{"id":1517,"date":"2016-06-23T22:31:02","date_gmt":"2016-06-24T02:31:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/?p=1517"},"modified":"2016-06-23T22:31:02","modified_gmt":"2016-06-24T02:31:02","slug":"nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html","title":{"rendered":"Are NeverTrumpers &#8220;Pro-Hillary?&#8221; Not Necessarily"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Are (Republican) NeverTrumpers \u201cpro-Hillary,\u201d as some of their critics are now claiming?<\/p>\n<p>Not necessarily.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s true that if the NeverTrumper gets his wish and Donald Trump\u2019s candidacy fails, then the outcome will be a Hillary Clinton presidency.\u00a0\u00a0 Yet just because the outcome of not voting for Trump is exactly the same as that of actually voting for Hillary Clinton, these may still be two distinct acts, for consequences alone do not an act make.<\/p>\n<p>Abortion, for instance, is regarded by many as an immoral act. No one, however, regards as immoral surgery meant to save the life of a woman with an ectopic pregnancy. The consequence of the one act is exactly that of the other\u2014the death of the unborn child. Yet these are still two distinct acts.<\/p>\n<p>Obviously, it is not the <em>consequence<\/em> of each act that differentiates them\u2014there is no difference in the consequences. It is, rather, the <em>intentions <\/em>informing these actions that distinguish them from one another.<\/p>\n<p>An abortionist <em>intends <\/em>the death of the unborn child. The doctor who removes the fallopian tubes of the woman with an ectopic pregnancy, though he <em>foresees<\/em> that in so doing he will bring about the death of the child, does not intend any such thing.<\/p>\n<p>That one act is considered wrong by many but the other wrong by virtually no one makes sense in light of the Christian moral doctrine of \u201cdouble effect.\u201d According to this doctrine, if a person <em>foresees<\/em> that his action will bring about an otherwise immoral outcome, it may still be permissible for him to perform it as long as he doesn\u2019t <em>intend<\/em> this outcome.<\/p>\n<p>Now, \u201cintentions,\u201d it\u2019s crucial to recognize, are not subjective psychological processes. If some acts, as most of us seem to think, are right or wrong regardless of context, irrespectively of their outcomes\u2014if some acts are <em>just <\/em>right or <em>just <\/em>wrong\u2014then it must be the case that the acts embody as well their own intentionality, their own internal logic.<\/p>\n<p>Abortion is, essentially, by design, the intentional killing of an unborn child. A procedure aimed at saving a mother\u2019s life from an ectopic pregnancy embodies no such intention.<\/p>\n<p>Take another example. Suppose I shoot a gun in a crowded place and strike down innocents. That <em>I <\/em>may not have been <em>motivated <\/em>by any desire to harm anyone, that I didn\u2019t mean to harm anyone, doesn\u2019t\u2019 get me off the hook, for the act that I performed is designed, as it were, to jeopardize others. This is what is implied by such common manner of speaking as, \u201cIt just so <em>happened <\/em>that, thankfully, no one got hurt.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Now, if the NeverTrumper is simply one who refuses to vote for Trump, then\u2014in light of the doctrine of double effect\u2014it doesn\u2019t seem right to say that he is \u201cpro-Hillary,\u201d for the act of refusing to vote for Trump has as its essential aim the prevention of a Trump presidency. Granted, the NeverTrumper foresees that if enough people think as he does, then a Hillary presidency will be inevitable. But he does not intend for Hillary to win. Theoretically, he may object to her just as much, if not more so, than he objects to Trump.<\/p>\n<p><em>If <\/em>the NeverTrumper, from an <em>informed <\/em>conscience, judges that voting for Trump is itself an evil act, <em>then<\/em> it would indeed be immoral for him to vote for the GOP nominee. And it would remain immoral for him to vote for Trump even if, from that same <em>informed <\/em>conscience, he believed that voting for Hillary is the <em>greater <\/em>of the two evils and that only by voting for Trump could he preclude the greater evil of a Hillary presidency.<\/p>\n<p>As the Scriptures say, we must never do evil so that good may come from it.<\/p>\n<p>Still, in point of fact, it is highly doubtful that the NeverTrumper objects to Trump from conscience. Although the typical NeverTrumper would have us think that it is his commitment to \u201climited government\u201d and\/or \u201cConstitutional conservatism\u201d that prevents him from voting for Trump, this is immediately seen for the lie that it is the moment we realize that these same NeverTrumpers have been enthusiastically advancing the interests of just those Republican politicians who for decades have been at least as wedded to Big Government as is Trump.<\/p>\n<p>These NeverTrumpers have enthusiastically been supporting a party that, culturally, socially, economically, and politically, has facilitated America\u2019s movement to the left. They have happily endorsed such faux conservatives as John McCain, Mitt Romney, and George W. Bush\u2014all of whom have, if not always in rhetoric, in effect, advocated on behalf of policies that, from a conservative perspective, are often even more objectionable than some of Trump\u2019s more objectionable stances.<\/p>\n<p>The truth of the matter is that NeverTrumpers will never support him because Trump threatens the status quo. He threatens them professionally and, inasmuch as his foreign policy vision is at odds with the failed neoconservative vision that they\u2019ve peddled all throughout the Bush II years to the present, he threatens them ideologically as well.<\/p>\n<p>The NeverTrumpers actually <em>would <\/em>prefer Hillary to Trump.<\/p>\n<p>From the juxtaposition of the relentlessness with which they attack Trump and their relative silence on Hillary, it is hard to infer any other conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Are (Republican) NeverTrumpers \u201cpro-Hillary,\u201d as some of their critics are now claiming? Not necessarily. It\u2019s true that if the NeverTrumper gets his wish and Donald Trump\u2019s candidacy fails, then the outcome will be a Hillary Clinton presidency.\u00a0\u00a0 Yet just because the outcome of not voting for Trump is exactly the same as that of actually&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":399,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1517","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Are NeverTrumpers &quot;Pro-Hillary?&quot; Not Necessarily<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Are NeverTrumpers &quot;Pro-Hillary?&quot; Not Necessarily\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Are (Republican) NeverTrumpers \u201cpro-Hillary,\u201d as some of their critics are now claiming? Not necessarily. It\u2019s true that if the NeverTrumper gets his wish and Donald Trump\u2019s candidacy fails, then the outcome will be a Hillary Clinton presidency.\u00a0\u00a0 Yet just because the outcome of not voting for Trump is exactly the same as that of actually&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-24T02:31:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jack Kerwick\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Are NeverTrumpers \"Pro-Hillary?\" Not Necessarily","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Are NeverTrumpers \"Pro-Hillary?\" Not Necessarily","og_description":"Are (Republican) NeverTrumpers \u201cpro-Hillary,\u201d as some of their critics are now claiming? Not necessarily. It\u2019s true that if the NeverTrumper gets his wish and Donald Trump\u2019s candidacy fails, then the outcome will be a Hillary Clinton presidency.\u00a0\u00a0 Yet just because the outcome of not voting for Trump is exactly the same as that of actually&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html","og_site_name":"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture","article_published_time":"2016-06-24T02:31:02+00:00","author":"Jack Kerwick","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html","name":"Are NeverTrumpers \"Pro-Hillary?\" Not Necessarily","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-06-24T02:31:02+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-24T02:31:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/6832222998cc14717ded1849531201c5"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2016\/06\/nevertrumpers-pro-hillary-not-necessarily.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Are NeverTrumpers &#8220;Pro-Hillary?&#8221; Not Necessarily"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/","name":"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Jack Kerwick","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/6832222998cc14717ded1849531201c5","name":"Jack Kerwick","description":"I have a Ph.D. in philosophy from Temple University, a master's degree in philosophy from Baylor University, and a bachelor's degree in philosophy and religious studies from Wingate University. I teach philosophy at several colleges in the New Jersey and Pennsylvania areas.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.jackkerwick.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/author\/jkerwick"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/399"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1517"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1517\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1518,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1517\/revisions\/1518"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}