Your Best Life Now

Your Best Life Now


Fundamentalist Christians Do Not Take the Bible Literally Either

posted by smcswain

Those who insist the Bible is “literally true” have all but destroyed the very Bible they want everyone to take seriously.

“How so?”

In two ways.  First, by insisting the Bible is literally true they have established a level of expectation for its authority that people simply cannot accept.  As I have written about already, for example, whenever fundamentalist Christians insist, and they almost always do, that Genesis is a scientific account of creation, taking place some 6 to 10,000 years ago and over a literal 24/7-day period of time, they are expecting people to accept this while denying everything science, astronomy, and biology have taught us.

This is not only silly, it’s suicidal. As the astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson so eloquently put it when he was recently asked by Stephen Colbert in his typically flippant and comical way, “What if I believe the earth is flat, even though you say it is round? Shouldn’t I get more than my share of time to say this, since my case will be harder to prove?”

“You get to say whatever you want…that the world is flat, if you’d like, because we live in a country that guarantees you free speech. But this is not a country that guarantees that what you say is correct.  What we have learned about the age and origin of the universe is true whether you want to believe it or not.”

In other words, to expect people to believe things about the Bible that simply are not so is not to “defend the Bible,” as fundamentalists almost universally but mistakenly think. It is to discredit the Bible instead. Rather than preserving its authority, it undermines it.

Second, the mere suggestion that the Bible is literally true is heretical…even a heresy. It cannot all be literally true, nor equal in its authority. And, even Fundamentalist Christians, who claim to hold the loftiest view of the inspiration of all scripture, do not take the Bible literally or with the same degree of authority throughout.

For example…

1. The Book of Deuteronomy says that children who are disobedient to their parents should be stoned to death (Deuteronomy 21:18-21).

Do they take this literally? Or, as equally authoritative?

2. The Book of Leviticus says that those who worship false Gods should be stoned to death, too (Leviticus 20:off).

Do they take this literally? Does anyone? Maybe the extreme radicals in all traditions. No sane person does, however.

Some say, “That’s the Old Testament. Admittedly, it has some things in it that we simply cannot accept today. But there are no such inconsistencies or contradictions in the New Testament.”

Really?

3. Then, what do you do with the Apostle Paul who instructed the Corinthian Church to discipline a misbehaving brother in Christ who was apparently living in some kind of incestuous relationship? Paul instructed the Church to gather at their weekly prayer service and “hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of his flesh” (1 Corinthians 5:1-5).

In other words, the “infallible” Saint Paul writing “inerrant scripture”…even the “words of God”…under the dictation and direction no less than the Holy Spirit instructs the Church that the next time they assemble for worship, they should release this man to Satan – was that in a prayer to Satan? – with the full expectation that Satan would kill him while God saved his eternal soul.

Not one of “Saint Paul’s” more saintly instructions, if you ask me. And, hardly an instruction that any sane person, much less Christian person, would take seriously today, much less literally. In fact, I’m pretty sure, if you attended church next Sunday and the pastor pointed out some brother’s failure and then summoned the church to pray that the poor soul be killed by the Devil so his soul would be saved for eternity…well…I don’t think I need to say anything else, do I?

Even Fundamentalist Christians do not take such scripture passages literally. If they, therefore, pick and choose those passages they do take literally, which of course they do, over those passages they do not, why do they continue the charade of insisting “all scripture is given by God?,” as even the saintly Paul once suggested to young Timothy? (2 Timothy 3:16).

It is all a charade. It is all dishonest. And, it must end.

After all, Jesus did not take scripture literally either.  Or, as equally authoritative. Which explains why he frequently said, “You have heard it said…but I say to you…” (see Matthew 5:38 as but one example). He would quote a teaching from the Hebrew scriptures and/or oral tradition and then he would bring a new level of consciousness to the interpretation of that scripture.

Shouldn’t we read scripture in a similar fashion? Bringing to the Bible’s limited world view, its frequent ethical inconsistencies, and its often contradictory teachings our best wisdom and discernment?

Shouldn’t we bring a new level of consciousness to our reading of scripture?

Shouldn’t Christian leaders help people to see through the limited teaching, as well as the limiting way the people of God believed and behaved in times past?

Shouldn’t Christian churches end the charade of insisting the Bible be taken literally? And, instead, help people to read the Bible for its insights, its wisdom, its inspiration, as well as its direction? Not as a rule book. Not as a literal dictation of God’s word. Not as the final word to all peoples in all times and in all places.

If the Church does not do this, there is little future for the Bible.



  • Marvin Bross

    None of it.

  • http://SteveMcSwain.com/com Dr. Steve McSwain

    Steve, in the event you do not know, we all make judgments about which sections of the Bible we do take “literally” which ones we don’t. But, as a student of scripture, I’m sure you know this already. For example, nobody pays any attention to Paul’s instructions in 1 Corinthians 5 – except perhaps wacko Christians and, yes, there are those around, too – but nobody of healthy mind and heart practices what Paul suggests the Corinthian church do to this young man who was apparently living in open adultery with his step-mother, mother-in-law, or maybe his own mother in an incestuous type relationship. I mean, let’s be very honest here, what church gets together and prays that it’s wayward members living in adultery or whatever the perceived sin…what church gets together and prays that such persons be killed by Satan so the soul will be saved? So, my point? More Christians would take 1 Corinthians 13 seriously – infinitely more seriously – than they would 1 Cor. 5. And, I would presume you would too. So, you too possess the wisdom, as we all do, to know what parts of the Bible to take – I would prefer the word – seriously – over literally. I wish you well in your walk with God. Thanks for your comments.

  • Steve Beckle

    And I suppose you, in your infinite wisdom, know exactly what parts should be taken literally, and what ones shouldn’t?

  • Anonymous

    Christianity, Judaism and Islam are the three most distructive religions that exhist. All of you are responsible for mass murder and atrocities such as the crusades. Christians sound exactly like islamic extremests. So God loves us but only if we listen and dont ask to many questions? Love me or else ill make your flesh melt off and you will spend eternity in hell? Why would I want to trust in a God like that? That sounds like the Quran. Thats worse than a man beating his wife becuase she didnt show him the respect he deserves when he comes home. He threatens us with eternal death if we dont believe him even though He put us here. What kind of a God is that? How many scientists burned people alive, invaded distant lands and forced people into slavery because they didnt believe there wild theory about string theory or the sun being at the solar systems center?

  • http://ThankyouforyourcommentsMargaret Dr. Steve McSwain

    If you would be so kind as to list here the last 3 books on “progressive revelation” you have read so that I, too, might read them I would appreciate it. I am sure other readers would, too. I will be watching for your response. Thanks again.

  • Margaret

    Clearly the writer of this article has never heard of progressive revelation.

    Perhaps they should read any basic book on hermeneutics before they put pen to paper and embarrass themselves further.

Previous Posts

Jesus: The Original "New Age" Thinker
You are a “New Age” Christian. What does this mean? And, why must people constantly label others? My critics sometimes say to me, “You’ve just become too ‘New Age’ for me.

posted 7:55:46am Dec. 09, 2014 | read full post »

Meeting Almighty, Mopping Floors
So much of what I do...I do...even while I am thinking of something else. Frequently, for example, I'll rush through a warm shower at dawn because I am thinking about all those things I must do, as well as the conversations I must have later that day...so I'm thinking about the things that I will sa

posted 2:14:17pm Nov. 28, 2014 | read full post »

Holy Spirit and Mindfulness...Here West Meets East
Lately, Vietnamese Buddhist Monk and Zen Master, Thich Nhat Hanh, has been on my mind. As you may know, he is still in a coma. We hope and pray for his recovery. Whenever I think of him, however, I am reminded of the beautiful story he tells in his book Living Buddha, Living Christ about the time

posted 11:27:25am Nov. 26, 2014 | read full post »

The Problem with Faith
The Problem with Faith I wish it were easier. It is not, however. In many ways, my spiritual walk was easier when it was not so complicated by faith. When I could reduce it to a catalogue of beliefs,

posted 1:23:58pm Nov. 24, 2014 | read full post »

The Voice Within
Several years ago, Christina Aguilera sang a popular song "The Voice Within." The lyrics go like this: When there's no one else, look inside yourself Like your oldest friend, just trust the voice within Then you'll find the strength that will guide your way If you will learn to begin to trust th

posted 11:12:43am Nov. 24, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.