The New Christians

The New Christians


Pay No Attention to the Publisher behind the Curtain

posted by Tony Jones

Andrew Sullivan weighs in on that question.

Traditional newspapers are dying, to be sure (although I think that some of them will have a future as non-profits).  Andrew thinks that traditional publishing (ink-on-dead-trees) is in a similar state.  Money quote:

My own view is that the publishing industry deserves to die in its
current state. It never made economic sense to me; there are no real
editors of books any more; the distribution network is archaic; the
technology of publishing pathetic; and the rewards to authors largely
impenetrable. I still have no idea what my occasional royalty
statements mean: they are designed to be incomprehensible, to keep the
authors in the dark, to maintain an Oz-like mystery where none is
required.

BTW, I totally agree with him on the incomprehensibility of royalty statements.  I get statements from four different publishers, and I can’t understand any of them.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
Carla

posted February 1, 2009 at 2:16 pm


Just be happy you get them.
I do take issue with his assessment that there are no real editors anymore. But then, he doesn’t know me, so how could he know?



report abuse
 

Larry

posted February 1, 2009 at 11:03 pm


I suspect as e-publishing takes off the need for a publisher will decrease, as there will be no dead tree books to print and distribute. Publishers currently also server a gatekeeping function, however imperfectly, and there will need to be something to separate the trash from the stuff worth reading. Hopefully there will be something that works better than Digg for finding quality books. Amazon has a start on something like this, with their recommendation system, though it does tend to keep you in a “ghetto” of books just like the last books you read.



report abuse
 

Korey

posted February 2, 2009 at 3:24 pm


Speaking of Andrew Sullivan, when’s he going to include you on his Blog Love (Particularly in light on his recent commentary and reader feedback on atheism and theism)!? That would be great. I think he’d like reading you.



report abuse
 

Ian Scott Paterson

posted February 2, 2009 at 6:20 pm


I hate the “it doesn’t work, just let it die” approach everyone’s taking to just about everything these days. It doesn’t work: great, good observation, but don’t enable its incompatibility with the ideal. What ever happened to making things better? The publishing industry is definitely in a dark place and could use a massive overhaul, but I would be just as disappointed with throwing it aside as I am with letting it rot where it is now. Think of it as a green initiative. Let’s recycle dying industries and make them relevant as well as useful again.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

My Blog Has Moved
Dear Readers, After a year with Beliefnet, I've decided to move to my own domain for my blogging.  It's been a fine year -- some things worked, other things didn't.  But in the end, I'll be a better blogger on my own.  My thanks to the Bnet editorial staff; they've been very supportive. Ple

posted 12:13:57pm Nov. 13, 2009 | read full post »

The Most Important Cartoon of the Year
By Steve Breen, San Diego Tribune, October 18, 2009

posted 8:51:22am Oct. 25, 2009 | read full post »

Social Media for Pastors
Following up on Christianity21, we at JoPa Productions are developing a series of boot camps for pastors who want to learn about and utilize social media tools like blogging, Twitter, and Facebook.  These are one-day, hands-on learning experiences, currently offered in the Twin Cities and soon

posted 10:45:52am Oct. 22, 2009 | read full post »

Ending Christian Euphemisms: "Fundamentalist"
I've taken some heat in the comment section for using yesterday's post on "unbiblical" and a "higher view of scripture" as a thin foil for my own disregard of biblical standards. To the contrary, I was pointing to the use of the word unbiblical as a stand-in for a particularly thin hermeneutic. Ther

posted 10:15:41am Oct. 21, 2009 | read full post »

Why You Should Get GENERATE
Last week at Christianity21, GENERATE Magazine debuted. With the tag line, "an artifact of the emergence conversation," it fit perfectly at the gathering. When I actually got around to reading it last weekend, I was truly surprised at how good it is.There have been several efforts to begin a paper j

posted 3:14:37pm Oct. 20, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.