Via Media

Via Media

Mending Fences

Toomey endorses Santorum

Comments read comments(16)
post a comment
Der Tommissar

posted September 9, 2005 at 4:37 pm

But will the Toomey-bots decommission themselves and cease the Santorum bashing?

report abuse

Dan LaHood LMC

posted September 9, 2005 at 4:50 pm

I’m a Repub but you can put this seat in the Dems column . Let’s have real pro-lifers in both parties, that would be a good thing.

report abuse


posted September 9, 2005 at 4:52 pm

Except that Casey wants judges that won’t overturn Roe v. Wade. So it’s all talk and no walk.

report abuse

mark j

posted September 9, 2005 at 5:00 pm

Casey must be really committed to those pro-life beliefs if he thinks Kerry would haave made a great president.

report abuse

Der Tommissar

posted September 9, 2005 at 5:03 pm

There are two groups of people that are predicting a Casey win:
Republicans in other states.
Democrats in other states.
The question should be, “Is anyone in Pennsylvania on fire for Casey? Anyone?”

report abuse


posted September 9, 2005 at 5:28 pm

How many times must I forgive my brother (Santorum)?

report abuse


posted September 9, 2005 at 5:32 pm

YOu Consservatiavcas are the sos stupid Casey si the pro-lafe mane evan thoghgh he suppportad Kerry and wold fillibuster the Bushitlers’s judges hesasy so so THeRe!!!!!!!#$@#$@

report abuse

Donald R. McClarey

posted September 9, 2005 at 5:59 pm

Toomey is a very big man and a very smart man. Big, because it always hurts to endorse someone who opposed you and probably cost you at least a primary victory. Smart, because this endorsement cements his position in the Pa. Republican party and means that Santorum will owe him a large political debt.

report abuse


posted September 9, 2005 at 7:03 pm

The irony is, Toomey is doing exactly what Santorum has been roundly criticized for doing: being a team player. It remains to see if Santorum will survive it — but I’m sure that Toomey has a political future in PA if not nationally.
I’m torn as to what one should think of Casey. On the one hand, it would be nice if there were solid pro-life constituencies in both parties. But at the same time, I can’t help thinking that having Casey in the senate would hurt the pro-life cause more than having Santorum in the senate. Not to mention to the fact that I disagree with Casey on most other issues simply as a matter of politics.
And so I find myself (while wishing there were more pro-life democrats) opposing just about any individual one.
I guess what I really wish is that there were a big enough pro-life constituency within the democratic party that they reliably elected pro-life candidates on their own, without stealing otherwise republican voters. But unfortunately it’s not that cold in hell yet…

report abuse


posted September 9, 2005 at 7:14 pm

What language was that by BillyHW, anyone know? Modern Welsh? Reformed Orckish? (sp?)

report abuse

reluctant penitent

posted September 9, 2005 at 8:05 pm

I think it’s parseltongue

report abuse


posted September 10, 2005 at 1:01 am

There is some fire regarding Casey’s popularity in Pennsylvania. Last year, in running and winning the State Treasurer’s office, Casey received the most votes any candidate has received for any office, local (duh), state, or national level, ever in history. Yeah, I know, that was just the state treasurer’s office, not the senate, and that will be a very big leap, but already he is facing an electorate that already has overwhelmingly voted for him for something. This can’t be insignificant.

report abuse


posted September 10, 2005 at 9:12 am

Toomey’s actions can mean any number of things; who knows which is true (more than one could be, of course)?
He’s being big about this, and giving Santorum a gift, asking nothing in return.
He’s been told, do this or else…
He got something in exchange; whether it was a good deal or not remains to be seen.
He blundered, or at least went too cheap (i.e., he could have waited, and exact some useful public commitment or acknowledgment from Santorum, such as, “I erred in going ga-ga over Specter”).
He doesn’t really care that much, he just wants to move on.
He wants to keep his powder dry and innoculate himself against any charge that he failed to help Santorum.
He may be doing the bare minimum — faint praise and little more. Politicians are the world’s experts at making nothing seem like everything. (Potempkin was a politician.)

report abuse

RP Burke

posted September 10, 2005 at 9:14 am

Well, St. Rick has said another absurd, demonstrably wrong thing lately, blaming the National Weather Service was wrong in its predictions about Katrina. From today’s Washington Post …
Meanwhile, in Pennsylvania, Santorum was drawing a second round of fire, this time for saying the National Weather Service’s forecasts and warnings about Katrina’s path were “not sufficient.” Democrats e-mailed audio links to a radio interview in which Santorum said that “we need a robust National Weather Service” that focuses on severe weather predictions. “Obviously the consequences are incredibly severe, as we’ve seen here in the last couple of weeks, if we don’t get it right and don’t properly prepare,” Santorum said.
In fact, many people think the Weather Service got the Katrina prediction exactly right. They include GOP Sen. Jim DeMint (S.C.), who chairs the Senate Commerce subcommittee on disaster prediction and prevention. He issued a statement headlined “DeMint Gives National Weather Service ‘A’ Grade for Katrina Prediction.”
Santorum, long at odds with the federal agency, is pushing a bill that would require it to surrender some of its duties to private businesses, some of them located in his state. The National Weather Service Employees Organization said in a statement: “We did our job well and everyone knows it. By falsely claiming that we got it wrong, Rick Santorum is continuing his misguided crusade against the National Weather Service.”
Santorum’s office issued a statement yesterday repeating the concern that “there are serious consequences” when the Weather Service falls short of “getting it right.”

How about the senator “getting it right”?

report abuse


posted September 10, 2005 at 1:01 pm


report abuse


posted September 11, 2005 at 5:50 pm is going to be the premier fundraiser for Casey and they love to encourage killing babies.
Recent fund raising effort for Casey got a $150,000 dollar return. My money goes to a Santoum over and the trash they promote.
Maybe Toomey knows who our friends really are. I’m for Santorum.

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

There is nothing I shall want
A couple of weeks ago, a memorial Mass for Michael was held here in Birmingham at the Cathedral. The bishop presided and offered a very nice, even charming homily in which he first focused on the Scripture readings of the day, and then turned to ...

posted 9:24:16am Mar. 05, 2009 | read full post »

Revolutionary Road - Is it just me?
Why am I the only person I know..or even "know" in the Internet sense of "knowing"  - who didn't hate it? I didn't love it, either. There was a lot wrong with it. Weak characterization. Miscasting. Anvil-wielding mentally ill prophets.But ...

posted 9:45:04pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Books for Lent
No, I'm not going to ask you about your Lenten reading lists...although I might.Not today, though. This post is about giving books to others. For Lent, and a long time after that. You know how it goes during Lent: Prayer, Fasting and ...

posted 9:22:07pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Why Via Media
How about....because I'm lame and hate thinking up titles to things? No? about...St. Benedict? Yes, yes, I know the association with Anglicanism. That wasn't invovled in my purpose in naming the joint, but if draws some Googling ...

posted 8:54:17pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Brave Heart?
I don't know about you, but one of effects of childbirth on me was a compulsion to spill the details. All of them.The whole thing was fascinating to me, so of course I assumed everyone else should be fascinated as well in the recounting of every ...

posted 10:19:45pm Mar. 03, 2009 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.