Given that Christians are commanded to love the truth ("See to it that no one takes you captive through empty deception," St. Paul warns in Colossians 2:8.), people ought to be more careful.

Some Not Quite Ready for Prime Time religious leaders, including a couple who proudly acknowledge never cracking the cover of a Potter tome, have been heard quoting these phony stats. Those who choose to comment publicly on all things Potter owe it to their audiences to at least read the stories.

Even those Christians who have read the Potter books and sincerely believe that hobnobbing with Harry is dangerous have no excuse for treating their co-religionists like sulfur-belching fiends. In her book, Neal points out that sincere Christians may line up on either side of the Potter debate, but those who engage in personal attacks-whether they're calling Potter lovers "deceived" or dismissing Potter haters as "idiots"-are sinking into sin. Neal's proof is St. Paul's letter to the Galatians: Along with those who practice sorcery, he brackets those who engage in enmity, strife, and disputes-and warns that practicing any of them will keep us out of God's kingdom.

Christians are also warned not to get involved in pointless squabbles over what New Testament writers call "disputable matters"-and now I understand why. Were I not already a Christian, being viciously attacked by those who call themselves followers of Christ would hardly induce me to join them.

And reading Harry Potter books, or viewing the film, are "disputable matters." Within Christianity, disputable matters are points at which spiritual and cultural matters collide. Paul's letter to the Romans describes how first-century Christians argued over whether eating meat that their pagan neighbors had sacrificed to idols was sinful. Paul told them, in effect, to quit arguing about it. Regarding matters of conscience (as opposed to clear Biblical commands), he said, "Let each person be fully convinced in his own mind."

More Harry

Don't Mess with the Occult

Pagans on Potter
From our boards

Science vs. Magic
By Alan Jacobs

Harry's Star Chart

Satan's Little Messenger?
The Old Testament figure of Daniel shows how Christians might approach reading about sorcery, as opposed to practicing it. Taken from his Jerusalem home as an adolescent, Daniel was placed in King Nebuchadnezzar's court to study the language and literature of the Chaldeans-including astrology, sorcery, and magic. But when the king demanded an interpretation of a dream, Daniel told him flat out that the sorcery he'd been taught was a lot of hooey-that only God in heaven could reveal the mystery. Daniel is great example of being in the world without being it, as Christians are commanded to be.

This suggests that Christians are free to read our culture's literature-including the Potter books. We can also use it to witness to the One we worship, as some Christians are already doing with Rowling's creations.

Some Christians will conclude that it's wrong for them to read Harry Potter or see the film, believing the witchcraft too closely mimics the real thing, or that their own kids are too susceptible to real-life occultism. A loving Church will support their decision. But we should also support those who believe the books will help their children grow in wisdom.

Above all, when it comes to Harry Potter or any other cultural conundrum, we should relax; we know how the ultimate Story ends. God will not triumph over evil; He already has triumphed over evil, on the Cross, 2,000 years ago.

Which is why I hope my fellow Christians will cut me some slack. My kids and I have already bought opening-day tickets to "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone," and we can hardly wait to see it-even though saying so will probably result in the faithful clogging my e-mail box ( with letters consigning me to the heart of Hell.Just as well, I figure, since my Potter-loving kids will already be there. They'll need someone to remind them to floss.

Join the Discussion
comments powered by Disqus