Beliefnet
  
advertisement

Is the Big Lie No Big Deal?

We hear them from politicians, read them in memoirs, and watch shows where the ability to do it is rewarded. But is lying ok?
By Andrea Simakis
Religion News Service



Print Page

It's official. Fibbing is OK if it serves a higher purpose. Oprah said so.

The queen of all media tossed this ethical grenade recently when she called CNN's Larry King to defend his guest, James Frey, author of mega-best-seller "A Million Little Pieces." Frey's memoir of addiction and recovery was featured on the "Oprah Winfrey Show" when it was anointed the October selection of the world's most powerful book club.

The champagne went flat Jan. 8 when The Smoking Gun, a Web site devoted to investigative reporting, posted a damning story with the tantalizing tagline "The Man Who Conned Oprah." What followed was an old-school piece of "gotcha!" journalism that showed how Frey had embellished and, in some cases, fabricated significant events in the vomit-stained account of his life. Frey admitted to King he had taken dramatic license but said he stood by "the essential truth" of his life.

As King was about to sign off, Winfrey phoned to say the report outing Frey was "much ado about nothing."

What mattered, Winfrey said, was that millions of people struggling with their own monkey-on-the-back habits had read Frey's book and felt better. In a nation addicted to feeling good, she implied, swallowing a little pill of deception is a small price to pay.

Winfrey's take on lying is not new -- Machiavelli said it first when he wrote "the end justifies the means," the greatest rationalization for bad acts ever -- and it appears plenty of Americans agree.

William Bastone, editor of The Smoking Gun, says that in the avalanche of comments about the Frey expose, some 40 percent of people sent "how dare you" messages. They were furious at the reporters, not Frey.

Bastone and staff were stunned. "Where's the outrage?" he says. It's the same question he asked when Americans uttered a collective "Who cares?" after Martha Stewart was jailed for lying to federal prosecutors about whether she received a tip to dump her ImClone stock before it tanked. Once Stewart was freed from prison, she did not go into hiding; she made public appearances wearing her electronic ankle bracelet like a bauble from Cartier.

When did public lying become a resume booster?
Read more on page 2 >>


_Related Features

« Prev Page Next Page »
Page  | 2 

Print Page
Andrea Simakis is a writer for The Plain Dealer of Cleveland.

Copyright 2006 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.

advertisement
Poll
Is truth-telling essential in non-fiction?
Yes. Anything else is fiction or lying.
Yes, if you are writing history, but not if you are writing a memoir.
No. Reconstructing the past always combines fact and fiction.

vote       View Results
Talk About It

Related Features

related
True Lies
I took liberties with the facts in my own memoir and in the life of the patriarch Abraham. Am I a fibber like James Frey? By David Klinghoffer
Faiths & Practices | Inspiration | Health | Entertainment | Comfort & Support | Family & Home
Relationships | News & Blogs | Audio/Video | Discussions | Ecards | Prayer Circles | Meditations | Quizzes
Copyright © 2008 Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved.
Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service
and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.