In the print edition, this was on the front page of the Post, below
the fold. What I find most amazing about it is what I would almost call
the innocence of the reporter. She seems utterly unaware of the
inconsistencies between the rhetoric of her clearly pro-choice position and
the actual substance of the laws reported. Women deserve full
disclosure for (say)breast implants, but not for abortion; programs that support
the choice of adoption are "restrictive;" etc.