Via Media

Via Media


Scratch that

posted by awelborn

Bishop says no miracle in Dallas.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(10)
post a comment
Angolino

posted March 24, 2006 at 12:18 am


It’s good to know the truth about this. But does the Bishop’s tone seem a bit snippy to the poor priest? Perhaps the priest got carried away and maybe even went public in an unfortunate way. But this sounds kind of like a smack down. I’ll keep that parish in my prayers.



report abuse
 

Bender

posted March 24, 2006 at 2:25 am


does the Bishop’s tone seem a bit snippy
His tone? Can we please end this constant mindless, presumptuous, and corrosive questioning and doubting and slamming of our bishops?? Doesn’t anyone ever have anything good to say about them?? Must there be nothing but distain for these Successors of the Apostles??
Instead of criticism for every bishop under the sun, why don’t we rejoice in the Good News that is Jesus Christ?? Isn’t that what we are supposed to be all about??
Or is my tone too snippy?



report abuse
 

Magda

posted March 24, 2006 at 7:16 am


People who frequent comments sections, of all people, should know that the written word is not a great carrier of tone of voice.



report abuse
 

Joe Gloor

posted March 24, 2006 at 9:25 am


Isn’t it still a consecrated Host?
Who’s going to eat it now?



report abuse
 

Caroline

posted March 24, 2006 at 10:24 am


Why didn’t some one just consume it on the spot when the boy spat it out? I have had to do that in my hospital ministry. It’s the quickest and easiest solution.



report abuse
 

Thomas Hynes

posted March 24, 2006 at 11:34 am


It is a consecrated host as long as it has the attributes, ie. “accidents” of bread. If it has been digested by the mold it is no longer a consecrated host.



report abuse
 

thomas tucker

posted March 24, 2006 at 1:18 pm


i can hear them now: That’s what those Catholics get for worshipping bread and statues.



report abuse
 

cheyan

posted March 24, 2006 at 4:50 pm


So, if the mold digested the bread, does that mean that the colony of mold received the Blessed Sacrament?
(This is only partly a silly question. ‘Obviously’ fungus can’t receive communion worthily, because it has no brain. What about a cat or a dolphin? How about an intelligent, self-aware alien?)



report abuse
 

Fr Martin Fox (Septimus)

posted March 24, 2006 at 6:38 pm


There’s nothing improper about putting a host that won’t be consumed, into a bowl of water and to allow it to dissolve. That’s de rigeur for when a host, for various reasons, isn’t suitable for consumption, or even if consuming a host is repugnant.



report abuse
 

Todd

posted March 25, 2006 at 11:27 am


Receiving Communion is not as simple as the act of ingestion. It presumes participation in the Body of Christ, meaning an active life supporting the Reign of God, with the active cooperation with God’s plan through charity, love, justice, and other callings of the Holy Spirit.
Fr Fox is right: the proper procedure for a host not received and unable to be ingested was followed here.
Faithful, believing communicants receive the Blessed Sacrament, in the full meaning of the word “receive.” Fungi, dolphins, cats, and non-believing humans ingest a host. That’s all.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

There is nothing I shall want
A couple of weeks ago, a memorial Mass for Michael was held here in Birmingham at the Cathedral. The bishop presided and offered a very nice, even charming homily in which he first focused on the Scripture readings of the day, and then turned to Michael, whom he remembered, among other things, as on

posted 9:24:16am Mar. 05, 2009 | read full post »

Revolutionary Road - Is it just me?
Why am I the only person I know..or even "know" in the Internet sense of "knowing"  - who didn't hate it? I didn't love it, either. There was a lot wrong with it. Weak characterization. Miscasting. Anvil-wielding mentally ill prophets.But here's the thing.Whether or not Yates' original novel in

posted 9:45:04pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Books for Lent
No, I'm not going to ask you about your Lenten reading lists...although I might.Not today, though. This post is about giving books to others. For Lent, and a long time after that. You know how it goes during Lent: Prayer, Fasting and Almsgiving, right?Well, here's a worthy recipient for your hard-

posted 9:22:07pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Why Via Media
How about....because I'm lame and hate thinking up titles to things? No?Okay...how about...St. Benedict? Yes, yes, I know the association with Anglicanism. That wasn't invovled in my purpose in naming the joint, but if draws some Googling Episcopalians, all the better.To tell the truth, you can bl

posted 8:54:17pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Brave Heart?
I don't know about you, but one of effects of childbirth on me was a compulsion to spill the details. All of them.The whole thing was fascinating to me, so of course I assumed everyone else should be fascinated as well in the recounting of every minute of labor, describing the intensity of discomfor

posted 10:19:45pm Mar. 03, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.