In response to recent interest in Catholic-Jewish relations, Beliefnet recently launched a new dialogue between Catholic and Jewish scholars, leaders, and clergy called "The Vatican and the Jews: Understanding the Past, Looking Toward the Future." The dialogue is in the form of an email exchange and continues with a following question about James Carroll's "Constantine's Sword" and its scholarship. Rabbi Dr. Ruth Langer, of Boston College's Center for Christian-Jewish Learning, responds:

Constantine's Sword is not a good work of history or theology, but itdoes fit well into the genre of contemporary literature where authorscarry their readers along on their personal journeys to greaterawareness and knowledge.

If we look at Carroll's work this way, we can be grateful to it for bringing some very important questions to the attention of the generalpublic, in a forum perhaps more effective than many others. And if weread this book as his personal "confession" (my preferred subtitlerather than his "a history"), then we also can read it with fullfreedom to disagree with his conclusions.

Carroll's questions I find generally correct. However, his answers areat best often ill-framed. Irritating the Church structures--true toCarroll's own roots in American counter-culture--is really not the wayto accomplish even the soul-searching that needs to precede anypotential changes. And Carroll's last section, his call for a 'Vatican III,'does precisely this, I'm afraid. His questions need to be couched insuch a way that they can be first heard, listened to, and then dialoguedwith.

Dr. Langer's review of "Constantine's Sword" is available on the website of the Center for Christian-Jewish Learning at Boston College.

Join the Discussion
comments powered by Disqus