Virtual Talmud

Virtual Talmud

Till Death Do Us Part?

One of the issues that has been gaining prominence recently on the American Jewish scene is whether non-Jews–typically the non-Jewish partner in an intermarriage–may be buried in Jewish cemeteries. Traditionally, Jewish law has forbidden non-Jews to be buried together with Jews but, with interfaith marriage rates in this country near 50%, there is new pressure to allow a Jewish final resting places to families that were committed to Judaism in life. A striking example is the Beit Olam cemetery outside of Boston–founded seven years ago as a Jewish cemetery that would welcome non-Jewish partners, it was expected to have enough lots to serve the needs of the Boston area for thirty years. It is already full and an expansion is under way.


The core issues surrounding the traditional practice of disallowing non-Jews to be buried with Jews are murky. The reasoning prohibiting the practice is dubious and stems from an age where relations between Jews and non-Jews were typically marked by hostility. In our own times, non-Jews are often not only a part of our circle of friends; with increasing frequency they are a part of our family. Add to this the fact that it’s not even always clear who is Jewish or not–the Reform and Reconstructionist movements accept patrilineal status (meaning, the child of a Jewish father and a non-Jewish mother is Jewish) while Conservative and Orthodox do not. A non-Jew who converts in the Conservative movement may be accepted as Jewish in some communities and not in others. The point is, with issues of personal status becoming increasingly fuzzy and intertwined, we do not want to make Jewish cemeteries and funeral directors the final arbiters of Jewish identity, especially in the face of grieving families.


The solution? Recognize that, for practical purposes, what makes a cemetery Jewish is that the cemetery as a whole is governed by Jewish customs and practices, and not the religious status of any given individual who may be buried there. Jewish cemeteries should welcome non-Jewish partners for burial, provided that the interment services are ecumenical and compatible with Jewish norms, and that no non-Jewish symbols are displayed. This, in fact, is the position that the Reform Movement took in 1914 and that has governed their practice ever since. This path welcomes the growing number of Jewish interfaith families while preserving the distinctive Jewish character of the cemetery as a whole. It is thus a fitting parallel in death for the way our communities should welcome interfaith couples in a life: as fellow travelers who are often dedicated to building and supporting Jewish homes and Jewish communities.

Comments read comments(2)
post a comment
jewish guy

posted January 23, 2007 at 12:54 am

this is a perfectly acceptable solution to the problem, as far as the irreligious and assimilated sectors of the community are concerned. however, if this becomes the norm amongst standard jewish cemeteries, then the orthodox community (and even those non-observant jews who still care about jewish chauvinism and tradition with regard to life and death customs), will need to establish breakaway cemeteries. that would not be a positive development.

report abuse


posted January 24, 2007 at 5:05 am

It will be interesting to watch how Gentiles put Christian symbols on their gravestones. A seder plate with 13 hands touching it? A ring of Stars of David with carpenter tools inside? Regardless, this shows that the Jewish community in Boston is dying out. How else to explain any controversy involving Gentiles and cemeteries. They’re not having these disputes in places like Kiryas Yoel which have young, fast-growing populations.

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

The Task Is Never Finished
It has been heartwarming to read the warm responses to Rabbi Waxman's post asking Beliefnet to reconsider its decision to cancel Virtual Talmud. Virtual Talmud offered an alternative model for internet communications: civil discourse pursued in ...

posted 12:31:46pm Apr. 03, 2008 | read full post »

Some Parting Reflections
Well, loyal readers, all good things must come to an end and we’ve been informed that this particular experiment in blogging as a forum for creating wide-ranging discussion on topics of interest to contemporary Jews has run its course. Maybe ...

posted 1:00:29pm Mar. 31, 2008 | read full post »

Obama's Lesson and The Jewish Community
There are few times in this blog’s history when I have felt that Rabbi Grossman was one hundred percent correct in her criticisms of my ideas. However, a few weeks ago she called me out for citing a few crack websites on Barak Obama’s ...

posted 12:09:08pm Mar. 31, 2008 | read full post »

The Future of Race Relations
As a post-baby boomer, it is interesting to me to see how much of today’s conversation about racial relations is still rooted in the 1960s experience and rhetoric of the civil rights struggle, and the disenchantment that followed. Many in the ...

posted 4:04:41pm Mar. 25, 2008 | read full post »

Wright and Wrong of Race and Jews
Years ago, as a rabbinical student, I was one of a group of rabbinical students who visited an African American seminary in Atlanta. My fellow rabbinical students and I expected an uplifting weekend of interfaith sharing like we had experienced ...

posted 12:50:11pm Mar. 24, 2008 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.