The nation's 2.4 million Episcopalians belong to a global association of nearly 40 national church bodies, the Anglican Communion, whose African members have emerged as fast-growing powerhouses. Since Robinson's confirmation, Episcopal conservatives who regard homosexual activity as a violation of biblical teaching have discussed ways their church might be sanctioned, or even displaced, by the communion. And they have drawn highly public support from socially conservative bishops in some African churches who share a disdain for the ordination of gay men and lesbians as priests.
There's a danger here--one that has to do with perceptions, especially among Americans who know so little about that continent and its vital, complex, and fast-growing Christian population. From news reports, you might think that Africans are of one mind on the Episcopal decision (they aren't) or that this particular issue is dominant among them (it isn't).
Leading African Anglicans gained that reputation five years ago, when the Anglican Communion's bishops held their once-a-decade conference at Canterbury, England, which is the seat of the archbishop who is the Church of England's spiritual leader. Bishops from Africa and Asia were far more visible than at any previous meeting, owing to the fact that many new bishops had been created in those continents because of the church's growth there. Many of them threw their weight behind a resolution on human sexuality describing homosexual activity as "incompatible with Scripture." What's more, a number of African bishops were exceptionally good at backing up their votes with media-friendly sound bites. "To accept homosexuality in our church is for Anglicans to commit evangelical suicide," declared one Kenyan bishop.
All kinds of Christianity have enjoyed a boom period in post-colonial Africa, with memberships rising rapidly among Roman Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherans, Moravians and others. Between 1975 and 1995, for example, Africa's Catholic population doubled to more than 100 million, a period during which European Catholics barely grew at all.
Authorities on world Christianity see the faith's center of gravity shifting south; with the dynamic growth there, Africa will become increasingly influential among churches worldwide.
But while many African bishops have made it clear they firmly oppose ordination of gay men and women as priests, there are other prelates who warn them to stay away from the fight within the Episcopal Church. Foremost among the latter is the Archbishop of Cape Town, Njongonkulu Ndungane, who has bluntly criticized his fellow prelates for suggesting that the Episcopal Church has put itself outside the bounds of Anglicanism. In a recent newspaper interview, he called his fellow prelates "arrogant" and instead urged Anglicans to respect the Episcopal decision.
Ndungane isn't the only prelate urging African Anglicans take another course on this matter. His predecessor, Archbishop Desmond Tutu -- a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and probably the only name in African Christianity that many Americans would know - signed a 1999 document called the Cambridge Accord, which affirmed civil rights for gays and rejected the idea that Christian teaching could be used to discriminate against them.
It would also be a considerable stretch to call gay ordination the dominant issue for African Christians. Ndungane, Tutu and their fellow Anglicans all deal with a host of other serious, even dangerous concerns. Ndungane has been outspoken in urging churches to educate people about the dangers of HIV/AIDS. Last month, Tutu appeared as keynote speaker at a conference on lung disease, declaring that African governments ought to devote more money to health and less to military spending. A month earlier, an Anglican bishop from Uganda had gone to London to ask the British government to help tell the world about atrocities committed by a tenacious guerrilla army plaguing Uganda's north, where it kidnaps children to serve as soldiers. In the meantime, Christian leaders throughout Zimbabwe were denouncing that nation's rulers as authoritarian usurpers of democracy.