Science and the Sacred

Science and the Sacred

A Tough Mind and a Tender Heart


Source: Library of Congress

Each Monday, “Science and the Sacred” features an essay from one of the
BioLogos leaders: Francis Collins, Karl Giberson and Darrel Falk.
Today’s was written by Dr. Francis Collins.

I recently read some published sermons by the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. The depth and breadth of his eloquent defense of truth and justice are profoundly inspiring. My favorite of his sermons begins with a verse from Matthew: “Be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.” This exhortation must have seemed paradoxical to Christ’s followers — as it does to us — but Dr. King explains the real meaning: We are called to have both a tough mind and a tender heart, and we must be careful about when to apply each one.


By its very nature, science must be tough minded. Conclusions about how nature works must be arrived at by rigorous experimentation and development of theories that bring together numerous observations into a coherent structure. Even after a conclusion is reached, there must be intense skepticism about whether the theory is right. Scientists always seek to improve their theories, and, when necessary, overturn them. Whether deducing how the cell copies DNA or determining if a new drug for cancer actually works, there is no place for soft mindedness in science. Scientists are most definitely called to be as wise as serpents.

But what about those aspects of human existence that don’t have to do with understanding and controlling the material world? What about the bonds of trust and concern for family and friends, the tenderness of lovers, the calling we all experience to reach out to those less fortunate, and the spiritual impulse to seek something sacred that is greater than ourselves? If tough mindedness is the only attitude we bring to life, then our experiences in these other profoundly important areas will be impoverished.


The need for balance between head and heart is apparent when we look at the tension between the scientific and spiritual worldviews, especially in the United States. New Atheists hold science as a club over the heads of people who believe in God, implying that even considering the possibility of God reveals an inferior intellect. At the other extreme, fundamentalist believers discount scientific findings that violate their particular interpretation of the Bible, even if the meaning of those Scripture verses has been debated among devout Christians for millennia.

Building on Dr. King’s message, I encourage scientists — especially those with a predilection for attacking people of faith — to continue their tough mindedness in their exploration of nature. But when it comes to matters like the existence of God, the experience of beauty and the meaning of love, they must realize the scientific method has limitations to answer the questions. The heart may be a better guide than the mind in these cases.


Let me also encourage people of faith –especially those who distrust science — to seek God’s truth with all their hearts. But Jesus reminded us to, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, and all your soul, and all your mind.” That means taking the time to understand with our minds why scientists are so sure about conclusions like the age of the universe and the relatedness of living things through the process of evolution. We must not worry that this information somehow threatens God.

There is much good news here. Science and faith can indeed exist in harmony if we will just recognize the proper domain of each. Voicing that same theme of harmony between the tough mind and the tender heart, Dr. King quotes the 19th century German philosopher, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: “Truth is found neither in the thesis nor the antithesis, but in an emergent synthesis that reconciles the two.”


Dr. Francis Collins is former director of the Human Genome Project and founder and president of The BioLogos Foundation.


Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
Albert the Abstainer

posted June 22, 2009 at 10:20 am

The problem is not with faith, but belief. The two are very different. A hard-minded scientist can have an experiential based faith, but will reject the frame of belief that is erected around the great mystery.
The meeting ground is reached by negation not affirmation. Humility, that mother of wisdom, requires a setting aside of what is believed to be known, to honestly experience what is in itself. Negative theology concerns itself with negating the masks through which we interpret primary religious experience. It is a path which dispels the differences which are belief base by allowing what is a common human experience to speak quietly and potently to each. Without the weight of belief their is a tremendous freedom from the existential fears and hopes of hell and heaven. There is no compelling drive to protect the ego by vesting it to a belief-set and their is the freedom to find the Divine in all places and times, without regard to the label or lack thereof.

report abuse


posted June 22, 2009 at 8:23 pm

Great post, Dr. Collins!

report abuse

Your Name

posted July 14, 2009 at 12:21 pm

Dr. Collins is right when he says “Scientists always seek to improve their theories, and, when necessary, overturn them. …there is no place for soft mindedness in science.”
I am often saddened by the attitude of many scientists who reject the Bible as a source of truth without examining the evidence, the historical accuracy, the fullfilled prophecy, and the lack of such things in books put out by other faiths. Many so called “critical thinkers” reject the Bible without ever reading it.
Many who call themselves scientists will often only accept evidence that fits with their world view and will refuse or suppress evidence that that points to the existence of a creator god who is involved with and cares for his creation. Such people should learn to toughen up their minds and overturn theories that do not fit with reality.

report abuse


posted July 23, 2009 at 1:09 pm

Dr. Collins,
When is your liberal shoe going to drop? To discard from the fundamentals of the apostolic Christian culture what limits an individual from living a life like a hedonist/glutton? That seems the only fruit of evolutionism. Good meds for a continued unfettered promiscuous sex life. Or to promote socialism.

report abuse

Previous Posts

We're Moving
Science & the Sacred is moving to our new home on The BioLogos Foundation's Web site. Be sure to visit and bookmark our new location to stay up to date with the latest blogs from Karl Giberson, Darrel Falk, Pete Enns, and our various guests ...

posted 8:00:00am Dec. 11, 2009 | read full post »

Shiny Scales, Silvery Skins, and Evolution
  Source: Physorg.comIridescence -- a key component of certain makeup, paints, coatings of mirrors and lenses -- is also an important feature in the natural world. Both fish and spiders make use of periodic photonic systems, which scatter ...

posted 8:00:00am Dec. 09, 2009 | read full post »

A Stellar Advent Calendar
Looking for a unique way to mark the days of the Advent season? The Web site offers an Advent calendar composed of images from the Hubble Telescope, both old and new. Each day, from now until the celebration of the Nativity of Christ, ...

posted 8:00:00am Dec. 09, 2009 | read full post »

Belief, Guidance, and Evolution
Recently BioLogos' Karl Giberson was interviewed by Marcio Campos for the Brazilian newspaper Gazeta do Povo's Tubo De Ensaio (i.e. "Test tube") section. What follows is a translated transcript of that interview, which we will be posting in ...

posted 8:00:00am Dec. 08, 2009 | read full post »

Let's Come at this From a Different Angle
Every Friday, "Science and the Sacred" features an essay from a guest voice in the science and religion dialogue. This week's guest entry was written by Peter Enns. Enns is an evangelical Christian scholar and author of several books and ...

posted 8:00:00am Dec. 04, 2009 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.