Via Media

Via Media


The ultimate irony

posted by awelborn

When reporters attempt to dissect the "reaction" to the Da Vinci Code, they concentrate on the Christians. The non-Christians deserve a day in the sun as well.

If you visit various discussion boards on the web, what you’ll find are conversations that usually end up focusing on the basics: Does God exist? Who was Jesus?

And for some reason, unknown to me, atheists and materialists seem to believe that DVC is on their side.

Of course, I hasten to say that in my opinion DVC is on no one’s side except Dan Brown’s – I’ve always tried to walk a line that’s careful to answer the questions the novel raises in readers’ minds, but without taking the book itself too seriously. There is no great thinking going on here, and to expend a lot of effort arguing over what ideology or spiritual system lies behind it seems to give the book way, way too much credit.

But as I’ve been reading over discussion boards and reflecting on my own email, I’m struck by two points:

1) Atheists and materialists who use DVC, thinking that the book is an argument for their side. To the extent that we even want to dignify it with the word "argument" – let’s remind those guys of something important. There’s divinity in DVC all right. It’s all over the place. All over women, all over and in Mary Magdalene, and perhaps (main oui!) even in Sophie Neveau. It’s just Jesus who gets left out. It’s a fun little point of illogic to bring up in discussions.

2) Those who don’t care about the specifics of DVC, but are glad that Christianity gets drilled. I think I mentioned last week about the letters I get scoring my DVC work that barely mention DVC. It’s kind of weird, but also kind of explains a lot.

And just a reminder (I post this occasionally, because we have new readers all the time) – my work isn’t a response to The Da Vinci Code. The existence of this novel in itself is of no consequence to me, as is the case with 99% of what’s on the "fiction" shelf. Okay – 97%.  I wouldn’t have said a word past my initial review if the mail hadn’t begun to pour in after that review was published. Mail indicating that some readers were taking this seriously. So, my work is a response to questions some readers have about DVC.

Christopher Blosser of the Ratzinger Fan Club has put together an excellent page of resources and articles. He’s got linked an article that I also link on my own DVC page, and one that I would heartily recommend if you’ve got someone who’s sold on DVC, but won’t listen to you because you’re a religious fanatic and all that: Laura Miller’s "Da Vinci Crock" article from Salon from 2004. Not exactly a religious fanatic, there. And she gets the job done just fine, pressing the basic point: Hey. The Priory of Sion was a fraud. Why do we need to talk about this for even one second more?



Advertisement
Comments Post the First Comment »
post a comment

Comments are closed.



Previous Posts

There is nothing I shall want
A couple of weeks ago, a memorial Mass for Michael was held here in Birmingham at the Cathedral. The bishop presided and offered a very nice, even charming homily in which he first focused on the Scripture readings of the day, and then turned to Michael, whom he remembered, among other things, as on

posted 9:24:16am Mar. 05, 2009 | read full post »

Revolutionary Road - Is it just me?
Why am I the only person I know..or even "know" in the Internet sense of "knowing"  - who didn't hate it? I didn't love it, either. There was a lot wrong with it. Weak characterization. Miscasting. Anvil-wielding mentally ill prophets.But here's the thing.Whether or not Yates' original novel in

posted 9:45:04pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Books for Lent
No, I'm not going to ask you about your Lenten reading lists...although I might.Not today, though. This post is about giving books to others. For Lent, and a long time after that. You know how it goes during Lent: Prayer, Fasting and Almsgiving, right?Well, here's a worthy recipient for your hard-

posted 9:22:07pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Why Via Media
How about....because I'm lame and hate thinking up titles to things? No?Okay...how about...St. Benedict? Yes, yes, I know the association with Anglicanism. That wasn't invovled in my purpose in naming the joint, but if draws some Googling Episcopalians, all the better.To tell the truth, you can bl

posted 8:54:17pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Brave Heart?
I don't know about you, but one of effects of childbirth on me was a compulsion to spill the details. All of them.The whole thing was fascinating to me, so of course I assumed everyone else should be fascinated as well in the recounting of every minute of labor, describing the intensity of discomfor

posted 10:19:45pm Mar. 03, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.