The New Christians

The New Christians

Looking Back on Cornerstone: Phyllis Tickle’s Emergence

Cornerstone.pngMy primary role at Cornerstone was co-presenting a three-part seminar with Phyllis Tickle, long-time friend and author of many books.

We did a dog-and-pony show on the emergent/-ing/-ence movement that we’ve done before. IMHO, we work pretty well together, due to the fact that we’re pretty much in accord, but we do disagree on enough things to make it interesting to those gathered.


One of the first issues that PT addressed was the terminology that has been so bandied about in this conversation. I, as usual, took issue with it, saying that the conversation about Phyllis Tickle and Tony Jones.jpgemergent vs. emerging vs. emergence vs. missional is an internecine debate, and that it will be historians a century hence who will 1) decide if we’re worthy of a name, and 2) decide what that name is.  But I will say that after spending the week talking about such things with Phyllis, and her erstwhile daughter-in-law, Mary, I’ve had a bit of a change of heart.


My usual struggle with the term “emerging” (think Scot McKnight and Dan Kimball) is not that it’s associated with a more traditional, evangelical theology. My problem is that it’s not a term associated with the very metaphors that have been so resonant to those of us in the movement, viz., emergence theories in science.

Emergence science (think Phillip Clayton), lends us words in the family of emergence and emergent. While this may seem a silly semantic difference, it actually changes the nature of the conversation significantly. Whereas “emerging” implies something coming into view and becoming prominent (a relatively simple process), “emergent” is something (or a group of somethings) arising and existing only as a phenomenon of independent parts working together, and not predictable on the basis of their properties (an impossibly complex process).


So, what I’m saying is that maybe, just maybe, the idea of “emerging” does better fit those persons and groups who feel more comfortable with conventional evangelical theologies, and “emergent” is more appropriate for those of us more interested in following the various theological and philosophical rabbit holes that present themselves to us.

This is where Phyllis comes in. She claims that all such movements are a part of “Emergence Christianity,” which itself is subsumed by the broader global emergence — the massive, overarching cultural shift, often called globalization — taking place everywhere, right now.  It is, she claims, inevitable that Christianity would be swept up in the changes that are shaking economics, politics, science, education, and every other sphere of human endeavor.


So, all this to say that I’m coming around to Phyllis’s POV. Emergence Christianity may be the best term for those of us interested in talking about the meta-religious shifts taking place right now, rather than the more parochial concerns of the “next evangelicalism” or the “rebirth of the mainline” or something like that.

Photo courtesy of Jonathan Stegall

If you’re interested in the emergerce of Christianity, be sure to attend Christianity21.

Comments read comments(6)
post a comment
Florin Paladie

posted July 8, 2009 at 11:16 am

Semantics is the ever growing tension between etymology and future direction dictated by current usage. With this in mind it cannot be contested that Tony is right in pointing the way the terms emergent and emerging have been used. That’s fine, as we need tags to identify ourselves.
What I find interesting is that those that have tagged themselves as being ’emergents’ are the ones really interesting in emerging (ever evolving), whereas those that have hijacked for themselves the tag ’emerging’ are not really interested (as their actions and statements make it quite clear) in a deep constant emergence, but more of a surface, cosmetic emerging. They don’t, however, want to be tagged as traditional, they want to be in sync with culture (relevant) and not perceived as static. Again that’s all fine, we should be true to our leanings, to our hearts and thus find our identity.
What I never quite understood is why these “emerging” people want to be seen as part of the “emergent movement” if there is no true change of heart (they don’t really get along with the essential ideals of the “emergents”).

report abuse


posted July 8, 2009 at 3:57 pm

Here’s 2 possibilities I’ve come up with:
1. It’s a way to test the waters. Throw out the word “emerging” and see if you get the “You did say emergING not emergENT, I hope” response. That keeps the communication channel open with someone diametrically opposed. If, OTOH, you get the “Yeah, I’m full blown emergent” response, it opens up a new channel of communication with someone who’s on board.
2. It’s something more sinister. If they can co-opt and redefine the term(s), they can neutralize the movement – or at least set it back a few years without ever having to engage it (for the most part).

report abuse

Mike Stavlund

posted July 8, 2009 at 7:14 pm

This is a really helpful and clear distinction, Tony. I agree: ’emerging’ is not particular, but general (something is always ’emerging’ at all times throughout history). Whereas ’emergence’ is a particular description of a much wider cultural phenomenon, of which the shifts in Christianity are a part (I like to reference the wikipedia entry on ’emergence’ to provide a better understanding of the whole).
But I think the bigger story here is the ascendancy of Mary Tickle. For all of her persuasive powers, and over all of these years, Phyllis was unable to sway you to her thinking. But after only a few days with Mary, you were ready to repent. 😉

report abuse

bad credit repair companies

posted July 23, 2014 at 9:58 pm

Very interesting points you have observed , regards for putting up. “Never call an accountant a credit to his profession a good accountant is a debit to his profession.” by Charles J. C. Lyall.

report abuse

Dennis Groszkiewicz

posted July 26, 2014 at 11:52 am

I intended to create you that very small note in order to thank you very much over again for these remarkable methods you’ve contributed on this site. It was certainly wonderfully generous of you to give extensively precisely what a number of people could possibly have made available for an ebook in order to make some money for their own end, most notably seeing that you might have done it in the event you wanted. Those inspiring ideas also served to be the great way to fully grasp most people have the identical passion just as my personal own to know more and more regarding this matter. I am sure there are numerous more fun moments in the future for people who examine your blog.

report abuse

Kristopher Corbell

posted August 3, 2014 at 6:21 am

you’re truly a just right webmaster. The website loading speed is incredible. It kind of feels that you’re doing any unique trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve done a wonderful job in this matter!

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

My Blog Has Moved
Dear Readers, After a year with Beliefnet, I've decided to move to my own domain for my blogging.  It's been a fine year -- some things worked, other things didn't.  But in the end, I'll be a better blogger on my own.  My thanks to the ...

posted 12:13:57pm Nov. 13, 2009 | read full post »

The Most Important Cartoon of the Year
By Steve Breen, San Diego Tribune, October 18, 2009 ...

posted 8:51:22am Oct. 25, 2009 | read full post »

Social Media for Pastors
Following up on Christianity21, we at JoPa Productions are developing a series of boot camps for pastors who want to learn about and utilize social media tools like blogging, Twitter, and Facebook.  These are one-day, hands-on learning ...

posted 10:45:52am Oct. 22, 2009 | read full post »

Ending Christian Euphemisms: "Fundamentalist"
I've taken some heat in the comment section for using yesterday's post on "unbiblical" and a "higher view of scripture" as a thin foil for my own disregard of biblical standards. To the contrary, I was pointing to the use of the word unbiblical ...

posted 10:15:41am Oct. 21, 2009 | read full post »

Why You Should Get GENERATE
Last week at Christianity21, GENERATE Magazine debuted. With the tag line, "an artifact of the emergence conversation," it fit perfectly at the gathering. When I actually got around to reading it last weekend, I was truly surprised at how good ...

posted 3:14:37pm Oct. 20, 2009 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.