{"id":1014,"date":"2014-01-19T20:57:42","date_gmt":"2014-01-20T01:57:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/?p=1014"},"modified":"2014-01-19T20:57:42","modified_gmt":"2014-01-20T01:57:42","slug":"the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html","title":{"rendered":"The Case of Edward Snowden: Reason versus Rhetoric"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">For a conservative who seeks to conserve the tradition of constitutional liberty bequeathed to Americans by their Founders, the spectacle of self-sworn apostles of liberty in the so-called \u201cconservative\u201d media calling for Edward Snowden\u2019s head on a platter is a painful one to behold. Yet neither is this sight particularly gratifying to those of us who prize sober thinking, for the logic underwriting these calls is as woeful as the rhetoric is irrational. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">If, as Snowden (to say nothing of legions of other Americans) believes, the NSA has acted unconstitutionally, this means that it has acted <i>illegally, <\/i>for the Constitution is the fundamental law of the land.\u00a0 Those (including sympathizers like Rand Paul) who think that Snowden should be punished for \u201cviolating\u201d his contractual obligations as a government employee speak nonsense, for no employee, in any profession, is legally bound to perpetrate, either directly or obliquely, an illegality.\u00a0 It is exactly and only because Snowden believed that the NSA was acting illegally (unconstitutionally) that he blew the whistle in the first place. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">To accuse him of being a traitor or criminal is to beg the question here.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">To the objection that no federal court that has looked at the NSA\u2019s methods have yet found them to be in circumvention of the Constitution, we need only note that the objection boils down to this: the federal government has declared that the federal government is acting constitutionally. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">The objectors should take our reply for what it\u2019s worth as they ponder that the federal courts have also declared the constitutional rights of slave masters to their slaves, women to abortion on demand, and state governments to force racial segregation. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">This notion that Snowden is a \u201ctraitor\u201d is also puzzling.\u00a0 <i>Who<\/i> did he betray, and <i>how <\/i>did he betray them?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">Millions upon millions of American citizens not only don\u2019t feel betrayed by Snowden; they regard him as a hero for bringing to their attention something to which they would have otherwise remained oblivious.\u00a0 Yet let\u2019s set this aside and assume that Snowden\u2019s detractors mean to say that he betrayed his country by weakening the government\u2019s ability to keep Americans safe.\u00a0 This notion is deeply problematic in its own right.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">It\u2019s not clear how Snowden could have compromised the government\u2019s ability to protect Americans from terrorist attacks, for the very idea is inconsistent with Snowden\u2019s enemies\u2019 contention that the NSA is constitutionally sound.\u00a0 In other words, if, as they maintain, there is nothing in the least bit either morally or legally objectionable about the NSA, then the latter should be able to keep right on course. \u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">If, <i>pre<\/i>-Snowden, the NSA was able to keep us safe from terrorist attacks by accessing countless millions of phone records, and if there is nothing unconstitutional about this, then, <i>post<\/i>-Snowden, it should be able to continue keeping us safe from terrorist attacks by accessing countless millions of phone records. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">That scores of Americans and others from around the world now know what the NSA has been doing all along is, or at least should be, neither here nor there\u2014<i>if <\/i>it was never doing anything wrong in the first place. For if it was never acting impermissibly to begin with, there is nothing that it needs to change\u2014regardless of whether American citizens like it or not.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Snowden observed and reported what he thought was one of the greatest acts of theft in our country\u2019s history, a crime by which the federal government attempted to deprive this generation and their posterity of their birthright, the liberty for which their fathers sacrificed all and which they codified in the Constitution that they ratified.\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">But, the Snowden haters insist, <i>there was no crime.\u00a0 <\/i>Two things here should be borne in mind.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">First, even if this is true, it certainly isn\u2019t <i>obviously <\/i>true.\u00a0 Or, rather, it is \u201cobviously\u201d true only to Republicans, for if it was so clear that Snowden was off base, then, presumably, the federal government wouldn\u2019t be launching investigations into its own activities and huge numbers of Americans\u2014<i>including<\/i> office holders in the federal government itself\u2014wouldn\u2019t agree with Snowden that a crime <i>has <\/i>been done. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">Second, even if there is no crime here, that, as I just noted, it is not at all obvious that there isn\u2019t, should serve to relieve Snowden of much of the scorn that\u2019s being heaped upon him.\u00a0 Just because one can\u2019t be <i>certain <\/i>that it is a mugging that\u2019s occurring in the dark alleyway doesn\u2019t mean that one hasn\u2019t a responsibility to notify the authorities.\u00a0 Snowden acted responsibly. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">But he didn\u2019t, his opponents maintain. He could\u2019ve notified his superiors about his concerns.\u00a0 Instead, he chose to go public with them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">To think about this last objection for more than a few seconds is to realize that it is on a par with demanding of a witness to a crime that he first go and register his complaint with the alleged criminal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Calibri\">Snowden deserves to be thanked for stirring up an especially spirited national conversation over the relationship between security and liberty.\u00a0 Yet maybe time will also prove us to be in his debt for stirring up a national conversation over the\u00a0relationship between ideological rhetoric and clear thought. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">For the latter I won\u2019t hold my breath. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For a conservative who seeks to conserve the tradition of constitutional liberty bequeathed to Americans by their Founders, the spectacle of self-sworn apostles of liberty in the so-called \u201cconservative\u201d media calling for Edward Snowden\u2019s head on a platter is a painful one to behold. Yet neither is this sight particularly gratifying to those of us&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":399,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The Case of Edward Snowden: Reason versus Rhetoric<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Case of Edward Snowden: Reason versus Rhetoric\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"For a conservative who seeks to conserve the tradition of constitutional liberty bequeathed to Americans by their Founders, the spectacle of self-sworn apostles of liberty in the so-called \u201cconservative\u201d media calling for Edward Snowden\u2019s head on a platter is a painful one to behold. Yet neither is this sight particularly gratifying to those of us&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-01-20T01:57:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jack Kerwick\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Case of Edward Snowden: Reason versus Rhetoric","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Case of Edward Snowden: Reason versus Rhetoric","og_description":"For a conservative who seeks to conserve the tradition of constitutional liberty bequeathed to Americans by their Founders, the spectacle of self-sworn apostles of liberty in the so-called \u201cconservative\u201d media calling for Edward Snowden\u2019s head on a platter is a painful one to behold. Yet neither is this sight particularly gratifying to those of us&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html","og_site_name":"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture","article_published_time":"2014-01-20T01:57:42+00:00","author":"Jack Kerwick","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html","name":"The Case of Edward Snowden: Reason versus Rhetoric","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-01-20T01:57:42+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-20T01:57:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/6832222998cc14717ded1849531201c5"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/2014\/01\/the-case-of-edward-snowden-reason-versus-rhetoric.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Case of Edward Snowden: Reason versus Rhetoric"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/","name":"At the Intersection of Faith and Culture","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Jack Kerwick","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/6832222998cc14717ded1849531201c5","name":"Jack Kerwick","description":"I have a Ph.D. in philosophy from Temple University, a master's degree in philosophy from Baylor University, and a bachelor's degree in philosophy and religious studies from Wingate University. I teach philosophy at several colleges in the New Jersey and Pennsylvania areas.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.jackkerwick.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/author\/jkerwick"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1014","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/399"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1014"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1014\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1015,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1014\/revisions\/1015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/attheintersectionoffaithandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}