Virtual Talmud

Virtual Talmud

Holocaust Restitution & the Claims Conference

In 1952 the Prime Minster of Israel, David ben Gurion made one of the gutsiest and hardest political decisions ever to have been made, he accepted restitution funds from West Germany –a country that had just murdered six million Jews. Many objected including future Prime Minister Menachem Begin. Ben Gurion held firm and saw the money as a means towards the end of an eternal antidote to another Holocaust: a powerful state of Israel.

Though the Holocaust took place over 60 years ago, we are only beginning to experience the complications surrounding the disbursement of Holocaust restitution funds. The last survivor will probably pass away in the next 20 years but they will leave behind billions in unclaimed monies that have been placed under thejurisdiction of the Claims Conference.


In recent years, the Conference has come under intense scrutiny. Some of it has come from Israeli quarters wanting a greater say in where the money is distributed. Others have argued that more of the money should be going to survivors residing in the former Soviet Union. However, the accusation most often thrown at the leaders of the Conference is the amount of money spent on administrative overhead, specifically the salaries of some of its top officials. The Jewish Chronicle recently revealed that the Conference’s highest-paid official, executive vice-president Gideon Taylor, was awarded $437,811 in salary and pension (2004 numbers).


The problem with those who complain about generous non-for-profit executive salaries is that they are not only fantastically delusional, but are actually asking to create a system of compensation that only awaits a fiscal meltdown. Why on earth we as a community would not want the most qualified and best trained business and economic minds to run a fund worth billions upon billions of dollars, is beyond me. I know it sounds nice to have someone working out of their own heart, but I would prefer someone who has a good mind and the right skill set to handle managing such a large sum of money. Why would we ever risk putting such an important task in the hands of people who are doing us a “favor?”

That said, it is still laughable to compare the average salary of a top corporate executive to what someone such as Taylor is making. There is no doubt that $400,000 is a lot of money, but if it wasn’t why would anyone take the job seriously? I am sure we could find some individual willing to take it on as their personal tzedakah (charity) to the memory of the survivors, but to be honest I am more concerned with making sure their legacy is kept in the most safe and secure hands out there.


Read the Full Debate: Is the Search for Restitution OK?

Comments read comments(2)
post a comment

posted April 12, 2007 at 12:59 am

So why is that almost four times more important than the pay of a full general with 30+ years of service and responsibility for several thousand lives? Or eight times more important than a company commander directly responsible for what is often several millions of dollars of taxpayer property and for the care, feeding, clothing, training and housing of up to 150 people? Or is he equal to the President of the United States, who is grossly underpaid for what the job requires? These people (and I have been in command) take their jobs much more seriously than any civilian can ever imagine for much less pay. No NCO is paid what they are worth as a leader.

report abuse

Scott R.

posted April 12, 2007 at 11:31 pm

Then why do we allow the leader of a company that is laying off workers take a $30-50 million bonus on top of their already 7-figure salary?

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

The Task Is Never Finished
It has been heartwarming to read the warm responses to Rabbi Waxman's post asking Beliefnet to reconsider its decision to cancel Virtual Talmud. Virtual Talmud offered an alternative model for internet communications: civil discourse pursued in ...

posted 12:31:46pm Apr. 03, 2008 | read full post »

Some Parting Reflections
Well, loyal readers, all good things must come to an end and we’ve been informed that this particular experiment in blogging as a forum for creating wide-ranging discussion on topics of interest to contemporary Jews has run its course. Maybe ...

posted 1:00:29pm Mar. 31, 2008 | read full post »

Obama's Lesson and The Jewish Community
There are few times in this blog’s history when I have felt that Rabbi Grossman was one hundred percent correct in her criticisms of my ideas. However, a few weeks ago she called me out for citing a few crack websites on Barak Obama’s ...

posted 12:09:08pm Mar. 31, 2008 | read full post »

The Future of Race Relations
As a post-baby boomer, it is interesting to me to see how much of today’s conversation about racial relations is still rooted in the 1960s experience and rhetoric of the civil rights struggle, and the disenchantment that followed. Many in the ...

posted 4:04:41pm Mar. 25, 2008 | read full post »

Wright and Wrong of Race and Jews
Years ago, as a rabbinical student, I was one of a group of rabbinical students who visited an African American seminary in Atlanta. My fellow rabbinical students and I expected an uplifting weekend of interfaith sharing like we had experienced ...

posted 12:50:11pm Mar. 24, 2008 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.