by Donna Calvin
April 5, 2013
Actor Jeremy Irons brought up a great point.
“Could a father not marry his son?” Irons asked HuffPost Live host Josh Zepps. Irons argued that “it’s not incest between men” because “incest is there to protect us from inbreeding, but men don’t breed,” and wondered whether same-sex marriage might allow fathers to pass on their estates to their sons without being taxed.*
If so-called “gay marriage” passes the US Supreme Court Justices’ muster or is kicked back to the states, and those states choose for sodomite marriage – and these perverted forms of marriage become the norm in the USA, then we can anticipate all kinds of other weird marriages, including two that will entice many to enjoin to avoid estate taxes.
After all, once we dumb-down the definition of marriage to allow men to marry men and women to marry women, because all deserve to be united in the bonds of marriage under the “equality of the U.S. Constitution,” then we will no longer be able to deny fathers marrying their sons, even if they are already married to their son’s mother (bigamy will be challenged and found to be unconstitutional) and mothers marrying their daughters will have to be legitimatized as well!
In the future, those married sons and daughters can still marry anyone they want to later in life – bigamy will be nonexistent.
Estate taxes right now do not apply to married couples, so whose up for parents proposing marriage to their children of the same-sex!
Isn’t it gay!!!