like this: \u201cJoe is a damn good athlete.\u00a0 Therefore, he must be a damn good human being.\u201d<\/p>\n

Clearly, \u201cgood\u201d means two different things, depending upon whether it is used to describe an athlete or a person.<\/p>\n

Similarly, when Kavanaugh\u2019s Ford-sympathizing defenders assure us that both Ford and Kavanaugh are \u201ccredible,\u201d they are guilty of equivocating upon the word credible.<\/p>\n

Judge Kavanaugh is credible in that he has articulated a preponderance of exculpatory evidence, i.e. good, coherent reasons <\/em>vindicating him of the allegation leveled by Ford. Not only have several dozen people, and several dozen women, including ex-girlfriends from the years during which Ford claims he assaulted her, publically attested to his character. Kavanaugh has presented calendars that he kept at the time which, along with the fact that no one who Ford identified as having been present at the party at which the Judge supposedly attacked her has any recollection of the event, decisively establish that he could not have done the act of which he is accused.<\/p>\n

\u201cCredibility\u201d in the case of Christine Ford, in contrast, has a dramatically different meaning.<\/p>\n

The sex crimes prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, who the Republicans arranged to question Ford released her findings over the weekend.\u00a0 The facts of which she reminds the public are crucial.<\/p>\n

For starters, Mitchell notes that Ford fails to supply a consistent account of that which is most fundamental, i.e. the year <\/em>in which the event in question is alleged to have occurred.<\/p>\n

Repeat this to yourselves: A woman who claims to have been traumatized by someone who sexually attacked her can\u2019t even recollect the year\u2014and, thus, her age\u2014when it transpired.<\/p>\n

Mitchell supplies some other insightful observations.<\/p>\n

Ford doesn\u2019t remember how she got to and from the party where the event is alleged to have happened, nor does she recall any other details of the night \u201cthat could help corroborate her account.\u201d\u00a0 Such details include the house<\/em> in which she insists the assault occurred and the location<\/em> of the house.<\/p>\n

Mitchell mentions the fact that when Ford shared with her husband that she had been sexually assaulted, she \u201cchanged her description of the incident to become less specific.\u201d<\/p>\n

She also points out that Ford \u201cstruggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.\u201d What Mitchell seems to mean by this is that it evidently took Ford over 30 years<\/em> before she mentioned to anyone that it was Brett Kavanaugh who supposedly assaulted her. Furthermore, she was married for over ten years before she told her husband that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her.<\/p>\n

Mitchell\u2019s conclusion is as powerful as it is inescapable: \u201cThe activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford\u2019s attorneys likely affected her account.\u201d<\/p>\n

Although the sex crimes prosecutor\u2019s findings exonerate Judge Kavanaugh while exposing Ford for the untruthful person that she is, any remotely honest person who had been paying any attention to this national disgrace of a Senate confirmation hearing knew long before Rachel Mitchell came to D.C. that Ford\u2019s story is most in<\/em>credible.<\/p>\n

Ford\u2019s witnesses\u2014every single one of them<\/em>\u2014either refute her story directly or, insofar as they deny that they have any recollection of the events that she recounts, indirectly.\u00a0 And at least one of these witnesses is a person with whom she\u2019s be close friends for most of her life.<\/p>\n

Initially, Ford claimed that it was four teenage boys that had her alone in a bedroom (of a mystery house whose location and owners she can\u2019t recall). This, she said, happened to her when she was in her later<\/em> teenage years sometime in the mid<\/em>-1980s.\u00a0 Subsequently, though, Ford changed her story.\u00a0 The remake takes place in the early<\/em> 1980s when Ford is a younger<\/em> teenager and is trapped with only two <\/em>boys.<\/p>\n

Ford initially said that she didn\u2019t want to fly from her home on the west coast to Washington D.C. to testify before the Senate because she had a fear of flying. However, this \u201cfear\u201d never stopped her from flying to many vacation spots.<\/p>\n

There are still more reasons that put the lie to Ford\u2019s account:<\/p>\n

(1)Ford is a woman of the left;<\/p>\n

(2)She refused to allow the Senate Judiciary Committee to see her therapist\u2019s notes concerning the sexual assault that she allegedly suffered at the hands of Kavanaugh;<\/p>\n

(3) Ford never uttered a peep about this incident until this past July, nearly four decades after Brett Kavanaugh entered public life and long after he became a visible and influential public figure;<\/p>\n

(4)She says that she wished to remain anonymous, and yet Ford had been speaking to the virulently anti-Trump, leftist Washington Post; <\/em><\/p>\n

(5)Ford says that she always desired anonymity, and yet months before<\/em> anyone learned of her name<\/em>, Ford had her entire social media history, her entire internet presence, eradicated\u2014a feat for the accomplishment of which she would have surely needed help.<\/p>\n

Yet despite all of the foregoing considerations, many of Kavanaugh\u2019s Ford-sympathizing defenders maintain that Ford is\u2026credible.\u00a0 What in the world could they mean?<\/p>\n

Assuming that they aren\u2019t just virtue-signaling, such Kavanaugh supporters could only mean that Ford strikes them as sincere.\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n

Period.<\/p>\n

Since there is quite literally zero evidence to substantiate her charges, and considerable evidence that militates against it, it can\u2019t be the case that these Kavanaugh defenders find Ford\u2019s testimony defensible<\/em>\u2014for it most certainly is not anything of the kind.<\/p>\n

And precisely because of the numerous inconsistencies and gaps in Ford\u2019s account, it can\u2019t be the case that they think that her account is credible even in the sense of being plausible<\/em>, for it is most implausible.<\/p>\n

That leaves only sincerity.<\/p>\n

Christine Ford is \u201ccredible,\u201d then, because she sounded like she really believed what she was saying.<\/p>\n

However, when it is remembered that actors, the self-delusional, the insane, the wildly irrational, and good liars sound like they too really believe the nonsense that flies from their mouths, it should be that much clearer that \u201ccredibility\u201d has a very different meaning in the case of Christine Ford than it has when used in connection with Brett Kavanaugh. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

To hear numerous GOP and GOP-friendly (\u201cconservative\u201d) commentators tell it, both Christine Ford and Brett Kavanaugh are highly \u201ccredible.\u201d Of course, none of these pundits claim to believe that Ford was telling the truth when she claimed that she was sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh.\u00a0 What they claim to believe is that she was indeed…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":399,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nChristine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh: Two Definitions of "Credibility"<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh: Two Definitions of "Credibility"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"To hear numerous GOP and GOP-friendly (\u201cconservative\u201d) commentators tell it, both Christine Ford and Brett Kavanaugh are highly \u201ccredible.\u201d Of course, none of these pundits claim to believe that Ford was telling the truth when she claimed that she was sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh.\u00a0 What they claim to believe is that she was indeed…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-02T12:53:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jack Kerwick\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh: Two Definitions of \"Credibility\"","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh: Two Definitions of \"Credibility\"","og_description":"To hear numerous GOP and GOP-friendly (\u201cconservative\u201d) commentators tell it, both Christine Ford and Brett Kavanaugh are highly \u201ccredible.\u201d Of course, none of these pundits claim to believe that Ford was telling the truth when she claimed that she was sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh.\u00a0 What they claim to believe is that she was indeed…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html","og_site_name":"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture","article_published_time":"2018-10-02T12:53:58+00:00","author":"Jack Kerwick","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html","name":"Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh: Two Definitions of \"Credibility\"","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-02T12:53:58+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-02T12:53:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/6832222998cc14717ded1849531201c5"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2018\/10\/christine-ford-vs-brett-kavanaugh-two-definitions-credibility.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh: Two Definitions of “Credibility”"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/","name":"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Jack Kerwick","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/6832222998cc14717ded1849531201c5","name":"Jack Kerwick","description":"I have a Ph.D. in philosophy from Temple University, a master's degree in philosophy from Baylor University, and a bachelor's degree in philosophy and religious studies from Wingate University. I teach philosophy at several colleges in the New Jersey and Pennsylvania areas.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.jackkerwick.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/author\/jkerwick"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/399"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1928"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1928\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1929,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1928\/revisions\/1929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}